So this is work...?. Lol. So, this. is work. Switch the two faces and it makes sense
Home Funny Pictures YouTube Funny Videos Funny GIFs Text/Links Channels Search

So this is work...?


So, this. is work
Views: 28446
Favorited: 48
Submitted: 10/25/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to aaanicklll E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend


Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Anonymous commenting is allowed
#84 - aaanicklll (05/22/2013) [-]
Mfw you are all stupid
#55 - italianplumberz **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#47 - mytrakytra (10/26/2012) [-]
This image has expired
#46 - anonymous (10/26/2012) [-]
Guys, it's fine. If Romney becomes president the debt will become his fault. Then he can give it to China like he usually does and problem solved. No debt.
#31 - plehhbloops has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #28 - thenameschuck (10/26/2012) [-]
This was one of the best episodes of spongebob....just sayin
#22 - moldykittens (10/26/2012) [-]
either way, its funny.
User avatar #21 - rjhonetwothree (10/26/2012) [-]
The faces should be switched, and the caption should read:
"So, this is change?"
#20 - boredomavenger (10/26/2012) [-]
ohohohohooooo is funny because all of Romney's income is from investments!

#19 - xspacemanx (10/26/2012) [-]
So this is the thanks I get for getting work over seas.
User avatar #16 - messerschmidto ONLINE (10/26/2012) [-]
Other way around.
User avatar #14 - xIArcticIx (10/26/2012) [-]
I feel no matter how much Romney gets hated on, He still would do a better job for the economy than Obama. I mean in the next couple years if Obama is president I wouldn't be surprised the U.S. becomes socialist.
User avatar #36 to #14 - rockmanneos (10/26/2012) [-]
You do know that Romney's going to try for a trickle down economics plan, right?
Which has been historically proven to be a terrible plan.
#32 to #14 - blahdudeblah (10/26/2012) [-]
Despite the fact that the deficit goes up 2.6 trillion dollars under Romney's plan, despite the fact that he represents a return to the policies that caused one of the greatest depressions this country has seen...

yeah, Romney would do a wonderful job.
User avatar #41 to #32 - xIArcticIx (10/26/2012) [-]
you can try to talk me out of rooting for Romney for this but I'm standing by my word. Obama is in my opinion a bad president. I don't like him, I don't like his ideas, and I definitely HATE the fact that so many people think Obama was the only reason why got Osama. The only thing he did was give the okay for the permission to kill.
#49 to #41 - blahdudeblah (10/26/2012) [-]
oh, and one more tidbit of information for you.

Sense the Regan years republitards have had thirty six years in the white house, dems twenty four.

In these time spans you see deficit decreases in EVERY democratic presidency, and deficit increases in EVERY rebuplitard presidency. You see double the amount of jobs created, not to mention other acts/bills/ect passed to the betterment of the middle and lower classes, during democratic presidencies as you do republitard ones.

Not to mention the fact that if you talked to Romney about any topic for longer than five minutes, you'd get ten different answers.
#44 to #41 - blahdudeblah (10/26/2012) [-]
ok, so how about this;

what is wrong with forcing insurance companies to cover people with preexisting conditions?

what is wrong with lower taxes on the middle class and public works?

what is wrong with pulling out of Iraq?

What is wrong with allowing women the right to chose, and working towards gender equality?

what is wrong with supporting gay/ ******* /bi/transsexual rights?

on Romney's side;

What is right about tax breaks for the wealthiest?

what is right about returning to don't ask/don't tell?

what is right about voting against equal pay for women?

what is right about trying to make a constitutional amendment that would not only ban abortions (even if needed to save the mother's life) but would also ban invitro fertilization?

what is right about proposing and supporting laws that redefine rape, so that if a woman isn't able to simply say no any more?

what is right about a prez candidate who wants to return to the policies and plans that led us to where we are today? who wants to launch more unfunded wars? Who's patzies at the state level are pushing laws that discriminate against minorities that are more likely to vote dem?
User avatar #48 to #44 - xIArcticIx (10/26/2012) [-]
Ok thats great. But my big point if I feel Obama is trying to make the U.S. go into a socialist state. There is no way in hell our country could afford that or would even want that.
#50 to #48 - blahdudeblah (10/26/2012) [-]
What is socialism? Is it the idea that you shouldn't have to die because you don't have money to pay a hospital?

How about, should children starve because their parents ****** up?
User avatar #74 to #50 - xIArcticIx (10/26/2012) [-]
basically its more government ownership and "give equal distribution of a good life style to everyone" which usually doesn't go very well. Look up facts here. I really am sick of talking politics here.
#81 to #74 - xIArcticIx has deleted their comment [-]
#80 to #74 - blahdudeblah (10/27/2012) [-]
and btw, if you are sick of talking politics, then why did you throw down the gauntlet for us to attack you for voting for a group of narrow minded old men who want to force everyone else to live the way they want you to.
User avatar #82 to #80 - xIArcticIx (10/27/2012) [-]
didn't think someone would go full retard on this post but you have obviously exceeded my expectations
#83 to #82 - blahdudeblah (10/27/2012) [-]
How so? Romney has made it clear he panders to the extreme elements in the GOP. His VP has made it clear that he wants to destroy any and all aid programs. That they want to turn medicare and social security over to the private sector (cause yeah, I'm totally down with having people who care about stock holder profits control my future and my health).

The same people who want to outlaw gay marriage, simply because they don't like it.

How is that full retard for me? Or is it that I know more about your candidate than you do?
#79 to #74 - blahdudeblah (10/27/2012) [-]
Except how has Obama done that? Yes, the ACA could be construed as that... until you look at Australia (which has true socialized healthcare, and enjoys half our unemployment rate, less than a quarter of our mass shootings, and around two thirds of our rate of homelessness).

Socialism is a term thrown around by the right because idiots who don't know what socialism really is (here's a hint, what you said isn't Socialism, its not even communism, its Stalinism, which is a perversion of communism) get scared and vote their way.

Face the facts, Romney represents government getting to tell you who you can marry. He represents the END of any and ALL student aid (check the facts, Ryan has sworn that it is a life goal of his to kill said systems), the end of social security and medicare as we know it. He represents taking a woman's right to chose away from her. He represents redefining "rape", because "its just another way for women to keep from having babies" (keep in mind that his VP Paul Ryan cosponsored Todd Aikin's bill to redefine rape).

By voting for him you are telling any and all women in your life that they don't get to chose what happens to their bodies. You are telling them that they can't get in-vitro fertilization (Ryan wants a constitutional amendment, the particulars of which would define personhood as starting at conception, thus making in-vitro illegal). You are telling people that if they don't conform to your narrow definition of marriage to go **** themselves. You are telling women that they have to be "legitimately raped" to make a claim.

But yeah, if you want to tell anyone who doesn't want to live according to your narrow definition of how things should be, then vote for that ******* .
#17 to #14 - messerschmidto ONLINE (10/26/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#15 to #14 - anonymous (10/26/2012) [-]
At what cost?
User avatar #13 - tomainstream (10/26/2012) [-]
shouldn't the heads be switched since Obama is currently president and the economy is still **** and he has only made things worse? Just sayin'
#25 to #13 - anonymous (10/26/2012) [-]
Implying that every single economic signal has only dampened.
dat DOW
#11 - anonymous (10/25/2012) [-]
shouldn't it be the other way around since he is the president and things are still **** ?
#40 to #10 - geekinit (10/26/2012) [-]
User avatar #9 - proudnerd (10/25/2012) [-]
Switch the two faces and it makes sense
User avatar #30 to #9 - KillYourself (10/26/2012) [-]
**** welfare, **** foodstamps, people should get ******* jobs
User avatar #38 to #30 - rockmanneos (10/26/2012) [-]
So what do we do with veterans who lost their arms and legs in wars fought to defend us? They can't get jobs, let's call them lazy ass holes who don't deserve the help they need.
User avatar #39 to #38 - KillYourself (10/26/2012) [-]
obviously there's exceptions, but I see so many people just abusing the system
User avatar #42 to #39 - rockmanneos (10/26/2012) [-]
Actually, most people who rely on welfare still have jobs. The only reason they rely on it is because the 'jobs' they're working are low paying with no benefits. It's not the hand out many people think it is, but rather a hand up.
Yes, there ARE those that abuse the system, but should we completely close it off simply because a few lazy asses are finding loop holes? It's just something the government is going to have to crack down on. Such an example: drug testing. Doing drugs? No free money for you.
#8 - onily (10/25/2012) [-]
**onily rolled a random image posted in comment #20 at Drop the bass ** funny you could switch their faces and its still funny
User avatar #7 - iLime (10/25/2012) [-]
Romney brought the company target out of the ******* . Do some research before jumping on a bandwagon.
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)