Good Call Marilyn

Saying you like fat girls on the internet doesn't make you a better person.

Yes, I like curvy girls, but that's just my opinion and not the point I'm making. I'm saying nothing about "fat"girls. I'm merely talking about girls who aren't so skeletal that you can easily see their bones. If you think that's fat, then you have issues.

desperate anon is desperate

i find it humorous that when a guy likes smaller and larger women he is just "desperate"

-be me in 11th grade getting to know cute chubby girl
-some thinner girl likes me too
-go to her house and find out she's a major slut
-date chubby girl instead

it's been a year and a half since then and she's lost a lot of weight

dating an initially chubby girl pays off big time in the end and so few people realize it, which is really sad.

that's not fat, it's chubby.
<this is fat
know the difference

its fat

no that's morbidly fucking obese. know the difference.

so you're basically acknowledging there is a difference between curvy, chubby, fat, and morbidly obese, right?

Am I the only one who agrees with him in the sense I wouldn't particularly want to screw someone who has the same body structure as a twig? It IS better to be slightly overweight rather than anorexic, isn't it? Probably gonna get thumbed down into oblivion, but oh well

I am offensive and I find this overweight.

oh damn sorry my body isn't considered pleasing to you, let me gorge myself with mcdonald's to meet your standards

pic related, it's you.

I can play the same game, you know.

Damn, look at those sexy ribs and exposed pelvis.

bro, there is a big difference between being SKINNY and ANOREXIC. that boy is ANOREXIC.
<this is skinny.

I'd usually go for someone a few sizes bigger, but she's not that bad. To be honest, I just find women like this a whole lot sexier.

I mean if that's what you find attractive go for it, but don't act like your opinion is the definition of what is attractive in a girl -_-
"Skinny girls are no more attractive than fat girls... "
"that's disgusting"
some girls work hard as fuck to be skinny and maintain a nice body because they think that's what guys like and they don't want to be told their hard work is "disgusting and unattractive"
all I'm saying bro.

I think we're differing on our definition of "skinny"... When I hear that word, I think of an anorexic woman, which isn't attractive. If you say "thin" or "slender", then I can see where the sexiness comes in.

A nice balance of skinny with some weight would be to prefer. Specially around ones wrists. Mine are barely thicker than bone covered with skin, and it freaks me out a little

Wait....so they liked the exact same thing most people like today....not fat, but not super skinny.

but don't get me wrong, in the 50's they LOVED a tiny waist, and so they used girdles, but overall their bodies were more on the "curvy" side

i mean, today they might be considered a little more to love, not thin, but definitely not fat, or even over weight.

I don't enjoy looking at extremely slim models either...

Im a little chubby, 160-165 pounds in weight, I checked 2 months ago and weighed 162. And I respect your opinion of fat people.

I don't understand why the hell they ask for fat models. Yeah, chubby models are good. But holy fuck, I don't want to have over half the dress forced between rolls, and when you strut, it pops out of the sweaty, onion smelling crevice that is your stomach, it wafts the small over the judges.

You would be welcomed with open arms on /fit/

worth watching through to the end.

Excuse me? You can be a size zero, or smaller, and not be a sickly malnourished unrealistic figure.

Coming from a family line of females who are petite, it's an insult that is sputtered all the time- even to past generations.

For example, my mother, who is 40, has never weighed more than 99 pounds. ( and she eats quite a bit- mainly unhealthy, grease filled.. gross food, She's 5'1, and has fit into a size 14 in child's since she was a teenager. My grandmother, who is 5'2, is 112 pounds. When she was a senior in highschool, she only weighed 78 pounds.

I'm 5'4, ( a junior in highschool ) and weigh 80 pounds. [ The smallest boned of the family, with a hipsize of 29 inches; a size 10 in girl's jeans ] I'm far from sickly. I'm far from unrealistic. Sometimes- can you believe it- people can naturally be small framed/boned.

Recently I've had blood drawn, and besides a high white blood cell count ( from a viral infection ) my health was " phenomenal ". No deficiencies, nothing. Even the doctors commented on how small I was, but it was even stated then: "It seems to be healthy and fits you well. "

Sickly and malnourished- Bah! I suppose it's not too common to have such a small maintaining frame with little effort- but to call anyone "malnourished" for being small is... insulting. ( Unless, of course, it was unnatural )

It's a general fact with you and your family being the exception, don't get offended.

Okay read your first sentence and before I read the rest, answer me this. Did you understand that he says that there are 2 kinds of size 0 women? The size 0 that are sick and mlanourished and then there are the size 0 nice toned sexy figure.

I read it as, and still read it as:

[ First statement ]There's size 0; they have an sickly, malnourished, unrealistic figure. [Sickly, malnourished ]
[ New statement ]Then there's the nice toned sexy figure. [ Some figure in between chubby and sickly, but not relating to size zero- because that's unhealthy and hideous. ]
[New statement ]Then there's being a slight bit chubby to which having a bit of meat is desirable. [ Slight chubby, but desirable
[ New statment ]Then there's size +20, to which they're as fat as fuck. [ Fat as fuck, apparently. ]

Yes, but surely you understood that his point was simply that there are girls so skinny they're really unattractive, skinny attractive girls, a bit overweight but still attractive girls, and girls so fat they're really unattractive. No need for your whole rant there.

I understood the point, but to have people constantly comment on how "small I am" and that I need to 'put on some meat'- which is nearly impossible to do it seems, is no better than if I went around and constantly commented on how 'large' or 'fat' others were.

It's frustrating is all. Being a size zero, or smaller, is no-where near unnatural or unhealthy- unless forced- but he (or she) stated it as if all of females who fit into small size(s) like so are unhealthy.

*sigh*

My brother's gf is absolutely tiny just like you, so I know what you are talking about.
She is 23 and looks like a tiny freshman in high school and weighs less than 100 lbs

If thats you in your profile pic, you should worry more about your hair than your weight lol

Why do you say that? I used to have a mohawk for- say- about two years, but I shaved everything except my fringe and am now growing my hawk back from scratch.

In the meantime I used hair dye to put cheetah spots on the side of my head.

What do you mean why did I say that? Your hair looks silly.

Perhaps that is merely yours, and a few other's views, it could be silly.

I've always dressed, spoke, and presented myself in any way I found aesthetically pleasing. I never bias how I present myself based on other's judgement. Even if 'silly'- It is better to enjoy oneself than keep one's ideals under lock and undercover by another's.

Although, I eventually think I will end up on " People of Walmart" due to this. *laughs*

You've got such a pretty face but what you did to your hair was very risky. I can see that it's creative and all but honestly cherish the long beautiful hair that you women have been blessed with.

Women should show off their beautiful hair more than they should with actual boobs.

I just think it's a shame when beautiful girls do this to their hair.

I think it's a shame when females keep their hair long. It hides all the lovely curves of one's skull and makes their facial features less defined. =/

Long hair is like an blunt, concealing veil that hides the bones that keeps a lovely feature of the human- the magnificent brain.

I quite like short hair on both sexes ( that, or partially shaved heads ). Long hair, no matter how well taken care of, looks all over the place, and messy/disorganized. ( Not to mention all the freedoms that come with short hair! )

There's plenty of freedom in long hair. A shaved head just doesn't look good on a girl, short hair is fine but shaved just looks like you hate your hair so you got rid of it.

Plenty of freedom? Well, if you like hair that stays damp and wet for hours after the shower unless you blowdry it. Or perhaps, you enjoy the freedom of having your own hair whip you in the face when blown by the wind? Or maybe the weight of the hair that holds down your skull more and makes it take more energy to move your head to the sides? Or maybe the freedom of being bound by a standard that marks you on one side of the great sex divide?

Shaved and short hair is beautiful on either sex. It shows security in one's natural shape, cleanliness if well kept, and a freedom loving personality/not so bound by what is enforced by societies pre set standards/rules. [ mainly in females ]

I find long hair quite hideous on both male and female tho'

Personal opinions; all of them.

Some societies in the past associated being fat as being rich or successful and it was considered appealing....

actually there are hundreds of cultures around the world where fatter and fuller women are considered healthier and more beautiful. in a lot of these cultures food isn't as abundant as it is here so a bigger woman demonstrates that her suitor is a better provider. in some parts of Africa they actually force feed their daughters to make them more attractive to men.

"are considered healthier"
Thay can "consider" whatever they want, reality isn't going to change though

tell me something, when food is scarce how long is a fatter person going to survive on relation to a skinny person. it is indeed better for your health to have more energy stored up when you live in a place where the food supply is not guaranteed

So when the options are two unhealthy ones the less unhealthy becomes healthy? No. They aren't healthy because they're the lesser of two evils. The fact is being obese is just unhealthy. So if a normal sized, in shape girl went to this country they'd consider a fat girl healthier, but they'd still be wrong.

healthy is the weight that allows you to survive best in your particular environment. they don't have to be obese just a little bigger than normal to survive best in their circumstances

The guy you replied to was referring to fat people. You then said cultures consider these people to be healthier. I told you they are wrong because they are wrong.

Being healthy literally means to be in good health. It does not mean "the weight that allows you to survive best in your particular environment." If your weight causes you health problems, it doesn't matter what environment you're in, you're not healthy. And please explain which environments are better suited for fat people to survive because you know who keeps those people alive in those cultures? The non-over weight people that actually have the ability to get them food.

Agreed. The fact of the matter is that being fat is unattractive an the person only has themselves to blame.

didn't think that trough, but people get the message

Exactly the same can be said for underweight people too. It's a two way street, man.

Of course. But underweight people it's usually because they refuse to eat or work themselves way to hard.

it was probably an exaggeration, which gives you a good perspective of today's society