Some pretty awesome facts.. . tryan Cranston _ii. i. ' i. i, viii; different ate. L Internet users is ingly 605 (/ ii)."' destroying ', (if,':') the banks 'Alli Some pretty awesome facts tryan Cranston _ii i ' viii; different ate L Internet users is ingly 605 (/ ii) "' destroying (if ':') the banks 'Alli
Upload
Login or register

Some pretty awesome facts.

Click to block a category:GamingPoliticsNewsComicsAnimeOther
tryan Cranston _ii. i. ' i. i, viii; different
ate. L
Internet users is ingly 605 (/ ii)."'
destroying ', (if,':') the banks 'Alli) k' iii' !retinitis ".
man? from their debts - - so Mail " . t I
viii.
art I
it t
the giving : o"
ibae away 'ifrit' i' '
fortune in their lifetime ' . I
an anonymous donor pays for the college education
of every student in Kalamazoo, Michigan
...
+2636
Views: 70128 Submitted: 09/26/2012
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (201)
[ 201 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#13 - ravyen
Reply +61 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
I don't see why every good person must be drawn with a joint in their mouth. What, only tokers are good people?
#14 to #13 - brotherhood
Reply -9 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
yeah cuz their high and not in their right mind
#121 to #13 - anon id: 6479da45
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
by that logic every hat wearing person is an asshole
User avatar #15 to #13 - Kyue
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
It's there to relate the images with Good Guy Greg
User avatar #24 to #13 - esmebuffay
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
I see your point but it's because of the GGG meme, it was either put a join in their mouth or give them a slight unibrow which is harder to notice.
User avatar #169 to #24 - henkstr
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
until now, i never knew ggg had a slight unibrow...
#16 to #13 - jaerbuen [OP]
Reply +170 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
> Commenter seems to be missing the point.
> Gives him a break
#27 - yourmomiswatching
Reply +41 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
MFW Actually interesting facts on FJ
#190 - spartyon
Reply +29 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
MFW I live in the town next to Kalamazoo..
#220 to #190 - rottingwhaleanus **User deleted account**
+5 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#78 - spazzin
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
It's raining cold hard facts up in here.
#131 - dirtywizarder **User deleted account**
+15 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #162 to #131 - admiralen
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
= real life tyler durden
#132 to #131 - dirtywizarder **User deleted account**
+11 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#133 to #132 - dirtywizarder **User deleted account**
+15 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#144 to #133 - jaerbuen [OP]
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
I know what I did, and I stand by it.
I know what I did, and I stand by it.
User avatar #136 to #133 - poopee
Reply -24 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
samefag.
#159 to #136 - Viggiator
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
He is saying that OP did a good job, not himself.
He is saying that OP did a good job, not himself.
User avatar #230 to #136 - poopee
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2012) [-]
holy flying **** I got a lot of red from that.
#75 - xtnega
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
How can 603 people be 0% of North Korea's population? Are there infinite North Koreans?
User avatar #130 to #75 - points
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
In statistics like this the aim is not an absolute value. We are presented with the fact that 605 N. Koreans use the internet so we may assume that 0.0% is greater than 0. Using 0 as a significant figure is NOT always incorrect- only when using this number in a calculation does the absoulte number become necessary.
#79 to #75 - paradoxpoetic
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
Population of North Korea is (roughly) 24,451,285.
605 / 24,451,285 is much less than 1%. If you were to round to the closest percentage point to two decimals, that's what it's rounded to.
#81 to #79 - xtnega
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
You don't round something to zero, that's counter-intuitive. You would state: 'Less than 0.01%' or to whatever decimal place you wish
#86 to #81 - paradoxpoetic
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
0.00002474307 isn't even close to 0.01 though. Saying "less than 0.01%" in this case is almost equivalent to saying "less than 10%" or "less than 3%" because of how great the difference is.

I mean, it's been a while since I've rounded anything near zero, but I would assume that when you round to the closest hundredth, you would produce the mathematical product.
User avatar #88 to #86 - xtnega
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
Note I said 'to whatever decimal place you wish'. There is no reason as to why he couldn't have added a few extra decimal places.
#92 to #88 - paradoxpoetic
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
I know he could have, but he didn't. Since he showed us 0.00%, we are to assume that he is rounding to the hundredths, which gives us that number.
User avatar #96 to #92 - xtnega
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
You should never 'assume' in mathematics.

Even then, rounding it to 0.00 is a very bad idea, for all we know it could have been 0.00000000000000...1%
#98 to #96 - paradoxpoetic
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
Granted he could have done some scientific notation to accurately represent the data (2.474307 x 10^5) but instead he rounded to two decimal places. I don't disagree, I think he could have and should have been more accurate,but since he rounded to the closest hundredth percent, this is the mathematical answer he arrived at. It wasn't presented as much for accuracy, as it was for shock value.
#102 to #98 - xtnega
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
Indeed.   
It isn't often you find someone on the internet with enough common sense to carry any sort of argument (even if we were somewhat arguing the same point), so thumbs for you!
Indeed.
It isn't often you find someone on the internet with enough common sense to carry any sort of argument (even if we were somewhat arguing the same point), so thumbs for you!
#104 to #102 - paradoxpoetic
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
Likewise, good sir.
User avatar #87 to #81 - corundum
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
Nah, you can do that. The way you do it is a little better, but still not much more accurate.
#126 to #81 - wadofwade
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
Claims to be sarcastic.
Continues to defend his point.
Not sarcastic, therefore stupid
User avatar #128 to #126 - xtnega
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
I meant being sarcastic about there being infinite Koreans, I thought that much was obvious.
#19 - gerthc
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
I really enjoyed it reading these facts. Maybe some more?
#22 to #19 - KungFuZerO
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
No problem. Just go to ebaumsworld.com where he stole them
TheMoreYouKnow.jpg
#149 to #22 - jaerbuen [OP]
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
No, I did not find these on ebaumsworld. Who the **** goes to ebaumsworld anyway? Take your butthurt someplace else.
#215 to #149 - KungFuZerO
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
hahahaha what a faggot
i dont care where u reposted from
its ok if u cant think of funny things on your own
not all of us can be creative
User avatar #21 to #19 - jaerbuen [OP]
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
#71 to #21 - superanonymouspers
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
you should've used this...

that's my opinion anyway... but still, those facts are awesome.
#155 - grimmwaters
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
************* Cranston.

What a role-model.
#70 - bloodyfox **User deleted account**
+11 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#201 to #70 - ThekidsTEN
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
I'm from that area and you have to be in the school district since you were little to get benefits. If you transfer in you don't get quite as much.
#223 - scootalooisyourgod
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(09/27/2012) [-]
When I saw the one about billionaires giving away half of their money, I saw the GGG cigarette, I was like 'Why is there the same ciga- AAAHHHHH YOU'Z A FUNNY GUY OP!'

Clever little touch there.
#233 to #223 - anon id: a1e09b18
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/30/2012) [-]
Are you dumb? its a joint...
#234 to #233 - wishka
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(09/30/2012) [-]
Yeah its a joint
User avatar #235 to #234 - scootalooisyourgod
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/30/2012) [-]
I know it's a joint, I didn't mean to say cigarette, I wasn't thinking when I commented