| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
#261
-
byposted (09/25/2012) [-] 
lol what a liberal faggot.
I'm not even going to repost that Martin Luther King was a Communist nigger pasta. All I can do here is laugh
I'm not even going to repost that Martin Luther King was a Communist nigger pasta. All I can do here is laugh
#267 to #262
-
byposted (09/25/2012) [-] Just some quick facts from a thread here yesterday:
1. "Martin Luther King" is not his legitimate name. His legal birth name was Micheal King.
2. He cannot legitimately be labeled as "Dr." He was found to have plagiarized over half of his work from an academic committee.
3. He was also a sex-addicted degenerate who regularly fucked White prostitutes, beating them. (This was discovered when the FBI placed surveillance on him for his Communist connections in the pre-60's. Also, there is evidence to suggest shortly before he died, that he fucked a White prostitute as well.)
1. "Martin Luther King" is not his legitimate name. His legal birth name was Micheal King.
2. He cannot legitimately be labeled as "Dr." He was found to have plagiarized over half of his work from an academic committee.
3. He was also a sex-addicted degenerate who regularly fucked White prostitutes, beating them. (This was discovered when the FBI placed surveillance on him for his Communist connections in the pre-60's. Also, there is evidence to suggest shortly before he died, that he fucked a White prostitute as well.)
#279 to #267
-
imfromyoutube **User deleted account** (09/25/2012) [-] "Just some quick facts for a thread yesterday:"
Two questions.
1. How would you know that these are legitimate facts when you just came across them on a thread yesterday and
2. Do you have any proof whatsoever?
Two questions.
1. How would you know that these are legitimate facts when you just came across them on a thread yesterday and
2. Do you have any proof whatsoever?
#285 to #279
-
byposted (09/25/2012) [-] See these posts I just created for sources:
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/4120434/cooool/278#278
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/4120434/cooool/282#282
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/4120434/cooool/278#278
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/4120434/cooool/282#282
#275 to #267
-
staticenhance (09/25/2012) [-] Right. And every single journalist and historian ever since then has either conveniently omitted these things from their articles, lecture and studies, or they lacked the investigative tools to make themselves aware of it.
Or you're just some 15 year old retarded racist faggot boy on the internet.
Or you're just some 15 year old retarded racist faggot boy on the internet.
#273 to #267
-
aussiepridevil (09/25/2012) [-] well in martin luther king's time he was seen as a radical and obviously much right wing propaganda was thrown his way to make him less likable by the american public
as mr, king was a church pastor and priest and a family man for his whole life i find it hard to believe "he raped and beat up white prostitutes"
as mr, king was a church pastor and priest and a family man for his whole life i find it hard to believe "he raped and beat up white prostitutes"
#282 to #269
-
byposted (09/25/2012) [-] Third Source, on Micheal King's sex drive with White prostitutes.
01/19/98 Newsweek, Page 62
January 6, 1964, was a long day for Martin Luther King Jr. He spent the morning seated in the reserved section of the Supreme Court, listening as lawyers argued New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, a landmark case rising out of King's crusade against segregation in Alabama. The minister was something of an honored guest: Justice Arthur Goldberg quietly sent down a copy of Kings account of the Montgomery bus boycott, "Stride Toward Freedom," asking for an autograph. That night King retired to his room at the Willard Hotel. There FBI bugs reportedly picked up 14 hours of party chatter, the clinking of glasses and the sounds of illicit sex--including King's cries of "I'm f--ing for God" and "I'm not a Negro tonight!"
01/19/98 Newsweek, Page 62
January 6, 1964, was a long day for Martin Luther King Jr. He spent the morning seated in the reserved section of the Supreme Court, listening as lawyers argued New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, a landmark case rising out of King's crusade against segregation in Alabama. The minister was something of an honored guest: Justice Arthur Goldberg quietly sent down a copy of Kings account of the Montgomery bus boycott, "Stride Toward Freedom," asking for an autograph. That night King retired to his room at the Willard Hotel. There FBI bugs reportedly picked up 14 hours of party chatter, the clinking of glasses and the sounds of illicit sex--including King's cries of "I'm f--ing for God" and "I'm not a Negro tonight!"
#287 to #282
-
imfromyoutube **User deleted account** (09/25/2012) [-] You know that no one will believe you if you just copy and paste text (Amusing you didn't make it up on the spot) without a link or proof. Also, how does having sex prove that you're a communist who raped and beat white protesters?
#278 to #269
-
byposted (09/25/2012) [-] >too lazy to Google
First one can be verified by Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther_King,_Jr.
"Martin Luther King, Jr. named Michael King at birth..."
His name was never legally changed.
Second one I will give you a Jew York Times article which reported on the committee's findings.
www.nytimes.com/1991/10/11/us/boston-u-panel-finds-plagiarism-by-dr-king. html
A committee of scholars appointed by Boston University concluded today that the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. plagiarized passages in his dissertation for a doctoral degree at the university 36 years ago.
"There is no question," the committee said in a report to the university's provost, "but that Dr. King plagiarized in the dissertation by appropriating material from sources not explicitly credited in notes, or mistakenly credited, or credited generally and at some distance in the text from a close paraphrase or verbatim quotation."
Despite its finding, the committee said that "no thought should be given to the revocation of Dr. King's doctoral degree," an action that the panel said would serve no purpose.
Gee...I wonder why? What they discovered should effectively exclude Micheal King from a label of intellectualism.
Third one coming up
First one can be verified by Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther_King,_Jr.
"Martin Luther King, Jr. named Michael King at birth..."
His name was never legally changed.
Second one I will give you a Jew York Times article which reported on the committee's findings.
www.nytimes.com/1991/10/11/us/boston-u-panel-finds-plagiarism-by-dr-king. html
A committee of scholars appointed by Boston University concluded today that the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. plagiarized passages in his dissertation for a doctoral degree at the university 36 years ago.
"There is no question," the committee said in a report to the university's provost, "but that Dr. King plagiarized in the dissertation by appropriating material from sources not explicitly credited in notes, or mistakenly credited, or credited generally and at some distance in the text from a close paraphrase or verbatim quotation."
Despite its finding, the committee said that "no thought should be given to the revocation of Dr. King's doctoral degree," an action that the panel said would serve no purpose.
Gee...I wonder why? What they discovered should effectively exclude Micheal King from a label of intellectualism.
Third one coming up
