Anti-gun implies that you don't support the general use or - #65598967 added by ericzxvc at Logic does not apply to...

#648 - anon id: fd364972

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/07/2012) [-]

The Straight Test.
If someone attempted to inflict pain, and possibly death upon the person you love most, would you be willing to have sex with someone of your gender to save your loved one?

A) yes
B) no

If you answered A: You are a homosexual

If you answered B: Unfortunately for your loved one, you are straight

if you answered A, but still claim to be straight: Logic doesnt apply.

So OP.... Enjoy gargling them ballsacks you anus eating faggotron.

#678 to #648 - mikepetru

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(09/08/2012) [-]

to be homosexual means that you have a strong sexual desire/attraction for someone of your gender.
forced sex does not imply an express desire for the sex and therefore does not constitute homosexuality
Anti-gun implies that no one should ever use guns under any circumstances.
Therefore, OP is not a faggot

#686 to #678 - ericzxvc

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/08/2012) [-]

Anti-gun implies that you don't support the general use or ownership of guns, not that you would never use a gun. If you were offered a situation where a loved one would die or you could use a gun, you would choose to use a gun of course, the same reason you would have sex with someone of the same gender, but only because the situation is so specific. These both mean the same thing, anon is right, the situation is a completely rigged so that only one answer is right.

#718 to #686 - narutolas

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/08/2012) [-]

Not to start any **** storms or anything, i get your point. But it's like.. when's the last time somebody held a gun up to your moms' head and yelled at you, "if you want her to live, have sex with my friend jerry" It's just so much more likely to be stuck in a situation where you kill them with a gun or they kill your loved one with a gun. Look, the concept of the 2nd amendment is personal safety, so OP's scenario is right where it should be. The concepts of homosexuality as a preference and personal security are two different ballparks

#652 to #648 - narwhalsnballs [OP] **User deleted account**

-4 123456789123345869

Comment deleted by Abandoned [-]

#680 to #652 - petal

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(09/08/2012) [-]

And women can't be gay?

#687 to #680 - cuntmin **User deleted account**

-1 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#682 to #680 - narwhalsnballs [OP] **User deleted account**

0 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#698 to #682 - petal

Reply -2 123456789123345869

(09/08/2012) [-]

gay women can gargle ballsacks, they just probably wouldn't enjoy it very much...

Plus, if you were bisexual you might consider yourself gay.

Either way you're retarded because your so called "comic" doesn't make sense.

#704 to #698 - narwhalsnballs [OP] **User deleted account**

+1 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#777 to #704 - petal

Reply -2 123456789123345869

(09/08/2012) [-]