| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
#648
-
N. Korean citizen (09/07/2012) [-]
The Straight Test.
If someone attempted to inflict pain, and possibly death upon the person you love most, would you be willing to have sex with someone of your gender to save your loved one?
A) yes
B) no
If you answered A: You are a homosexual
If you answered B: Unfortunately for your loved one, you are straight
if you answered A, but still claim to be straight: Logic doesnt apply.
So OP.... Enjoy gargling them ballsacks you anus eating faggotron.
If someone attempted to inflict pain, and possibly death upon the person you love most, would you be willing to have sex with someone of your gender to save your loved one?
A) yes
B) no
If you answered A: You are a homosexual
If you answered B: Unfortunately for your loved one, you are straight
if you answered A, but still claim to be straight: Logic doesnt apply.
So OP.... Enjoy gargling them ballsacks you anus eating faggotron.
#678 to #648
-
mikepetru (09/08/2012) [-]
to be homosexual means that you have a strong sexual desire/attraction for someone of your gender.
forced sex does not imply an express desire for the sex and therefore does not constitute homosexuality
Anti-gun implies that no one should ever use guns under any circumstances.
Therefore, OP is not a faggot
forced sex does not imply an express desire for the sex and therefore does not constitute homosexuality
Anti-gun implies that no one should ever use guns under any circumstances.
Therefore, OP is not a faggot
Anti-gun implies that you don't support the general use or ownership of guns, not that you would never use a gun. If you were offered a situation where a loved one would die or you could use a gun, you would choose to use a gun of course, the same reason you would have sex with someone of the same gender, but only because the situation is so specific. These both mean the same thing, anon is right, the situation is a completely rigged so that only one answer is right.
#718 to #686
-
narutolas (09/08/2012) [-]
Not to start any shit storms or anything, i get your point. But it's like.. when's the last time somebody held a gun up to your moms' head and yelled at you, "if you want her to live, have sex with my friend jerry" It's just so much more likely to be stuck in a situation where you kill them with a gun or they kill your loved one with a gun. Look, the concept of the 2nd amendment is personal safety, so OP's scenario is right where it should be. The concepts of homosexuality as a preference and personal security are two different ballparks