The Long War on Christianity. The tags are a lie. Wray. t! atic, ? dayle my/, live In_ an America where Christians iggy, ulsters} freal [, -. Christianity. derh the description is Truth
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (332)
[ 332 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#31 - thechosentroll
Reply +163 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
This image has expired
I love my religion. It's called ***************. Basically, it lets me do what I want, doesn't change my lifestyle in any way and requires no effort whatsoever. The main dogma consists of the three "Don't"s - "Don't know.", "Don't care.", "Don't bother me.". There are no sins other than giving a ****. We also don't have a heaven or hell. Once you bite the dust you get to spend all eternity taking the worlds' longest nap.

Have fun with your little religious argumens while I sit here, laughing at your stupidity.
User avatar #38 to #31 - Plaugue
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
I believe in Video Game God. There's no way another man can take 20 bullets and walk it off in a video game without videogame god
User avatar #118 to #31 - theholum
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Does such a lifestyle even need an '-ism'?
#158 to #118 - thechosentroll
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
This image has expired
#160 to #158 - theholum
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
#232 to #31 - anon id: 846e538b
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Good for you man, I myself am a Atheist but I find these religion fights about as retarded as two toddlers taking each others toys and blaming each other. I don't give a **** about your religion, it's cool you can believe in something, but when you argue about it, that just proves you're a idiot.
#265 to #31 - ericbeagles
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
I'm gonna go ahead and join your religion. Also the picture is how I imagine you. Don't question it.
I'm gonna go ahead and join your religion. Also the picture is how I imagine you. Don't question it.
#49 to #31 - Khasim
Reply +34 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
This is officially called agnosticism. "Gnosis" means "to think" in Latin, "agnosis" - not thinking - basically it's saying "I will never know whether God exists or not, so I will live my life completely ignoring the matter"

And I am jealous of you laughing at people who have religious fights, I'm sad for them because they get mad over meaningless ******** that they can't do anything about. If everyone just stopped fighting over ******** (like faith - MY FAITH IS BETTER THAN YOURS BELIEVE IN WHAT I BELIEVE IN OR YOU ARE A RETARD) the world would be a much better place.

Picture unrelated.
User avatar #51 to #49 - thechosentroll
Reply +18 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Yeah, but I preffer calling it ***************.
User avatar #84 to #49 - msvegeta
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Sounds more like nihilism to me.

He is rejecting the existence of Heaven and Hell, and he clearly defines what he thinks will happen when he dies. Doesn't sound that agnostic to me
#349 to #84 - candidvres **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#143 to #84 - bobsagetissocool
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
It's more apathy than nihlism.
#72 to #49 - anon id: c7efdfc1
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
From the greek gnósis (γνῶσις), «knowledge» --> Agnosticism = impossibility to know (certain "truths")
#70 to #49 - anon id: 6abf9306
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Do not spread ********. It comes from Gnonis, knowledge and A-, without/not. So it basically means we cannot know. Agnostic is used wrongly too. You can be;
Agnostic atheist, Gnostic atheist
Agnostic theist, Gnostic theist

What you are looking for is nihilism.
User avatar #48 - leightonsolomon
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Don't quote me on this, but I'm pretty sure several of the earlier presidents were Deists.
#119 to #48 - Haane
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
"'Don't quote me on this, but I'm pretty sure several of the earlier presidents were Deists.'

- leightonsolomon "

-chrasmaticjdub

-anonymous
User avatar #94 to #48 - AngryPlatypus
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
I believe you are correct sir. If my memory serves me right Thomas Jefferson was a deist.
User avatar #81 to #48 - charasmaticjdub
Reply +89 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
"Don't quote me on this, but I'm pretty sure several of the earlier presidents were Deists."

- leightonsolomon
#105 to #81 - leightonsolomon
Reply +28 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
#114 to #81 - anon id: 92265f48
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
"'Don't quote me on this, but I'm pretty sure several of the earlier presidents were Deists.'

- leightonsolomon "

-chrasmaticjdub
#233 to #114 - bemysenorita **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #93 to #81 - tepeniam
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
"I'm pretty sure several of the...presidents were deists." -leightonsolomon
#22 - polarispotato **User deleted account**
-82 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #126 to #22 - TheCodFather
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
bad troll
#39 to #22 - scantoz
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Catholics were the original Christians.
#55 to #39 - anon id: 19565c8e
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
To be Christian you'd have to follow the teachings of Christ, which they do not.
#57 to #55 - scantoz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
No "Christian" does or else all Christians would be homeless.. ( sell your **** and give it to the poor) Sorry man but the Catholic Church was the first Christian church in existence, you cant say someone isn't Christian just cause you don't think they are.
#89 to #22 - slossboss
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#91 to #22 - thebilliam
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #24 to #22 - xtwinblade
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Catholic is a part of christianity, since you believe in Jesus Christ
#27 to #24 - anon id: 97bff6ea
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
That's not a good example, since muslims also belive in jesus ... apperantly he was the seccond to last prophet. sometimes it doesnt hurt to know a little bit about other religions :P
#32 to #27 - twilightdusk
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Jews believe that Jesus was a slightly crazy Rabbi
Christians believe that Jesus was God
Muslims believe that Jesus was a Prophet, but not God.
User avatar #29 to #27 - fidelito
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
They believe in Jesus but they don't worship him.
User avatar #33 to #29 - upunkpunk
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Yes we do, just like all the prophets. Muhammad is the most important because he was the last messenger of god.
User avatar #43 to #33 - lokiwins
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Why do people thumb you down for stating facts about your religion?
User avatar #45 to #43 - upunkpunk
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
I don't know, people get butthurt for the simplest of things lol
#46 to #22 - derangedberger
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
User avatar #26 to #22 - genericnewfag
Reply +49 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Catholic? You mean Catholic, the branch of Christianity?
User avatar #30 to #26 - rheago
Reply +60 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Catholics are people who adore cats
User avatar #6 - Maroon
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Lol, no one is waging war against Christians. Everyone else just has to defend from the constant stream of BS from Christians.
User avatar #207 to #6 - Krystoking
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Then again, even though it was sarcasm, Christianity is usually the target of media attacks, since it's more "politically correct" not to bash other religions.
User avatar #7 to #6 - ewowo
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
*hint* it's sarcasm.
#8 to #7 - Maroon
Reply +39 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
I know... I wasn't... **** it.
I know... I wasn't... **** it.
User avatar #9 to #8 - ewowo
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
It just seems from the comments that people are taking this seriously.
#142 - thekracken **User deleted account**
+35 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#145 to #142 - anon id: 1f31a20e
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
What if it's an atheist who is a complete prick who just ***** on people with religious beliefs? That would be a ****** president. I'd rather have an agnostic first, then go into an atheist. You have to have a transitional president.
#146 to #145 - thekracken **User deleted account**
+6 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#148 to #145 - anon id: fee9326e
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
perhaps you should read the third sentence of his post, which makes your reply completely pointless.
#215 to #142 - thekracken **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #253 to #142 - sterlingarcher
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Completely agree. Someone that doesnt care about abortions and all that jizz. Perhaps and economic guy that can fix the economy (that's most important right now)
User avatar #155 to #142 - avengingthefallen
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
honestly in my mind, any athiest who's not really a dick about it, one who looks at religions and spiritual beliefs on a level headed and equal plane is more agnostic than anything. Obviously one can still favor the idea that god doesn't exist, i'm consider myself agnostic and i believe that way, but if you're going to be completely reasonable about it, that same person would also be willing to admit that he can't make such a definitive statement about such an uncertain subject. I do agree with what you said though.
#161 to #155 - thekracken **User deleted account**
+2 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #241 to #161 - dbanks
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Agnostic, in its definition, just means "without knowledge". It's possible to be an Agnostic Atheist, to profess non-belief, but not claim to have absolute knowledge if it's true. It's also possible to be an Agnostic Christian, to profess belief, but without absolute knowledge. It doesn't mean unsure, it just means professing a lack of absolute knowledge.
User avatar #194 to #161 - avengingthefallen
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
ag·nos·tic n.
1.
a. One who believes that it is impossible to know whether there is a God.
b. One who is skeptical about the existence of God but does not profess true atheism.

I just don't think it's our place to say. Me being more scientifically minded, regardless of what side I take as far as faith is concerned, at the end of the day there is just no definitive proof that any form of god or a deity, without a doubt, does not exist. Don't get me wrong, I hate religion by all means. but in the broadest senses, i can be anywhere from near athiest, to provisional deist depending on the argument. The only thing that I believe most strongly against is the idea of ANY kind of interventionist god or pre-determined destiny.
#198 to #194 - thekracken **User deleted account**
+1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#240 to #198 - anon id: bacc684d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Agnostic has many definitions my personal definition is someone who does believe in a higher power but the probability of it being guessed or interpreted with accuracy is low as hell. But this is just my input.
User avatar #178 to #142 - latinotornado
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
I dont think their beliefs should matter :P Anyone thats not an extriemist is fine.
#183 to #178 - thekracken **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #189 to #183 - latinotornado
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Ok no offence but what you said their wasent very..thought out. Because first off, thats not true. We have had FANTASTIC presidents who were religious. what you just said is When a religious person gets into office they are biased (which is true in a sence but not with religion) thats not always true. and if the statement you made is true, than an Atheist president would be the same way. he would be biased to those who share his or her lack of belief. Know what im sayin?
#196 to #189 - thekracken **User deleted account**
+2 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #201 to #196 - latinotornado
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
There are atheists who want more gun laws, and dont like homosexuals and believe homosexuals shouldnt be married. Im not completley disagreeing with you. A non-biased president would be nice but their religion/or lack of should not be an issue
#208 to #201 - thekracken **User deleted account**
+1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #211 to #208 - latinotornado
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Thats impossible. It just is, weather their religious or non religious its impossible.
#214 to #211 - thekracken **User deleted account**
+2 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #219 to #214 - latinotornado
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Whats funny is most of the laws we have are from that "text book" be careful what you say my friend. and Non religious can still bring their own beliefs. a Non-Religious person dosent make them completley unbiased and totally fair. for some reason you have that mind set.
#237 to #219 - anon id: bacc684d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Sorry I'm an anon but I'm too lazy to sign in. Whats wrong with what you just said is: religion doesn't birth laws basic human morality does, meaning a specific religion doesn't create laws we as human's know and even feel we are inflicting pain upon another creature be it human or animal and alot of people would argue that we hurt animals in daily basis by eating and consuming animal parts ALTHOUGH that is not true; just vegetables can't support a human nutritionally we require meat for iron and protein and many other nutrients.
#223 to #219 - thekracken **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #227 to #223 - latinotornado
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
No im understanding the non biased part I made that clear -_- what your not understanding is state of belief has nothing to do with being biased. I can be religious and not biased. or atheist and not biased. both parties can be non biased so the you dont have to say an atheist. you can just say a non biased person.
#231 to #227 - thekracken **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #175 to #142 - samanthasfriend
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
if god doesn't exist then why can we fit perfectly on horses?
#182 to #175 - thekracken **User deleted account**
+4 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#192 to #182 - anon id: 8e61082d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
If god doesn't exist why does my chair fit my ass perfectly?
#200 to #192 - thekracken **User deleted account**
+4 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #191 to #142 - akkere
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
I think we just need someone who doesn't mix religion into politics. That simple.

No religious bias, but able to retain whatever belief they want.
#203 to #191 - thekracken **User deleted account**
+3 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #34 - JediismUser
Reply +35 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
I've always wondered if there could be a non-Christian president, they don't have to be Athiest, but maybe Buddhist or something, I'd like to see how that'd play out in America.
User avatar #47 to #34 - rotosushi
Reply -9 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
John F. Kennedy was a catholic
#62 to #47 - Sammael
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]

Catholic church: Christians and churches, western and eastern, in full communion with the Holy See.

Catholics are christian. Except for fringe nutcases everyone knows that.
User avatar #68 to #34 - zraxx
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Well you have to be a monotheist to hold office in several states. One being Texas
#90 to #68 - thebilliam
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
That is according to a state constitution, the federal constitution overrides anything that impedes it.  So for example if a state constitution were to say that in order to hold an office they need to believe in a god then the federal constitution would override that since it holds that no religious test can be used when it comes to governmental jobs
That is according to a state constitution, the federal constitution overrides anything that impedes it. So for example if a state constitution were to say that in order to hold an office they need to believe in a god then the federal constitution would override that since it holds that no religious test can be used when it comes to governmental jobs
User avatar #242 to #90 - zraxx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
I'm just saying what Texas state law says.
#120 to #90 - Haane
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Ha....I'm watching Doctor Who Series 5 right now. :)
#129 to #34 - slumberdonkey
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
How bout morman? Mitt Romney is a morman. I bet he'd make a great president... mfw
#135 to #129 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
+1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #136 to #135 - slumberdonkey
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Is a christian really anyone that believes that christ was the son of god?
#138 to #136 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
+2 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#197 to #34 - clonicity
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Isn't Obama a Jew?
I heard it somewhere, don't kill me if I'm wrong :(
User avatar #35 to #34 - fuzzyballs
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
a christian country won't vote for a bhuddist president, unless they have no choice
#37 to #35 - Sammael
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
I don't know. What if in the middle of campaign it comes out that other guy is closet gay with communist leanings?
User avatar #41 to #37 - fuzzyballs
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
aren't americans good at digging up "dirt"? those guys wouldn't make it far enough
#36 to #35 - warningomg
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
I would
User avatar #40 to #36 - fuzzyballs
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
you're not a christian country, you're one person
#42 to #40 - warningomg
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
true, but I am a part of a christian country
User avatar #44 to #42 - fuzzyballs
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
again, that's not what I said
don't reply if you have nothing decent to say
User avatar #52 to #35 - SniperKitty
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
We aren't a Christian country though, we are just filled with Christians who like to think we are.
User avatar #66 to #52 - fuzzyballs
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
isn't that the definition of a christian country?
User avatar #75 to #66 - SniperKitty
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
No a Christian country would mean Christianity governed our laws which it does not, they even make churches tax exempt in the US making it illegal for churches to be part of the political process (wish someone would tell the Christians and Catholics that).

We really need to go in and tell the churches that they can either start paying taxes, or start punishments for churches who involve themselves in politics.
#87 to #66 - anon id: 1d1d39d9
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
It is illegal for a President/ the government to endorse a religion, which is where President Ford got into a whole ******** of trouble. So to say we are a Christian country is pretty much going against what American's stand for in the religious sense.
User avatar #69 to #66 - zraxx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
No the definition of a christian country is a country who's laws and regulations are based off of the only religion allowed to hold office, which would be christian.
#193 to #34 - anon id: 527b6f5f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
>Be Buddhist
>Want to be President

Do you really mean it?
User avatar #50 to #34 - SniperKitty
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Haven't you seen the uproar over Obama allegedly being a "Muslim"

Who the **** cares what religion a president is as long as he doesn't govern by it, that's all that should matter.

But in some states you MUST have a belief in a "higher power" in order to hold any government office. It's a law in only a few states, but I can name Texas as one of them off the top of my head because I used to live there. It's in the Texas constitution that someone can't be discriminated against a government office as long as that person has a "belief in a higher power".... aka no Atheists allowed.
User avatar #132 to #50 - slumberdonkey
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Exactly, who the **** cares? So why is it that if an atheist ran for president he would be ******* crucified?
User avatar #218 to #132 - SniperKitty
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Because America is home to fundamental Christians. While the rest of the world experiences loving and accepting Christians, we are over run with the extremists. Ironic that we hate Muslims because they are terrorists, but don't blink an eye when someone burns down a church that accepts homosexuality, we don't make a big deal when abortion clinics are bombed and doctors are shot in cold blood by Christian extremists. We have Christian terrorists here, and nobody wants to see it.
User avatar #74 to #50 - JediismUser
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Yeah I actually just heard about this uproar, I swear the media will take anything and contort it all to hell. Oh **** guys, I have German blood in me, I must HEIL HITLER, clearly. I am not much of a fan on how Obama does things in office, but he needs a ******* break with how the media treats him like a terrorist.
User avatar #225 to #74 - SniperKitty
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Fox News kind of went on a crazy lie spree with Obama, they found anything they could and made it bad. Have you heard them mention the fact that he killed Osama? No, but if it was a GOP president, that **** would be EVERYWHERE right now in the campaign. This is all if you believe that he killed him, I'm skeptical but that's beside the point.

It seems there is a bad air about him that has been spread by the media. Yet you have Romney whining that people are attacking him on his tax returns. Seriously? Look at Obama and the **** he's gone through with the media, he needs to stop his bitching and take it like a man or put his tax returns out.
#107 - I Am Monkey
Reply +28 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
>See post
>"Ok lets see the *********"
>Scroll down to the comments
>All of them are about boiled chicken
>Get to the bottom of the page before realizing I accidentally hit next
>MFW
User avatar #185 - latinotornado
Reply +27 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
What ever happened to seperation of church and state. Why does religion have to be such a factor and why does FJ have to slap it on everything -_-
User avatar #190 to #185 - alikcat
Reply -31 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
I actually think politics and religion is ******* retarded
#236 to #190 - jjristine
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#234 to #190 - anon id: bd5539c7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
>politics and religion is ******* retarded
>and religion is
>is
User avatar #195 to #190 - latinotornado
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Nice to know your opinion bro
#209 to #190 - alikcat
Reply -25 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Yes shower me in red thumbs
User avatar #228 to #209 - trollinginthedeepp
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Don't mind if I do.
User avatar #188 to #185 - alikcat
Reply -27 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
why do you have to be such a a new fag, just accept it
#246 to #185 - anon id: 49d5c432
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Nothing. they didn't follow that law when it was made and they don't follow it now.

because we are a group of cock loving faggots that can't shut the **** up about our opinions, hence why i responded to this comment
User avatar #212 to #185 - eonsmashface
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
it's what happens when we give jobs to people who don't read the constitution.
or any other important document made.
#141 - LowerThanDirtt
Reply +27 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
I can't wait for an openly Muslim presidential candidate. America will **** it's pants
#238 to #141 - zigzagderpaderp
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]
Don't we already?
#166 - rafekee
Reply +26 123456789123345869
(08/21/2012) [-]