Who shall pass?. . Who shall pass?
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (46)
[ 46 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#1 - elburritoextremo
Reply +21 123456789123345869
(08/12/2012) [-]
#28 to #1 - mrcowll
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#3 to #1 - blobti
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(08/12/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#5 to #3 - gaffateip
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(08/12/2012) [-]
I'l bite your leggs off!
#20 - thepiratemonkey
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
User avatar #50 - xapplemanx
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
well this is awkward *points at my profile pic*
User avatar #30 - Endofzeeworld
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
This is what happens, when an immovable object meets an immovable object.
User avatar #31 to #30 - pocoyothegreat
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
^Common definition mistake. This cannot happen. The definition of one of them implies the non-existance of the other in that universe.
User avatar #32 to #31 - Endofzeeworld
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
HYDROPHOBIA. See, I can use big words to make me sound smart too. Its a joke, friend, no need to get anylitical.
And by the way, while we're on the subject of realism, GANDALF IS STANDING IN FRONT OF THE BLACK ******* KNIGHT.
#45 to #32 - bazda
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
After reading this thread, (I get the original joke you were making, btw) it made me think: How exactly would two immovable objects "meet"?
User avatar #47 to #45 - Endofzeeworld
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
When they are forged in the bowels of my anus, they are shat out right next to each other, where they finish fermenting, and become immovable.
User avatar #33 to #32 - pocoyothegreat
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
Well, it would still be realistic: that is the REAL ****!
User avatar #40 to #31 - whitie
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
umm... neither can exist within our understanding of how reality works, and unmovable object would require infinite amounts of mass ---> there's a finite amount of mass in the universe, they just can't exist period with no regards towards if another like it exists
User avatar #43 to #40 - pocoyothegreat
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
No. It's not a matter of understanding. It's a matter of definition. Isaac Asimov alredy answered to that question (what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object?), and he'll explained a lot better than I could.
Still, to make it simple: the definition of immovable object is - an object which state is impossible to change by any force in that universe. The definition of unstoppable force is - a force able to change the state of any object in the universe. As you see, the definitions are contradictory, so can't exist in the same universe. Just semantic.
#48 to #43 - whitie
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
it IS a matter of understanding because we know that
1.the more massive the object is, the more force is required to move it
2. the fact (as far as we know at this point in time) that there is a Finite amount of mass and Energy in our universe

this dictates that there cannot be an infinitely massive object, or an infinitely powerful force

I'm saying that neither could exist in reality, I'm not trying to argue theoreticals, but i am calling you out because of how your reasoning is ******** in that they're not hinged upon each other for their inability to exist,

on top of that the original statement was that there are 2 unmovable objects, no unstoppable force was mentioned, you just corrected a mistake that didn't exist
User avatar #49 to #48 - pocoyothegreat
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
HAHAHAHA. I guess it's a matter of understanding for you, since you lack the minimum required to see that all you just said is irrelevant, as definitions are contradictory and the problem is a semantic nonsense.
On top of that, I wasn't replying to that other answer of you, so your "on top of that" is also nonsense.
User avatar #37 to #30 - whitie
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
i believe you meant when an unstoppable force meets an unmovable object
User avatar #38 to #37 - Endofzeeworld
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
No, I meant what I said. They are both immovable objects, and they met each other.
User avatar #39 to #38 - whitie
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
if they're both unmovable that means they cannot move themselves, so neither shall pass
User avatar #41 to #39 - Endofzeeworld
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
Exactly!
#8 - norwegianlolz
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
#36 - mondprinzessin
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
if someone was to pass them from behind, they would be stuck in between them, as they can't pass in either direction. man that would suck... (pic/gif  un/related)
if someone was to pass them from behind, they would be stuck in between them, as they can't pass in either direction. man that would suck... (pic/gif un/related)
#21 - swimmingprodigy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
for a second i mistook it for this.

Which is an awesome pic btw. Im getting it tattooed when i turn 18
#23 to #21 - anon id: 5c247a33
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
nothing like satan tattooo'd on ur back ******
User avatar #24 to #23 - swimmingprodigy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
wow ur a ******* dumb cunt.
Thats the hermit, known universally for being on the Led Zeppelin IV album cover
User avatar #26 to #24 - taokami
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
well i thought it was Charon the ferryman
#35 to #26 - swimmingprodigy
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
thats pretty cool too, although Im not too familiar with, I think it's Greek mythology? Basically everything i know about Charon I learned from God Of War.
This is actually the tattoo I plan on getting, with the 4 runes
#19 - Chas
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
Pic related
Pic related
#15 - jakectiz
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #11 - slatersniper
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2012) [-]
Just scratch him, Gandalf.