Weird Weapons Comp. Yep... My best weapon related reaction pic. Very interesting stuff there OP
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Weird Weapons Comp

Yep.

+1078
Views: 34529
Favorited: 62
Submitted: 08/04/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to allcontent E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(123):

[ 123 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#23 - lupislord (08/05/2012) [+] (3 replies)
Awesome... now How do I pull Trigger?
User avatar #29 to #23 - MichaelDoritos (08/05/2012) [-]
With your dick.
#1 - housted (08/04/2012) [+] (19 replies)
My best weapon related reaction pic. Very interesting stuff there OP
User avatar #42 - seniorpokeman (08/05/2012) [+] (2 replies)
lol at the first one...
The Russians forgot that they had trained the dogs on their own tanks instead of on German tanks... but the dogs sure as hell didn't, because when they went into battle, they could tell the difference between the Russian and German tanks, and they remembered that they had only ever went to Russian tanks during their training...
Germans: 1
Russians: 0
Dogs: bark
#89 - CIS White Male (08/05/2012) [+] (1 reply)
Yeah about numero uno. The Russians that did it, actually ****** it up because they taught the dogs with their own tanks, which is obviously bad for them.
User avatar #78 - braedenclarkejanze ONLINE (08/05/2012) [-]
Not gonna lie, I love educational **** like this on this website
#75 - GEARBOY (08/05/2012) [-]
Yea, the Russians used this 'idea' at the start of the war. Until they realised that since the dogs were fed under Russian tanks, the dogs could obviously tell the difference between the German ones.
So you had a lot of bomb dogs running under the wrong tanks :L
#97 - jeengak ONLINE (08/05/2012) [+] (1 reply)
is it wrong for me to feel more sorry for the dogs than the children and wife killed?
User avatar #12 - hadrian ONLINE (08/04/2012) [+] (6 replies)
On the first one, you forgot to include that they discontinued the use of dog bombs because the dogs were trained on Russian tanks and not Panzers, so the dogs were blowing up Russian tanks when put into service.

Also, the United States developed the bat bomb. Bats would be dropped over a Japanese city with napalm bombs attached to them so when they land in the wooden buildings they would explode. It was effective, but never put into service because it was too late in the war and the budget was shifted to the Manhatten Project.
#55 - cdroid (08/05/2012) [+] (2 replies)
not the dogs you sick bastards.
User avatar #24 - qqqqqqqqq ONLINE (08/05/2012) [-]
micro spy guns? no. gunsmiths used to make very tiny working guns as a hobby and to advertise how skilled they were with very fine tolerances
#116 - happyhadgrenade (08/05/2012) [-]
This has probably been posted.
But the 'Dog Bombs' backfired, as they were trained on Russian tanks, so when they went into battle, they associated the Russian tanks with food, and so ran straight underneath them.
#56 - dontshoot (08/05/2012) [-]
number 2. the guns were designed for tank crews. i soldiers were climbing on their tank they could open the hatch and spray down the hull
User avatar #11 - brendanc (08/04/2012) [+] (1 reply)
I heard that the dogs went under their own tanks because that they weren't trained using enemy tanks
#17 to #11 - midgetnigger (08/04/2012) [-]
Yup, that is correct! They also would get scared ******** on the battlefield because of the sound of gunfire and explosions, so they'd run back to their handlers in the bunkers and/or hide under friendly tanks, triggering the explosives and BOOM! Massive failure for Russia!

<------ The dogs the Russians used.
+2
#98 - graemearg **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (3 replies)
#85 - CIS White Male (08/05/2012) [+] (4 replies)
#2 don't make sense. If it's rifled, the bullet would go straight through and **** the barrel up with that curve. It wouldn't curve inside the barrel.
User avatar #79 - darkcow (08/05/2012) [+] (2 replies)
"War... War never changes..."
User avatar #122 - satakas (08/05/2012) [+] (12 replies)
#4 - NO, they weren't spy guns. get real, moron!
User avatar #127 to #122 - allcontent (08/05/2012) [-]
youre ******* retarded.
User avatar #102 - tommycallahan (08/05/2012) [+] (1 reply)
Some more info on the curved barrels. The Germans first used them in WWII as a solution to their Russian anti-tank personnel problem. The idea was they could stick the barrels out of the tanks and kill the Russian troops but like OP said the bullets just turned to shrapnel when they hit the curve.
#106 to #102 - justanotherpsyco (08/05/2012) [-]
i'm sorry, but a shotgun that shoots around corners sounds pretty awesome to me, just saying.
User avatar #80 - Noah (08/05/2012) [+] (6 replies)
I don't believe 2 and 3
#83 to #82 - boomdady (08/05/2012) [-]
Germany had the V1 rocket, the first of it's kind and they were also developing the first Jet engine technology,

WWII was the age where effective tanks, airplanes, and automatic guns were the new war tool. So the idea of a rocket that could travel hundreds of miles and strike a target on it's own was revolutionary.

Although in the end the US was the country that developed a working Atomic Bomb. Germany was working on one, but the US beat them to it
#34 - steelhawk (08/05/2012) [-]
the first one was a complete fail. the Russians trained the dogs to run under t-34's and IS-2's instead of German ones. the dogs did the same on the battle ground
[ 123 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)