Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#208 - xxxsonic fanxxx (05/02/2010) [-]
15 is false. The Moon has a very thin atmosphere. How else would people be even able to LAND on it. If there was no atmosphere (and therefore no gravity) the men jumping on the moon would have floated away.
User avatar #231 to #208 - BeyondBirthdayL (05/02/2010) [-]
They DO float away. Why the **** do you think they need cords attached to their suits that connect to the ship?
Just because something has a magnetic or gravitation pull does not mean the area is capable of holding oxygen to have atmosphere.

Go kill yourself before you reproduce with your cousin and create an even more retarded child than yourself.
User avatar #240 to #231 - InsaneMainframe (05/03/2010) [-]
i've already replied to this. the moon has an atmosphere. Minute and insignificant as it is, it DOES. a discovery of this magnitude requires only the input of "moon atmosphere" into the google input bar
User avatar #224 to #208 - Vorkosigan (05/02/2010) [-]
Please don't reproduce.
User avatar #223 to #208 - ThatDamnCanadian (05/02/2010) [-]
Gravity does not equal atmosphere.
are you stupid?
#213 to #208 - DashDashTS (05/02/2010) [-]
You fail physics forever.
User avatar #239 to #213 - InsaneMainframe (05/03/2010) [-]
actually..."Okay... that's not exactly true. The Moon does have a tiny atmosphere." quoted from [url deleted] and its subsection "Atmosphere of the moon"

replace (dot) with an actual period. I've also researched other sources dictating that the moon does have a slight modicum of atmosphere, almost completely insignificant, but it does have one.

so it in fact doesn't fail physics forever, you fail at research forever

look up "moon atmosphere" in google for christs sake. its there retard :P
#244 to #239 - DashDashTS (05/03/2010) [-]
Are you seriously that mind-numbingly stupid? For the sake of my own sanity I'm just going to assume you're tolling but I'll bite anyway. The moon having an atmosphere is irrelevant to this discussion. He claimed that without atmosphere the moon's gravity would be unable to pull anything towards its center of mass which is a complete failure in understand of how gravity works. The formula is well known, why don't you google it?
User avatar #246 to #244 - InsaneMainframe (05/03/2010) [-]
no, i was actually adressing the original basis of his argument, that, and i quote "15 is false". Did i ever say "the moon has an atmosphere and that is why there is gravity?" no, I said "there is an atmosphere" after many said there wasn't one. Because there is. sure, he's an idiot and has no idea how gravity lies in relation to the atmosphere of a planet, but i expect you're not equally mind-numbingly stupid as you assume i am, and should realise im just adressing a fact, not proving you wrong. jerk
#247 to #246 - DashDashTS (05/04/2010) [-]
I'm pretty sure the only thing I said was "You fail physics forever." This was the first comment posted in reference to him and there was no follow-up by me so how you translated "you fail physics forever" into "The moon doesn't have an atmosphere" is beyond me. You then want off on some rant regarding atmospheric chemistry and called me a retard with a follow-up condescending "google it" comment. Then YOU called ME a jerk. Awesome.
User avatar #248 to #247 - InsaneMainframe (05/04/2010) [-]
read number 15. i was disproving that. i just happened to reply to YOURS because it was at the end of the group attacking the true idiot here. you are a jerk. I've done nothing to viciously attack you personally. call me "mind-numbingly stupid". you are a jerk. get over it. sorry i misappropriated the "fail at research". i'd assumed you were talking about the lack of atmosphere, not the correlation between atmosphere and gravity. and i apologize for that and any other insult resulting from my misconstruement of your blatant "you fail" quote
#249 to #248 - DashDashTS (05/04/2010) [-]
"I've done nothing to viciously attack you personally"
-I'm pretty sure calling me a retard qualifies as attacking me personally especially considering I hadn't even said anything to you yet.

"you are a jerk, you are a jerk, get over it, you are jerk"
-Yeah...
User avatar #250 to #249 - InsaneMainframe (05/04/2010) [-]
now you're in a digression much farther than i've ever been. way to out do yourself. i apologized. at least i have that capability. This is all I have to say. I overreacted when i assumed,when you were telling him he "failed at physics", that you thought there was no atmosphere, when there was, and that is why i responded the way i did and attempted to correct the thought process of what i, admittidly unjustifiably, saw to be idiotic and angrily ignorant. that is why i said what i said. because i knew there was an atmosphere. i read his "15 is wrong" and your retaliation, and assumed you thought otherwise. sure he's a moron, but the first 3 words of his sentence are correct.
#251 to #250 - DashDashTS (05/04/2010) [-]
"i apologized. at least i have that capability"
-Do you normally preface and end your apologies with "You're a jerk" and "get over it?" Sorry if i took it as disingenuous, I'm not used to apologies being laced with insults. Is thumbing down all of my comments part of the apology as well?
User avatar #252 to #251 - InsaneMainframe (05/05/2010) [-]
i think im in love
#263 to #252 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/12/2010) [-]
Jeez people, Armstrong has stepped on it before, why can't you cite that instead of making a big argument half the page long?
 Friends (0)