| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
If Heaven is real, awesome, i'm a good Christian, if it isn't, oh well. On the other hand, if Hell is real and you're atheist, sucks to be you, and if it isn't, oh well. No negatives to being Christian, but I respect the views of Atheists.
You're fucking kidding me right? It could be that after death, only Christians go to hell and Atheists are rewarded and have the most comfortable spots in heaven. Wanna know the real bad part about being a Christian? Being this fucking stupid right here^
BTW Pascal's Wager is one of the shittiest defenses for religion ever made... Philosophers love to make fun of it.
Though it's not as bad as Descartes' defense for god. Everything that exists has a form. The essence of the object. A perfect circle for instance. That perfect circle can only exist in thought because reality cannot allow for a surface with no edges.
When one tries to imagine the form of God they must imagine perfection. Perfection necessitates existence, therefore God exists. Now you may think this could justify saying that the perfect circle exists but the form of the circle does not require existence. The form of God does.
It's a stupid theory because it's just a medley of assumptions. Assuming perfection necessitates existence, assuming the imagined form of God is the real form of God. etc. etc.
Though it's not as bad as Descartes' defense for god. Everything that exists has a form. The essence of the object. A perfect circle for instance. That perfect circle can only exist in thought because reality cannot allow for a surface with no edges.
When one tries to imagine the form of God they must imagine perfection. Perfection necessitates existence, therefore God exists. Now you may think this could justify saying that the perfect circle exists but the form of the circle does not require existence. The form of God does.
It's a stupid theory because it's just a medley of assumptions. Assuming perfection necessitates existence, assuming the imagined form of God is the real form of God. etc. etc.
I agree, but Pascal's Wager is not the sole reason I'm Christian, not even a major part. I love going to Church every Sunday and meeting the genuinely nice folk, donating a few bucks so we can, as a group, clean up some run-down houses, but in the end, Heaven is why I'm Christian. Even if it isn't real; to look forward to something that amazing is one heck of an incentive to be a good person. And if I believe in Heaven, why not believe in Pascal's Wager as well? If anything it strengthens my Faith, it teches me that there is no sense doubting God or Heaven because the alternative is fear of Hell.
Here I go, arguing like I said I wouldn't, i'm done, you can have the last word.
Here I go, arguing like I said I wouldn't, i'm done, you can have the last word.
someone appears to have thumbed down all my comments... pity...
Just remember, no one will ever look fondly on Pascal's Wager... You can like it all you want... but in any discussion of religious faith and where you derive it from... if you use that Wager as a way to strengthen your faith you'll just get raped by all the philosophy majors in the group xD
Just remember, no one will ever look fondly on Pascal's Wager... You can like it all you want... but in any discussion of religious faith and where you derive it from... if you use that Wager as a way to strengthen your faith you'll just get raped by all the philosophy majors in the group xD
A God-fearing Christian is considered a good Christian. If we didn't fear Hell, what reason would we have to go to Church or pursue Heaven when there is no alternative?
If you're a good Christian, then there is no reason to have true fear, only a reason to continue doing what you are doing.
If you're a good Christian, then there is no reason to have true fear, only a reason to continue doing what you are doing.
Waaaaait a second. Hold up there, bub.
1) What do you mean, we can't explain it. High school teachers can explain it. CHILDREN can explain it. There are VIDEO GAMES about it.
2) "Ever since evolution has been thought of mankind still hasn't been able to do it ourselves therefore there has to be a divine being." We've evolved a LOT since cavemen. I'm not covered in thick, wiry, pubic-like hair, have an IQ of 124, and have the fine motor skills to type. Every generation (up until this last couple, wtf is going on) has had an increase of 20 IQ points on average. That's evolution. It's happening.
1) What do you mean, we can't explain it. High school teachers can explain it. CHILDREN can explain it. There are VIDEO GAMES about it.
2) "Ever since evolution has been thought of mankind still hasn't been able to do it ourselves therefore there has to be a divine being." We've evolved a LOT since cavemen. I'm not covered in thick, wiry, pubic-like hair, have an IQ of 124, and have the fine motor skills to type. Every generation (up until this last couple, wtf is going on) has had an increase of 20 IQ points on average. That's evolution. It's happening.
I apologize, my statement was indeed incorrect. I do not know why i mistook the word evolution with the big band. What I meant to say was atheist can not explain the big bang anymore than Christians can explain God. Sorry I have no clue why I mixed those two things up.
except for the fact that there are hundreds of different religions that tell you that you'll go to hell if you aren't their religion...
Also you make it seem as if there are no sacrifices involved in being religious... there are plenty of logical issues that you just have to live with in order to keep your faith...
Also you make it seem as if there are no sacrifices involved in being religious... there are plenty of logical issues that you just have to live with in order to keep your faith...