| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
HURRRR DURRR
Uploaded by: boringusername
i lune arguing politics with peopie.. because i win like a bass.
unly there m stupid tty see that there wrong which is huw they
got in be wrung in the first place.. and that' s why we have sticks
m bludgeon them with.
El 5 people like this.
There is 5 difference in THERE. a. AND
THEYRE,
about an hour age via mobile . Unlike - , I
my , and its nut big enough in the
fur they' re to warranted., its A small gray line.
about an hum ago - Like
its gram magically correct hun W...
about an hour age via mobile . Like
nu its still really nut.. its either er. and
depend if stating like i am or talking to an individual,
about an hour age - Like
There is a place m thing... they’ re refers to a
group ppa... and their refers to ownership,.,
about an hour age via mobile . Like
1- You ready dunt want m this..
about an hum ago - Like
I ‘English was my shit in schools knew what
doing bye :1
about an hum ago via mobile - Like
it well then nu you dunt. i used it correctly,
yuur thinking simple definition I i used there to describe a
nun existing persun er unspecific persun. "its there are
stupid in this world" nut They are (the/ re) stupid people in
this wurld. however, it wouldl he if i said that while painting at
a group of peopie m persun.
59 minutes age - Like
again like Maid its a contextual gray Aine..
58 minutes age - Like
I - You said "there tee stupid to see" ypu should
have said "they/ re mu stupid to see"
54 minutes age hcia mobile - Like
i would have if i was talking abaut a specific
persun er "rfi had previously., i didnt.. i also an m nut too..,
too is incorrect as wed.
47 minutes age - Like
unly there m stupid tty see that there wrong which is huw they
got in be wrung in the first place.. and that' s why we have sticks
m bludgeon them with.
El 5 people like this.
There is 5 difference in THERE. a. AND
THEYRE,
about an hour age via mobile . Unlike - , I
my , and its nut big enough in the
fur they' re to warranted., its A small gray line.
about an hum ago - Like
its gram magically correct hun W...
about an hour age via mobile . Like
nu its still really nut.. its either er. and
depend if stating like i am or talking to an individual,
about an hour age - Like
There is a place m thing... they’ re refers to a
group ppa... and their refers to ownership,.,
about an hour age via mobile . Like
1- You ready dunt want m this..
about an hum ago - Like
I ‘English was my shit in schools knew what
doing bye :1
about an hum ago via mobile - Like
it well then nu you dunt. i used it correctly,
yuur thinking simple definition I i used there to describe a
nun existing persun er unspecific persun. "its there are
stupid in this world" nut They are (the/ re) stupid people in
this wurld. however, it wouldl he if i said that while painting at
a group of peopie m persun.
59 minutes age - Like
again like Maid its a contextual gray Aine..
58 minutes age - Like
I - You said "there tee stupid to see" ypu should
have said "they/ re mu stupid to see"
54 minutes age hcia mobile - Like
i would have if i was talking abaut a specific
persun er "rfi had previously., i didnt.. i also an m nut too..,
too is incorrect as wed.
47 minutes age - Like
...
| |
#712
-
iFail (06/30/2012) [+]
(1 reply)
So, here's a summary of what just happened:
OP posted this picture and the main reaction from everybody was: "oh shit, that red guy is fucking retarded."
Now, it turns out that OP is the red guy, and posted this picture with the intention of impressing everybody with how he used his amazing knowledge of grammar to win an argument. (Which he didn't of course.)
Now, OP is butthurt and deleting everybody's comments that say anything bad about "the red guy" because it was him all along. Shit, this image is so much of a failure that it's actually a win.
OP posted this picture and the main reaction from everybody was: "oh shit, that red guy is fucking retarded."
Now, it turns out that OP is the red guy, and posted this picture with the intention of impressing everybody with how he used his amazing knowledge of grammar to win an argument. (Which he didn't of course.)
Now, OP is butthurt and deleting everybody's comments that say anything bad about "the red guy" because it was him all along. Shit, this image is so much of a failure that it's actually a win.
Am I getting extremely trolled here or have I missed something? English isn't my native tounge so don't judge me too hard.
I always thought "they're" means "they are" and that "there" is a location/specific point.
Correct me now please, but saying "There are alot of people" surely can't be "They are are alot of people"?
Am I stupid or trolled? Or both?
I always thought "they're" means "they are" and that "there" is a location/specific point.
Correct me now please, but saying "There are alot of people" surely can't be "They are are alot of people"?
Am I stupid or trolled? Or both?
OP for the sake of human kind, don't breed. Ever. You are quite possibly one of the most puerile and inane example of a human being I've ever had the displeasure of seeing. Oh, and your grasp of the English language is asinine at best.
I don't even know what either of them said... They were both horribly grammatically incorrect, and neither used appropriate punctuation.
#914
-
N. Korean citizen (07/01/2012) [-]
OP is the guy in red.
This post is only getting thumbs because OP is retarded.
This post is only getting thumbs because OP is retarded.
#867
-
uncontrollablelol (06/30/2012) [+]
(9 replies)
Welcome to the comments. Where OP is so butthurt he's deleting comments.
So if you're new to this thread, enjoy OPs faggotry.
So if you're new to this thread, enjoy OPs faggotry.
#276
-
N. Korean citizen (06/30/2012) [+]
(5 replies)
red used there, instead of they're. WRONG
oh and he used __your_ instead of you're. **WRONG** again. He's so fucking cocky about his wrong answers too, makes me chuckle. I don't get it, was this a bash against red's post or is red OP and he's a fucking faggot?
oh and he used __your_ instead of you're. **WRONG** again. He's so fucking cocky about his wrong answers too, makes me chuckle. I don't get it, was this a bash against red's post or is red OP and he's a fucking faggot?
I love how this has made it so far because everyone seems to think initially that the guy in red is some random on OP's wall that is just fucking retarded... Nope, it's actually OP. Well, he stepped right into a big pile of shit. Good job.