Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #69 - latinotornado (06/28/2012) [-]
OP...oh god people like you deserve to be beat to death by a History Teacher with a History Book -_- The nuking of Japan was very sad yes it was. But it had to be done. People were dying on both ends. We warned Japan, Japan ignored us. It had to be done, and we ended the war. Yes the bomb killed many many MANY people. But it also saved countless others by ending the war. Now 9/11... **** yourself for even saying that OP. 9/11 was a terrorist attack. We were not at war, and they killed purley civilians and took away our rights by doing that! Americans lost their sence of security and the country startin goin down a steep hill. Red thumbs inbound or not i dont give a flying **** !! 9/11 is a serious topic to me. Im a tolerant guy, im catholic and deal with all the christian jokes in the world from douchbag atheists and hispanic jokes from racists. But whenever i see a 9/11 joke i lose my ****** mind. Ide like to see OP walk up to the widow of someone who died in the 9/11 attack and laugh in her face. Or laugh in the face of a child whos father never game home on the day of September 11th. **** yourself OP...Seriously **** yourself.
#1427 to #69 - iisammehii (06/29/2012) [-]
AH HA HAH! You seriously lose your **** over a 9/11 joke? Seriously, go **** yourself. 9/11 is not the worst thing to happen in the world. Get the **** over yourselves, sure you can feel mad about it and be all sad and such bu when it comes to losing your rag at people who make a joke about it? **** you.
User avatar #1480 to #1427 - bdevils (06/29/2012) [-]
thousands died you **** wit. I agree that some people can be a little overly bitter about some jokes but that doesnt change the fact that thousands died and changed the course of America. As was said before, how would you feel if you were one of the children of one of those men that died in those towers? Or how would you feel if you were one of those firemen that have to think about that day each and every moment for the rest of their lives. Have some respect.
User avatar #1689 to #1480 - iisammehii (06/29/2012) [-]
Thousand died, no **** . Of course I feel bad for them but when you can't accept a joke or lose the rag and protest against a joke, then it's just clearly unfair.
User avatar #1478 to #1427 - latinotornado (06/29/2012) [-]
you wanna calm down bro?i never said 9/11 is the worst thing to happen in the world. Im jus saying its a huge tragidy that shouldnt be made fun of.get the **** over ourselves?your not even making any sence. you sound like some pissed off lil 12 year old trying to start a fight for no reason.go masturbate their young blood and lose some steam
User avatar #1690 to #1478 - iisammehii (06/29/2012) [-]
You obviously didn't get my point. My point is that if you can't accept a joke and PROTEST against the jokes then you're pathetic and it's really unfair. Sure you don't need to find them funny but there's no need to take the higher level and be stuck up as **** then protest about it on the internet.

I bet you probably laugh at other jokes where people have died or suffered in any shape or form. Don't get so ******* stuck up as soon as someone insults your precious 9/11.
User avatar #1697 to #1690 - latinotornado (06/30/2012) [-]
ok,ur obviously ignorant, so ill try and change perspectives here.lets say your mother or father,basically a close close family member died in an accident. How would you feel if people mocked and made fun of the death of that person all the time to you. and when you finally get fed up and tell errybody who makes the jokes to stfu and stop makin those jokes, they make even more fun of you saying that you cant take a joke and your pathetic for it.and i dont laugh at other jokes where people die. death isent funny to me.suffering isent funny to me so theres no reason to laugh at sick jokes like You need to login to view this link not stuck up either i dont know how u derived that from what ive said bc ive displayed nothing about my personality untill now. saying a joke isent funny isent being stuck up.
User avatar #1698 to #1697 - iisammehii (06/30/2012) [-]
No **** death isn't funny, it's the event that's made into jokes, not the tragic deaths. What I'm saying is just ignore it, stop telling people not to make jokes about something just because you can't take it.
User avatar #1699 to #1698 - latinotornado (06/30/2012) [-]
I can see the point your trying to make now that your not being a prick. And if death isent funny, then how are the events that involve the death funny?Wuts funny about 9/11 please tell. I dont understand the need to make jokes about it. Look i cant stop anyone from doin anything, but im showing my own god damn opinion. your the one who got uppity over my opinion.so please just stop all uve done is embarrass yourself
User avatar #1700 to #1699 - iisammehii (06/30/2012) [-]
I've not embarrassed myself, because what I'm saying is correct. The event is not funny, the deaths are not funny, it's the jokes to some people. Like any joke that is making fun of someone, sometimes the joke is not literally applied but just a play on words or a view from a different aspect.

Sure your showing your own opinion, but your original statement was more of a "Stop doing it; you're sick for laughing at 9/11 jokes etc etc" which really is just a direct stab at those who have a light hearted chuckle at seeing Nyan Cat fly through the towers instead of planes. Now how is that mocking the deaths? How is that mocking the event? It's simply a play on what is presented, like a play on words but with a picture.
User avatar #1701 to #1700 - latinotornado (06/30/2012) [-]
I never said "stop doing it" dont put quotation marks on something if its not true you ****** dumbass.you just embarrassed urself even more.and wuts the point of doing that?Nyan cat crashing through the twin towers killing thousands of people oh yea thats so funny.iisammehii jus **** off -_-
User avatar #1702 to #1701 - iisammehii (06/30/2012) [-]
Wow, I thought I was actually having a discussion with someone capable of understanding what I'm trying to say. When I quoted, I was trying to summarise briefly.

The Nyan cat thing is funny because it is shopped well and says "Nyan-11" which is a delectably nice choice of words wouldn't you say? What the real reason here is, you're butthurt make jokes about 9/11 yet you've probably just let Titanic jokes, tsunami jokes, holocaust jokes and any other joke just slide without saying a word.

You obviously mis-understand what a joke is, a joke is not liked by everyone, this one obviously not by you but I despise your ignorant attitude. "Don't make fun of 9/11 it was terrible... although carry on making other jokes based around tragic events"

If you protest against one, you protest against the other.
User avatar #1703 to #1702 - latinotornado (06/30/2012) [-]
when did i ever say "go ahead and make jokes of other tragic events" jesus your a ****** idiot -_- your pullin **** outta ur ass that i never even said.i hate holocaust jokes and ive never heard any tsunami jokes and im sure their as retarded as 9/11 jokes. Titanic jokes arent that funny either.shut the **** up already your arguments are invalid
User avatar #1706 to #1703 - iisammehii (06/30/2012) [-]
*I wasn't quoting you
User avatar #1705 to #1703 - iisammehii (06/30/2012) [-]
Oh my god, I was quoting you you ******* retard. It was an interpretation. Holy **** , I bet you're a moronic sad little Christian that really doesn't understand the basis of ENGLISH LANGUAGE.

Do you KNOW what a ******* joke IS? SOMETHING NOT TO BE TAKEN SENEED TO HEAR THE AGAIN? NOT. TO. BE. TAKEN. SERIOUSLY.

Seriously, get it into your ******* brain dead skull. You are the scourge of this earth. You really need to lighten the **** up and let people have their fun.

Once again, just incase you didn't get that.

A joke. Is not meant to be taken. Seriously.
#1384 to #69 - anonymous (06/29/2012) [-]
if you are catholic, why you sed " **** "
also you are ****
User avatar #997 to #69 - lordmoldywart (06/29/2012) [-]
The majority that you killed in those bombings were innocent civilians

A ******* nuke was unnecessary for such a mission
User avatar #1516 to #997 - bdevils (06/29/2012) [-]
I'm not gonna repeat what has now been but so many times in this thread, read some of the other comments and I think you will see that you are highly disagreed with because of historic fact.
User avatar #1549 to #1516 - lordmoldywart (06/29/2012) [-]
Historic fact only proves my point

The innocent civilians had nothing to do with the war, and it was inhumane what happened to them

Typical American over-the-top collateral damage
User avatar #1565 to #1549 - bdevils (06/29/2012) [-]
that isn't my point though. they were warned numerous times what was coming and still refused to listen. They didn't even want to give up after the first bomb was dropped. they fought to the death and most historians will agree that many, MANY more would have died if the bomb would not have been dropped. What about all of the innocent people that Japan killed in China? They had nothing to do with the war either. It was inhuman what happened to them.


Slightly unknown fact: if the Japanese did not surrender after the second bombing, the U.S. were going to drop a bomb on Tokyo.
User avatar #1707 to #1565 - iisammehii (06/30/2012) [-]
You didn't get his point. The civilians had no part in the decision, it wasn't their fault, they still died. Think of all the genetic mutations that occur in children around Hiroshima because of that nuke. Very, very unfair and brutal.
#745 to #69 - anonymous (06/29/2012) [-]
YES!!! I don't feel like I'm alone anymore when I thumb down the retarded American hate or 9/11 joke posts.

They get the front page but honestly don't deserve to be. Just a bunch of 12 year olds thumbing up because they think its funny or rebellious to step out of bounds or go against their home country.

This is funny junk not "look at me and my new disrespectful opinion junk"
#733 to #69 - anonymous (06/29/2012) [-]
America deserved it and I wish your whole ****** country could be destroyed. You're all a bunch of fat ***** that only care about taking other countries oil. If I went over there and saw a child of a casualty or a survivor, I would laugh my ass off. And what would they do? I could run and they would never catch up because they have to lug around there 500 pound asses. **** America, you stupid cunt. BUT I do agree that OP was in the wrong, it was just PLANEwrong ;) lolol xD
User avatar #1488 to #733 - bdevils (06/29/2012) [-]
first of all, I see you didn't have the balls to log in and say it, two, who the hell favorited this? I'm assuming it was probably the spineless person that posted this in the first place. Third, we aren't even the fattest country in the world, I hate that stereotype. Fourth, you wouldnt laugh in their faces, I would assume you are a human being and I don't think any human being could bring it upon themselves to laugh in the face of a child that has lost his or her's mother or father. They would never catch up? I'm thinking you might be one of these people that "have to lug around there 500 pound asses." I honestly think you are probably some american kid that is probably sitting in the house that his parents paid for because they had the freedom to do it. I'm not religious but God bless America and you can burn in hell.
#1686 to #1488 - anonymous (06/29/2012) [-]
lolololollol u mad. Y u mad? and no, i am not american, if i was, i would have killed myself. yes i would, everyone who died in 9/11 deserved it for being a fat american cunt. i would laugh in there faces. and they might catch up, seeing as how all americans get around on little scooters xD. **** america, where you eat all day and steal oil by night. ******* fat ass cunts
#1687 to #1686 - bdevils (06/29/2012) [-]
your trolling is kinda sad..
User avatar #1198 to #733 - conselasrevenge (06/29/2012) [-]
You are an asshole we are all not that fat and stereotypical as we are made out to be it's like saying the all have ****** up teeth or Austrailians fight alligators and 9/11 is not funny
#674 to #69 - anonymous (06/29/2012) [-]
That's not the point though. yes it was a tragic event and lots of bladabladablah. We get it. the point of the post is saying that 9/11 was not the worst thing to ever happen in history.
You preach of being a history buff, but you seem to ignore all the other **** that's happened post and pre-9/11.
Secondly, the bombs on Japan were dropped in populated areas, with millions of civilians, im sure they were as excited to get bombed as we were.
Who cares if its wartime or not? the point is that people died, its unfair, lets all have a big fat pity party for poor ol 'Merica who cant even stop being self-centered enough to realize that it's not the ******* end of the world.
tldr; What comes around goes around.
#1475 to #674 - bdevils (06/29/2012) [-]
don't mean to sound like an ass but in the lines of what you are saying, it isn't the end of the world for Japan either. Japan was killing millions of Chinese, so they got what they had  coming. Not to mention, we were not at war with Japan when they decided to bomb Pearl Harbor destroying a good portion of the U.S. Naval fleet. So on your logic, they had it coming. Also, New York is one of the most populated areas in the United States. So the plane was put in a populated area along with the bombs on Japan. I think it is safe to say I've destroyed a good portion of your argument.
don't mean to sound like an ass but in the lines of what you are saying, it isn't the end of the world for Japan either. Japan was killing millions of Chinese, so they got what they had coming. Not to mention, we were not at war with Japan when they decided to bomb Pearl Harbor destroying a good portion of the U.S. Naval fleet. So on your logic, they had it coming. Also, New York is one of the most populated areas in the United States. So the plane was put in a populated area along with the bombs on Japan. I think it is safe to say I've destroyed a good portion of your argument.
-3
#639 to #69 - sniperfusion has deleted their comment [-]
-2
#661 to #639 - sniperfusion has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #748 to #661 - meganinja (06/29/2012) [-]
Actually, we had broken the Japanese code long before this, and so the higher ups knew that Japan was going to declare war on us and attack us on December 7th. So when the Japanese Ambassador went to deliver the declaration of war (it did take a while to translate so he only had 2 hours before the attack started) They told him the secretary of state (or whoever the **** he was giving it to, I forgot) was busy, and wouldn't be available for a few hours. He tried to give it to the secretaries but they wouldn't let them. So he just waited there.

I'll give you that, but that and the Japanese internment camps were the only things I think the US did that was douchy during WWII. I agree that the bombings were needed.

Nowadays I can't really say as i don't know top secret information. I think we stick our noses into too much **** , and sometimes we are actually a help to the people who need it, but sometimes we just **** things up.
#485 to #69 - anonymous (06/29/2012) [-]
America knew days in advance of the Pearl Harbor attack but let it happen so they had an excuse to enter WWII to show off their supremacy and use the military that they had heavily invested in. 9/11 is a similar story, no way could two untrained 'pilots' fly through one of the busiest air traffic routes and not be noticed by NORAD (who's sole purpose is to stops attacks like it).

America let 9/11 happen for a reason to go to Iraq, where it actually turned out that they had nothing to do with the attack as there were no WMDs or al Qaeda (a term created by the CIA). If you look at civilian casualties, hundreds of thousands of Middle-Easterns have been killed by American forces who 'liberate' their countries, in comparison to the measly 3000 killed in the 9/11 attacks. Thousands of people die everyday in devastating events, only when it happens in America do people give two ***** .
User avatar #827 to #485 - Bigelow (06/29/2012) [-]
Do you believe all the ******* conspiracy theories you see?
#209 to #69 - anonymous (06/28/2012) [-]
Same for me. I'm Muslim and 9/11 jokes hit hard because so many innocent people got killed, especially Muslims in the Middle East because of this stupid attack. Don't BS me with the "war on terror" stuff if most casualties were civilians and many people's lives were ruined- not just in Iraq/Afghanistan, but also in the US.
User avatar #1245 to #209 - latinotornado (06/29/2012) [-]
Im sorry if anyone ever mocks you for being a muslim. Not many people understand what being a muslim is. I myself dont know a whole lot either.but thank you for not being an asshole :) ha
User avatar #200 to #69 - latinotornado (06/28/2012) [-]
look at what i started lol I knew i was gunna get thumbed down. within like 5 mins after i posted the comment it was at like -3 or sumthen like that. I stuck by it and i hit positive 20 ha THANKS FOR ALL THE LOVE AND SUPPORTHAPPY CAPSLOCK DAY
#431 to #200 - drillur (06/29/2012) [-]
cool story
User avatar #145 to #144 - iamannon (06/28/2012) [-]
..not 9/11... people like you...
-7
#134 to #69 - TheAnonymousRebel **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
0
#101 to #69 - captainsteelback **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #82 to #69 - zzforrest (06/28/2012) [-]
THING IS that this guy is right.

Hiroshima bomb was during war.
9/11 was when we were in peace times.

Also Japan attacked during peace with them , just as we were gonna ally with them and they attacked on a SUNDAY for ***** sake.
User avatar #1704 to #82 - iisammehii (06/30/2012) [-]
Then what about Tsunami jokes? Those are tossed around all the time.
User avatar #129 to #82 - Shramin (06/28/2012) [-]
Not stating either side as correct, I'd just like to point out this:

"War on Terrorism"
"Terror War"
"Fighting back against terrorists from another country"

hiding behind the word terrorism doesn't change the fact that the US was at war when 9/11 happened. using the excuse that one was at war time and one wasn't isn't really sufficient.

just saying.
User avatar #300 to #129 - keiishiyama (06/29/2012) [-]
We haven't been in a war since World War II. We've fought in other countries across the world, but we've never declared war and never been at war since 1945.
User avatar #316 to #300 - Shramin (06/29/2012) [-]
Ok the US was fighting in the middle east while not in the war, therefore the enemy should consider you friends, because you know you weren't at war.

Perspective is important you know, just because nobody declares that its a war on your side, doesn't mean the other side hasn't.
User avatar #159 to #129 - skeery (06/28/2012) [-]
The war on terrorism happened BECAUSE of 9/11

partially
User avatar #174 to #159 - Shramin (06/28/2012) [-]
lol at the partially, the stuff happening in the middle east with the US started in the mid 90's if not sooner.
#98 to #82 - Lawlor ONLINE (06/28/2012) [-]
But didn't they attack because the US cut off their oil?/

I mean, you're kind of making Japan out to be pure evil here and the US were just the innocents who got unfairly attacked.
User avatar #701 to #98 - meganinja (06/29/2012) [-]
Because it's perfectly reasonable to give oil to people you suspect are going to attack you.
#125 to #98 - anonymous (06/28/2012) [-]
We cut off their oil because they were conquering Asia and committing massive atrocities. How are we the bad guys for cutting off relations with them?
User avatar #132 to #125 - Lawlor ONLINE (06/28/2012) [-]
To be fair, I never said you were the bad guys.
That is still a title firmly held by Japan, in this context.

My point was just that the US isn't a perfect country that did absolutely nothing with even slightly ill intent.

#117 to #98 - newall (06/28/2012) [-]
i'm gonna remain firmly out of this fine ********* you've got yourself here, but the taliban didn't start a war on 9/11, they simply opened the world's eyes to it, there's been conflict with the middle-east over oil for the last half a century, it was just kept mostly out of the public eye un-till 9/11.
User avatar #122 to #117 - Lawlor ONLINE (06/28/2012) [-]
I'm not really in a ********* .

One guy asked about my comment.
The other guy calmly elaborated on what I missed.

That's kind of it.
#124 to #122 - newall (06/28/2012) [-]
yeah i meant the whole "was nagasaki/hiroshima right or wrong" ********* .

your conversation was relatively civil.
User avatar #127 to #124 - Lawlor ONLINE (06/28/2012) [-]
Ah! I misunderstood, sorry.

Yeah there is QUITE a ********* going on here.
#108 to #98 - thatarmybrat (06/28/2012) [-]
Yes, we did.  Because Hideki Tojo was allying and assisting the Russians with transport of weapons and machinery to Nazi Germany, whom, according to the Treaty of Paris, which quite  few European powers agreed to after WW1, was not even allowed to maintain a military lest for defensive purposes.  We cut them off as an attempt to stop their attempt to help Hitler mechanize Germany for European takeover.  inb4 saving our asses like any like minded country would have done.
Yes, we did. Because Hideki Tojo was allying and assisting the Russians with transport of weapons and machinery to Nazi Germany, whom, according to the Treaty of Paris, which quite few European powers agreed to after WW1, was not even allowed to maintain a military lest for defensive purposes. We cut them off as an attempt to stop their attempt to help Hitler mechanize Germany for European takeover. inb4 saving our asses like any like minded country would have done.
#116 to #108 - Lawlor ONLINE (06/28/2012) [-]
Ah, thanks man!   
   
I didn't know that story particularly well, I was never a history guy.   
But thanks for filling in the blanks. Appreciated.
Ah, thanks man!

I didn't know that story particularly well, I was never a history guy.
But thanks for filling in the blanks. Appreciated.
User avatar #119 to #116 - thatarmybrat (06/28/2012) [-]
Also David Tennant reaction images. Thumb for you, sir.
User avatar #105 to #98 - Enternal (06/28/2012) [-]
How would the U.S. cut off Japan's oil supply?
#113 to #105 - Lawlor ONLINE (06/28/2012) [-]
Well, they were the country supplying them with it at the time.   
   
I don't know the story very well, but Japan were in a war with China, I believe, and this used up a lot of their resources.   
They relied on the US for some raw materials but mainly oil, and the US didn't approve of the war they were in with China, so they stopped supplying them with anything.   
   
I honestly only know the bare bones of this story, and even then, not that well.   
But I am 100% certain of one fact, and that's the oil bit!
Well, they were the country supplying them with it at the time.

I don't know the story very well, but Japan were in a war with China, I believe, and this used up a lot of their resources.
They relied on the US for some raw materials but mainly oil, and the US didn't approve of the war they were in with China, so they stopped supplying them with anything.

I honestly only know the bare bones of this story, and even then, not that well.
But I am 100% certain of one fact, and that's the oil bit!
#126 to #113 - thatarmybrat (06/28/2012) [-]
Which is lulzy and ironic if one considers that nowadays the only place that SEEMS to have oil is the Middle East...  Even though the oil shale in Canada alone could supply all of North America literally til' Kingdom come.  Chuckle chuckle to Japan...  A modern version of this scenario would have been "We don't have any (legally) sellable oil, but if we did!  YOU CAN'T HAVE ANY."  America's face when.
Which is lulzy and ironic if one considers that nowadays the only place that SEEMS to have oil is the Middle East... Even though the oil shale in Canada alone could supply all of North America literally til' Kingdom come. Chuckle chuckle to Japan... A modern version of this scenario would have been "We don't have any (legally) sellable oil, but if we did! YOU CAN'T HAVE ANY." America's face when.
#118 to #113 - Enternal (06/28/2012) [-]
Oh okay, thank you for your time.
User avatar #106 to #105 - Enternal (06/28/2012) [-]
just wondering
0
#93 to #82 - Lawlor has deleted their comment [-]
#84 to #82 - latinotornado (06/28/2012) [-]
thanks for the support bro.finally someone here has opened a history book
thanks for the support bro.finally someone here has opened a history book
-2
#78 to #69 - merdas has deleted their comment [-]
-3
#76 to #69 - merdas has deleted their comment [-]
#85 to #76 - anonymous (06/28/2012) [-]
America bombed nagasaki because Japan assumed America only had one Nuke so they did not surrender and they continued to fight until after the US bombed them.
#83 to #76 - anonymous (06/28/2012) [-]
you're ******* ridiculously stupid. the japs were ready to "fight to the death", every citizen on the homeland, as they tragically did in many of the pacific islands...after the first bomb was dropped on hiroshima, they were given 3 days to sy=urrender, but did not, so nagasaki was bombed. a total of around 250000 people died as a result of this. a land invasion woyuld have resulted in millions.
#75 to #69 - anonymous (06/28/2012) [-]
u mad bro?

You can;t even take a ******* joke. It's called ****************** , not prove-me-wrong-junk.
User avatar #77 to #75 - latinotornado (06/28/2012) [-]
9/11 isent funny anon.not to me.
 Friends (0)