I haven't seen a trace of left wing communism in American discourse today, maybe Bernie Sanders but people like him are a rarity.

Figured I should mention that Walker lowered the unemployment rate by 1% and created over 10,000 jobs in Wisconsin during his year in office. He also erased a significant amount of the 3.6 billion dollar budget deficit left over from the state's previous governor, Jim Doyle, a Democrat. Statistically speaking, Walker is clearly the best man for the job. I don't really care what his budget plan looks like, it's tremendously effective.

YES, god forbid it! The prison system has no business being for profit. It is obviously inhumane in nature! When people can make money in the business of holding people in prison that gives them an incentive to create more crime and lengthen prison sentences. How in the fuck is that bullshit by any means of the word? Do you have a soul? Are you really Karl Rove posing as anon? Whats with the crippled morality you're displaying? And as far as purchasing our democracy I would think it a fairly obvious observation. But if you need specifics, the Koch Brothers spent $3,528,750 lobbying (Legalized Bribery) in 2006, and the Scott Walker recall election was a clear case of the powerful and wealthy overtaking elections, with huge sums of outside money going into pro walker campaign contributions and ads for the sake of keeping that collective bargaining stripping bastard in power. Walker raised 30.5 million dollars to his opponents 3.9 million. Im sorry dude maybe im the asshole here but I don't believe that this amount of money should be allowed to overwhelm a fucking process like democracy. Its EXACTLY how they get people to vote against their own interests. And you have to get over this whole 'hating the rich' fallacy you have stuck inside your thought process. You know in your heart it isn't some class envy, the fact that you ignore it is a poor reflection upon you and your misguided attempts at understanding politics. GIF unrelated

Okay, from what you have said I can already tell your moral standards are broken or at least rightfully uncommon. And your fundamental lack of understanding in the profit motive really undercuts your argument. When I have an incentive to create more crime because it suits me well financially I want there to be a broadened crime standard so that more people are sent to my money making operation. Ill want more drug laws in place so that more people are incarcerated, so I will purchase ads for my bought politicians who will pose as 'tough on crime'. I hope you are connecting the damn dots. Yes it should cost millions or billions of dollars, because it is the fucking governments job to incapacitate threats to our society. That is why the police aren't private either, because if I can make money off of arresting people I am going to be unreasonably harsh with my arrest record. Its similar to the broken way that prosecutors work, where they have an incentive to get convictions rather than reach a true verdict. And to not care when the prison sentences are lengthened because 'they deserve it' is not only unsympathetic but also mental laziness. If I was sentenced for an unreasonable amount of time for a victimless crime or a crime under similar circumstances that show that I am not a threat to society, I will want to commit more crimes because fuck it, they already took fifteen years of life away from me and I won't be able to cope with the world now. Most of the people who are in prison are in there for selling drugs ie they don't deserve it. That and to counteract the mentality of recidivism it is a good idea to intelligently reduce prison sentences and punishments in general. Im just trying to wrap my head around when you said "if they are going to incarcerate someone, they might as well make a little profit of it in the meantime". That is an irresponsibly insane thing to say, and I think you need to spend a little more time thinking about things before typing them.

Saying that government spending on prison and crime is them losing money is just like saying that investing the money needed to fund an army is losing money. They are both primal functions of the government. It is the government that organizes the judges, juries, executioners, and police. You still want the government to pay these private prisons to hold onto our criminals. And drug crime ARE victimless crimes, what I do with my own body is no business of the government. You don't fucking know better than me what I want/need, so leave my liberties alone. If my addiction has gotten so bad that I am breaking into cars for drug money, then arrest me for breaking into the damn cars. The only thing drug laws do is make it so that good people are put in prison for an unreasonable amount of time, which is what they want. And if you truly believe that drug dealing is a serious offense, then go arrest the head of Budweiser and Marlboro because they have been objectively responsible for more deaths than any street dealer ever has. If you can't see the problem there, there is no helping you, for you have sworn some misguided allegiance to the worst people among us in the private industry. And you did not truly respond to the second paragraph you quoted from me, only to insult my manner of making the argument.

"Tell me, what is wrong with making profits in the process?"
If it prolongs the process and especially if it is one that involves potential human suffering, it IS wrong.

The last refuge of a man with no argument or any honest way to stand in a discussion, you display it in spades. Not everything is about money and standing to make a profit, the government shouldn't be most of all. Again there is a reason why the Army and police are not privatized. Tell me, when was the last time you heard of some guy coming home and getting high on marijuana right before beating the shit out of his wife? I don't need to bring up the drunk driving statistics but can you show me any substantive statistics involving a record of marijuana caused deaths? And not everybody suffers an addiction from these drugs, some of us have discipline. There are alcoholics, should we ban alcohol like we did a hundred years ago? I think we ought to be free to get addicted to things just like the free market assholes want us to be free to fail as well as succeed, if you cause a crime because it has made you dangerous THAT is when I say step in. People fucking DIE addicted to cigarettes, and they don't even get you high. The only reason those drugs are legal is because the government can't make money off of them and they can exist in American society with us still being productive little slaves for our corporate masters.

"The difference is, they're LEGAL. AND less harmless."
Well if their less harmless than whats the problem with legalizing the other More Harmless drugs? Idiot.

You sir are a cunt, you are a disingenuous drone who poses as an anon so that you don't have to wear your silly ideas on your person. I would expect nothing less from a coward such as yourself than to run from a person who can stand on their two feet. Good day to you, I hope someday you abandon your echo chamber in hopes of enlightenment away from your programmed ideology.

Well with your track record im not sure its worth believing you Mr.Isucksatanscock, at the very least my errors don't completely contradict my statement. My damn point was that cigarettes are legal, and none of these other things are. I see you avoided my governmental arguments. Its my right to do what I want with myself and I have the right to deal with the consequences. Marijuana makes you mellow, while alcohol has the capacity to remove the fear from individuals, making some of them act on violent tendencies. But they are free to drink. Not even to mention all the prescription drug addicts that exist under their demons. I love how you like to give the graces of banning drugs to protect us, but meanwhile are ignorant to the plight of those who suffer at the hands of the drug war because these drugs are illegal. You are incapable of being changed, unlike me who is not grounded so fervently into their ideology.