| All | Popular >
|
funny
|
fucking-science
|
fucking-tumblr
|
facebookposts
|
animemanga
|
pokemon
|
lol-channel
|
fucking-cats
|
videogames
|
morbid-channel
|
doctor-who
|
what
|
oc-comic-makers
|
bendingtime
|
4chan
|
ponytime
|
katawashoujo
|
feels
|
gameofthrones
|
polandball
|
pickogram
|
myownchannel
|
adventure-time
|
superheros
|
l4d
|
spongebob
|
goodnews
|
warhammer40k
|
toonhole
|
batman
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply +23
#33 - garentei (05/31/2012) [-]
PETA spent 9,000 dollars on a giant freezer to kill animals, at the end PETA killed about 70% more animals than they saved (correct me if wrong, writing this down from memory)

PETA IS BULLSHIT!
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply 0
#164 to #33 - iamthatoneguy (06/01/2012) [-]
**iamthatoneguy rolls 81,898**
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply +1
User avatar #55 to #33 - wiljones (06/01/2012) [-]
why did they kill them that doesnt really make sense
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply +2
User avatar #57 to #55 - garentei (06/01/2012) [-]
voices.yahoo.com/peta-animal-activists-hypocritical-killers-2953776.html
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply +3
User avatar #53 to #33 - garentei (06/01/2012) [-]
I'm sorry, googled it and it was actually 95 PERCENT OF ANIMALS KILLED NOT 70%

PETA IS EVEN MORE BULLSHIT
source? voices.yahoo.com/peta-animal-activists-hypocritical-killers-2953776.html
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply 0
User avatar #92 to #53 - mrevitcartta (06/01/2012) [-]
Yeah I don't think PETA supports even one non-kill shelter.
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply +8
#45 to #33 - steelturnabout (06/01/2012) [-]
Hey Vegeta, what's this user say about PETA's spendings level?
Hide Hide All +Fav (1) Reply +31
#69 to #45 - officialmindwarp (06/01/2012) [-]
**officialmindwarp rolls 44**
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply +2
#102 to #69 - lolmiester (06/01/2012) [-]
heres a gif them dubs
heres a gif them dubs
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply 0
#183 to #102 - karloemb (06/01/2012) [-]
i want a video source of that, please.
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply +2
User avatar #70 to #69 - officialmindwarp (06/01/2012) [-]
Oh hey, we got us some dubs over here.
Show Hide All +Fav (0) Reply -11
#62 to #45 - N. Korean citizen (06/01/2012) [-]
It's OVER GET A LIIIIFE!
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply +1
User avatar #71 to #62 - officialmindwarp (06/01/2012) [-]
Coming from an anonfag on FJ.. I'm sure you don't have a great definition of what "life" is.
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply +5
#38 to #33 - JasonGar (05/31/2012) [-]
this year peta killed 97% of the animals they took in
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply +1
#39 to #38 - JasonGar (05/31/2012) [-]
last year i mean
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply +1
#58 to #39 - coyoteseeker (06/01/2012) [-]
It's because they can't find them homes right? They get all these animals and it turns out nobody wants them so they just off them because it costs too much money to take care of them. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply 0
User avatar #75 to #58 - thatsmevictory (06/01/2012) [-]
You are wrong.There are plenty of homes just itching to take in an animal. But PETA is convinced that an animal is better off dead then alive, where there could be the possibility that it might be abused. There IS no pet overpopulation problem, just idiots who think no one is too good to giva an animal a home.
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply 0
User avatar #136 to #75 - officialmindwarp (06/01/2012) [-]
I actually have to agree with this guy. Every one of my family members has at least 5 animals, and we love to take in more. Personally my parents and I combined have 12 going on 13 soon.

The excuse of them not having homes is bullshit to me. If you are a PETA activist, prove it. I can maintain 12 animals in my household, you can maintain two or three. :/
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply +1
#59 to #58 - JasonGar (06/01/2012) [-]
spot on my good sir
Back to the content 'Peta'
<
>
 Friends (0)