the point of these photos, from someone who actually read this guys blog, is to not show that the food looks nothing like their advertisements but to ask is it legal to even show these images and not get anything close to the pictures, is it false advertisement is what the man is trying to get at, personally i do agree that if you go to a restaurant and you order food it should at least closely resemble what is being advertised.

Food from fast food rarely looks as bad as it does in the post, the guy who made the post has stepped down to the advertisers level and has exaggerated by showing the most bad looking products, the whole "rotated to most attractive angle" thing is a load of shit. he used the worst food he could find, probly tampered wih it to make it look uglier then took photos of the worst sides, and if he had use decent food this post would be meaningless. he also stoops down to the same level as the advertises by leaving out the food that was actually decent looking, where are those pictures? he's as bad as the advertisers themselves.