| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
Shitstorm ahead
| |
Links are not allowed.
You are allowed to post every 1 minute on the same page.
You are allowed to post every 1 minute on the same page.
Remaining character count: 1000
Why do people care? I mean I personally think gay sex is gross. But it I could care less if other people like to do it. Gay marriage being illegal is stupid
I agree with him... nothing wrong with being different, but there's a point where you should kindly shut the fuck up about it... a friend told me he was gay three years ago, and that's all he's ever talking about... the fact he's gay... I listen to anybody that wants to talk, even if I don't care that much about the subject or can't relate to anything they're saying, but change the frigging page once in a while! Maybe I wanna talk about something else than how much someone liked your skills at sucking cock! Maybe I want to talk about the movie we just saw, instead of listening who you'd bang if you could! Maybe I can cook something and not get a compliment like "You cook like a gay guy :D"! Maybe, oh, god, maybe... you wouldn't turn any and every subject towards your favourite subject!
Same thing with internet fags. I'm one... first time I discovered /b/ and FunnyJunk, all I could talk about was memes and what I read in a thread or some shit like that... can't believe my friends stood up with me as much as they did until someone said "You know, the only things you talk about is internet related" and I went "Fuck... he's right... maybe I should read a book instead of threads, watch movies instead of browsing funny pictures... what am I doing with my life...?"
this comment derailed beyond salvation...
How was your day?
Same thing with internet fags. I'm one... first time I discovered /b/ and FunnyJunk, all I could talk about was memes and what I read in a thread or some shit like that... can't believe my friends stood up with me as much as they did until someone said "You know, the only things you talk about is internet related" and I went "Fuck... he's right... maybe I should read a book instead of threads, watch movies instead of browsing funny pictures... what am I doing with my life...?"
this comment derailed beyond salvation...
How was your day?
what? No.... I can't imagine anyone being okay with them going up to your face when you're walking down the street doing a gay dance with a shirt that says, "I'm gay, deal with it" blocking your path and dancing to make you stop to sign some sort of petition.
True story, happened when trying to get to class.
True story, happened when trying to get to class.
i have no idea why youre getting thumbed down except for perhaps the fact that you said shove it down your throat while referring to a gay man. But other than that i think youre completely right. those gays that want to make sure everyone know s that they are gay are incredibly annoying
Ah, thanks. I asked because I could have sworn I once saw the exact same thing being posted there. Also, you just described the way I became a brony. Quite frankly, I don't give a rats' ass about the show. I only watched it so I can get all the jokes.
#136 to #131
-
trollchildxy (05/24/2012) [-]
Oh no no no, the show is pretty funny I can't lie. Its just not something I would go out of my way to watch every week. I just happen to catch a few episodes since a bronie I hang out with on occasion makes me watch them when I'm visiting his place.
#149 to #143
-
trollchildxy (05/24/2012) [-]
Oh, I understand what you mean now. (Kinda confused about your - thumbs. Maybe people are interpreting what your saying to my comment as negative. I dunno... Can't be helped i suppose. I once posted "Agreed, and saved!" about a picture and got like -20 for it LOL
#187 to #166
-
trollchildxy (05/24/2012) [-]
Now you really should be kinder sir, I mean it is probably a misunderstanding of his comment. (Or Trolls maybe.)
Or it could be they think he is trying to say all bronies are homosexuals, or all homosexuals are bronies. Hmm....
Or it could be they think he is trying to say all bronies are homosexuals, or all homosexuals are bronies. Hmm....
#192 to #187
-
SemiAnon (05/24/2012) [-]
You were talking about being enjoying being around gay people.
He asked if you'd ever been to the brony board.
I'm 100% certain they took that to mean "the brony board is filled with gay people. Not a straight guy around for miles." Which isn't what he meant, since he was just curious if he had seen you before.
He asked if you'd ever been to the brony board.
I'm 100% certain they took that to mean "the brony board is filled with gay people. Not a straight guy around for miles." Which isn't what he meant, since he was just curious if he had seen you before.
#580
-
poontanglife (05/24/2012) [+]
(4 replies)
Being openly gay as a young teenager takes more balls than any god damn bully has.
You go gay kid.
You go gay kid.
No offense, but when you are a teenager, i don't think you can confidently say that you are 100% gay.
At our age people may feel that they are mature enough to know, but they are not, they do not have the relationship experience to know, they may curious, there may be that 1% that does know, but for the most part, I think that they see a guy get a random hard-on and start thinking more, and suddenly they think they're gay, when they are just curious and have hormonal surges.
All the power to you, but I would wait until I was older and had more experience to say definitely.
*braces for shitstorm/ red thumbs*
At our age people may feel that they are mature enough to know, but they are not, they do not have the relationship experience to know, they may curious, there may be that 1% that does know, but for the most part, I think that they see a guy get a random hard-on and start thinking more, and suddenly they think they're gay, when they are just curious and have hormonal surges.
All the power to you, but I would wait until I was older and had more experience to say definitely.
*braces for shitstorm/ red thumbs*
#746 to #734
-
heyyeyaaeyaaaeyaey (05/24/2012) [-]
Because its an affront to The Lord, spreads AIDS, and is just overall disgusting. You weren't given a dick so you put it in another guy.
And when people say they were born that way, ya, so are pedophiles! It would be a logical fallacy to claim one is and the other one inst. Normalization of faggots. Paving the way for the next abomination, legalized pedophilia. Is that what you want?
And when people say they were born that way, ya, so are pedophiles! It would be a logical fallacy to claim one is and the other one inst. Normalization of faggots. Paving the way for the next abomination, legalized pedophilia. Is that what you want?
1) We don't live in a theocracy, so you can't base a law on religion
2) Aids is spread through all sexual contact, not just gay.
3) Disgusting is an opinion, some people think certain foods are disgusting
4) You can't say why we were given a dick to do anything
5) People are born that way, so why should we criticize them for it?
6) Unfortunately, I think there is nothing wrong with certain forms of pedophilia. I think if it consensual between both parties, it should be legal. Unfortunately, so many pedophiles would rape the child then force them to say it was consensual for fear of their own safety, and they would get off scott free. SO it's a precautionary law for safety, so there really is no other choice. Meeting adjourned.
2) Aids is spread through all sexual contact, not just gay.
3) Disgusting is an opinion, some people think certain foods are disgusting
4) You can't say why we were given a dick to do anything
5) People are born that way, so why should we criticize them for it?
6) Unfortunately, I think there is nothing wrong with certain forms of pedophilia. I think if it consensual between both parties, it should be legal. Unfortunately, so many pedophiles would rape the child then force them to say it was consensual for fear of their own safety, and they would get off scott free. SO it's a precautionary law for safety, so there really is no other choice. Meeting adjourned.
The issue comes from what is consensual. Consensual usually means that both parties know exactly what they are getting into when they agree to an action, in the case of Minors their decision making is impaired by the fact that they do not have enough life experience to truly understand what they are agreeing to.
Now I do understand that "18" is an arbitrary age and some people mature to a point of being consensual before that and some later than that, but when you are talking legality you need a base point and our society has deemed it to be "18" (depending on your state or country of residence).
Now I do understand that "18" is an arbitrary age and some people mature to a point of being consensual before that and some later than that, but when you are talking legality you need a base point and our society has deemed it to be "18" (depending on your state or country of residence).
I completely agree with you. If they could evaluate each case personally, that would be what I think is good. Unfortunately, this can't really happen. I just think that in certain cases it should be okay, but they need the rule to be safe rather than sorry.
Yeah, I get that. I'm just saying, sometimes someone who is 15 or 16 will be able to understand. Other times they can't. It's not like when you turn 18 you magically attain judgement, that just seems to be about an average age.
Some people agree, that's why it has more than 50 thumbs. You disagree, you get tins of thumbs down. At this point, you're not going to give any more "logical," if you could call it that, arguments, so I'm done, and I think I won. And hey, if I'm wrong, I'm sure there'll be a kick ass party in hell, with Freddy Mercury as the entertainment and Niel Patrick Harris helping me get some poon.
Not exactly what I said. I personally am not attracted to children. I think it kinda weird to be honest. But love is love, no matter age, gender, or whatever. The only reason it is considered wrong is because of how often it is forced on the child. But if the child is old enough to understand and make their own decision, like 15 or 16, then there is really nothing wrong with it.
#1148 to #854
-
N. Korean citizen (05/25/2012) [-]
My opinion is that it goes as far as how sexually active the person is. A four, five, six year old, up to like, 9 or 10, is NOT sexually active or even aware half the time of what sex is.
But twelve year old girls these days... not saying I'm interested, but that they do try to push themselves into more "mature" relationships with older men. I wouldn't call a twelve year old and say, a 20 year old pedophilia if both parties fought for marriage/ and both expressed complete understanding of the commitment they were undertaking.
Some 12 year olds are remarkably mature, others are simply just sexually active by their own choice and so it's bound to happen, just like pregnancy among twelve year old parents. A fourty year old marrying one, however, is just creepy.
But twelve year old girls these days... not saying I'm interested, but that they do try to push themselves into more "mature" relationships with older men. I wouldn't call a twelve year old and say, a 20 year old pedophilia if both parties fought for marriage/ and both expressed complete understanding of the commitment they were undertaking.
Some 12 year olds are remarkably mature, others are simply just sexually active by their own choice and so it's bound to happen, just like pregnancy among twelve year old parents. A fourty year old marrying one, however, is just creepy.
#878 to #746
-
Badger (05/24/2012) [-]
So here's a hypothetical.
We can already implant electronic devices in the brains of paraplegics so that they can control robotic limbs remotely, so I don't think a full-fledged processor/memory is far off. Now, if an infant is almost instantly imbued with the total knowledge of humanity, then it is mentally mature, and should readily become psychologically mature (within a year or two). Now, this roughly 3 year-old is completely an adult in their minds, yet are not physically. I think that with these modifications to the contemporary human growth model, a 'child' should be fully able to decide for itself whether or not it wants to have sex with a physically mature individual.
TL;DR Babies get knowledge implants, grow a bit, give consent at 3 y/o, seems alright
We can already implant electronic devices in the brains of paraplegics so that they can control robotic limbs remotely, so I don't think a full-fledged processor/memory is far off. Now, if an infant is almost instantly imbued with the total knowledge of humanity, then it is mentally mature, and should readily become psychologically mature (within a year or two). Now, this roughly 3 year-old is completely an adult in their minds, yet are not physically. I think that with these modifications to the contemporary human growth model, a 'child' should be fully able to decide for itself whether or not it wants to have sex with a physically mature individual.
TL;DR Babies get knowledge implants, grow a bit, give consent at 3 y/o, seems alright
#32
-
N. Korean citizen (05/24/2012) [-]
'Amazing dads'? I think FABULOUS would've been more appropriate.
#212
-
Bad Man (05/24/2012) [+]
(2 replies)
**Bad Man rolled a random image posted in comment #4919139 at FJ Pony Thread ** MFW gays.
#323
-
stlbecker (05/24/2012) [+]
(22 replies)
why do people think Christians hate gays? I guess westboro church and godhatesfags.com doesnt help, but honestly i am a christian and gay people are awesome and should be respected and treated like anyone else
Oh and God doesn't hate gays either
Oh and God doesn't hate gays either
#412 to #384
-
stlbecker (05/24/2012) [-]
wow, christians are stupid eh?
Louis Pasteur, Gregor Mendel, Wernher von Braun, Galileo Galilei, Joseph Lister, Johannes Kepler, Michael Faraday, Robert Boyle, Carolus Linnaeus and C.S Lewis beg to differ.
and not to bash atheists because i also respect them, but you guys also believe stuff people tell you. unless you personally did all the research to formulate the big bang and evolution...
Louis Pasteur, Gregor Mendel, Wernher von Braun, Galileo Galilei, Joseph Lister, Johannes Kepler, Michael Faraday, Robert Boyle, Carolus Linnaeus and C.S Lewis beg to differ.
and not to bash atheists because i also respect them, but you guys also believe stuff people tell you. unless you personally did all the research to formulate the big bang and evolution...
#481 to #446
-
stlbecker (05/24/2012) [-]
we wave it around like it is correct because we think it is correct... and I wouldn't go as far as to say that there is absolutely no proof of His existence. Creation itself is pretty awesome. I mean DNA and RNA and all aspects of the human body are so complex and perfectly formulated it just all works perfectly.
The big bang is kind of like expecting a tornado to rummage through a dumpster and expecting it to create a Boeing 747 if you ask me.
The big bang is kind of like expecting a tornado to rummage through a dumpster and expecting it to create a Boeing 747 if you ask me.
#1152 to #446
-
N. Korean citizen (05/25/2012) [-]
Psst. You're not getting thumbed down because you're an atheist in a community of christians. You're getting thumbed down because you're acting like the very annoying, psychotic religious people you despise (not saying all religious people are, just the ones Athiesm lives to argue with), only with atheism. And you're giving us a bad name in doing so.
Please shut the fuck up or get another belief system.
Please shut the fuck up or get another belief system.
#396 to #323
-
casadue (05/24/2012) [-]
you see, i would start a smart conversation about christianity and about the message that Jesus told us, but it would take too much time and energies from me...
anyway i think that wbc have nothing to do with christianity (it's a fact that someone called Jesus of Nazareth lived about 2000 years ago, if you believe he was the Son of God it's ok, if you don't it's ok too): everyone is a sinner in his/her own way, but if you're a christian you should love him before condamn him for his sins.
It's like J. C. was a brony: he told to love and tolerate...
anyway i think that wbc have nothing to do with christianity (it's a fact that someone called Jesus of Nazareth lived about 2000 years ago, if you believe he was the Son of God it's ok, if you don't it's ok too): everyone is a sinner in his/her own way, but if you're a christian you should love him before condamn him for his sins.
It's like J. C. was a brony: he told to love and tolerate...
#428 to #396
-
stlbecker (05/24/2012) [-]
yeah i agree. i never understood why people think Christianity is such a hateful religion. Christians have such horrible representation because only the retarded "Christians" get publicity i.e Westboro Baptist Church.
Jesus was all about love and peace and honoring fellow man and he called Christians to be as loving as possible to everyone including gays/atheist. Anyone who spreads hate through Christianity is not a Christian
Jesus was all about love and peace and honoring fellow man and he called Christians to be as loving as possible to everyone including gays/atheist. Anyone who spreads hate through Christianity is not a Christian
#1155 to #428
-
N. Korean citizen (05/25/2012) [-]
You've got that representation because, at one time, Christianity WAS a hateful religion that killed a lot of innocent people in the name of Witchcraft, among other offenses, until society got sick of you and made you all villains because of past mistakes. Now, I agree you're a bit more tolerant, but there's still hundreds of "Christians" who fling hate speech around like a monkey with access to fecal matter.
That's why retarded Atheists never get publicity (like real Christians), but show the media an Atheist in trouble and it's suddenly martyr (or anti-martyr?) time.
That's why retarded Atheists never get publicity (like real Christians), but show the media an Atheist in trouble and it's suddenly martyr (or anti-martyr?) time.
#1061 to #323
-
rottengrits **User deleted account** (05/25/2012) [-]
Leviticus 20:13
"If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them."
This is why, it's right there in the Bible. Apparently God does hate gays.
"If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them."
This is why, it's right there in the Bible. Apparently God does hate gays.
#1120 to #1061
-
N. Korean citizen (05/25/2012) [-]
Jesus never said anything about homosexuality. Long story short: Leviticus is in the first part of the bible, and Jesus in the second.
And that particular expert you're quoting there is actually part of a moral code set down BY MAN for a certain region.
And that particular expert you're quoting there is actually part of a moral code set down BY MAN for a certain region.
#1124 to #1120
-
rottengrits **User deleted account** (05/25/2012) [-]
Classic religious cherry picking. "Oh you're supposed to follow the second half, not the first half! Except for those things in the first we still like of course!" It's either all of it or none of it, pick one.
#1156 to #1124
-
N. Korean citizen (05/25/2012) [-]
The coming of Jesus in the bible created a new era of change in the way the old religion was run. That's why it's called the "Old" Testament, and the New Testament is basically a modification to the old.I could get a quote, but I haven't touched a bible in years.
So let me get you an example. Before Jesus, people were being sent to hell left and right, no warning. After Jesus, those people had a chance, as Jesus taught them the way to his father. In Christianity this way is supposed to be followed in order to enter heaven, whereas the old ways were considered sinful. That being said, the HISTORICAL parts of the Old Testament, and the HISTORICAL references it makes, are still to be kept as part of the entire book.
So let me get you an example. Before Jesus, people were being sent to hell left and right, no warning. After Jesus, those people had a chance, as Jesus taught them the way to his father. In Christianity this way is supposed to be followed in order to enter heaven, whereas the old ways were considered sinful. That being said, the HISTORICAL parts of the Old Testament, and the HISTORICAL references it makes, are still to be kept as part of the entire book.
#1158 to #1061
-
stlbecker (05/25/2012) [-]
well God doesnt hate gays he hates homosexuality
he doesnt hate murderers, he hates murdering
see what I am gettin at? Every sin according to God is equally as disgusting and worthy of death. "For the wages of sin are death" It is hard to comprehend such cruel judgement on such petty sins but any ounce of evil in God's book is worthy death. He loves all people infinitely just not what they do sometimes
he doesnt hate murderers, he hates murdering
see what I am gettin at? Every sin according to God is equally as disgusting and worthy of death. "For the wages of sin are death" It is hard to comprehend such cruel judgement on such petty sins but any ounce of evil in God's book is worthy death. He loves all people infinitely just not what they do sometimes
#1161 to #1158
-
rottengrits **User deleted account** (05/25/2012) [-]
Homosexuality isn't a choice so he apparently hates them for something they don't have control over? You seriously should look up battered person syndrome or Stockholm syndrome because that's exactly what you sound like. Sins are equal to death? Yeah okay that's a sign of a god that " loves all people infinitely" If he was real he could just get rid of evil all together.
#1162 to #1161
-
stlbecker (05/25/2012) [-]
that is debatable that homosexuality is a choice. They may be born with a disposition to homosexual tendencies but they still can fight it. Just like those born fat, they can still escape that through exercise and will power.
God is also a God of wrath not just a God of love... also he actually doesnt love those who die as an atheist, he says that is the only unforgivable sin. and He could get rid of evil, and he will. Just hasn't happened yet.
TL;DR this will make no sense to you, it barely does to me, Gods ways are outside human understanding
God is also a God of wrath not just a God of love... also he actually doesnt love those who die as an atheist, he says that is the only unforgivable sin. and He could get rid of evil, and he will. Just hasn't happened yet.
TL;DR this will make no sense to you, it barely does to me, Gods ways are outside human understanding
#691 to #642
-
beastinben (05/24/2012) [-]
**beastinben rolled a random image posted in comment #257 at Annular Eclipse **
#50
-
N. Korean citizen (05/24/2012) [+]
(1 reply)
"My dad can beat up your dad."
"Oh yeah? Well my dad will shag your dad! And your dad will enjoy it."
"..."
"Oh yeah? Well my dad will shag your dad! And your dad will enjoy it."
"..."
#140
-
thechosentroll (05/24/2012) [+]
(9 replies)
I still don't get what the big deal with gay people is. Why does everyone care? They're just normal people who have a slightly different taste in partners. I know a guy who has sexual fantasies about cars. Homosexuality seems pretty normal in comparison.
We don't like it because most of the religious debates revolve around homosexuality being a clear affront to their deity. Homosexuality has been around for centuries, it is only recently that people have been largely involved about their freedom, though this comic explains it better than whatever I can say.
leasticoulddo.com/comic/20120519
leasticoulddo.com/comic/20120519
#768
-
simoon **User deleted account** (05/24/2012) [+]
(1 reply)
**simoon rolled a random image posted in comment #113 at Scumbag Toph **