Batman>Ironman. Don't even ask me why, he just is.

Bruce would win Tony in a fist brawl. :)

Take away Ironman's suit you just got a genius, billionaire, playboy, philanthropist. Take away Batman's suit you got a billionaire, playboy, philanthropist, who will kick you ass..........

I misread that last part and read "Snort coke off a hookers asses." and thought "Where the fuck do you get your prostitutes, Chernobyl?"

In the movies.
In the new 52 arc, Bruce spent multiple days being mentally tortured and not eating or drinking and still defeated the guy attacking him and got away.

Regardless, we're talking about completely different levels, here. You could feasibly shoot Batman dead with a pistol. Shooting Iron Man requires anti-tank weapons with armor-piercing rounds.

Batman has EMP nades, disable the suit, no Iron man. He has plans for every hero should they go rogue, he has kryptonite and and he could simply disable the suit.

If it were that easy, Hydra or AIM would have killed Iron Man long ago. The Iron Man armors likely have shielded circuitry.

Most likely, that's speculation, as is everything to do with super hero fights. I'm just saying that Batman has a lot of tech that he can fish up to counter him.

Batmans suit is bulletproof. Think of it more like this.

Power wise, Iron Man would beat Batman because he has fucking lasers and an automatic toilet in his suit.

Courage wise, Batman wins. Because, look at the bastard, on top of having an image to maintain as Bruce Wayne, he has to fight crime all night, always do vigorous training and he fights for Gotham no matter what. He fights to the end for Gotham in a suit that is hardly as effective as Iron Mans. Batman has shit to do to keep fighting. Iron Man can just put on the suit and be ready. Batman is very determined.

In the end, Batman will, to me, be the better hero.

Batman uses bullet-resistant materials in his costume, but they are not fool-proof and don't cover 100% of his body. A high-powered rifle would go right through his armor.
Anyway, the OP was about who would win in a fight, not who is the better hero. Batman is, in many ways, the epitome of what it means to be a superhero. But, Tony Stark had the courage to see the error of his ways and the mistakes of his company, and decided to change them, and I don't think that can be discounted.

**newupload rolls 07**

He sure did, but the fight thing actually could go either way. Batman has some shit on that belt that could come in handy. Smoke bombs, his grapple thing, his gliding shit, etc. Batman COULD beat Iron Man if he snuck up on him like someone said somewhere else. Then Iron Man would be outright fucked. Plus, Bruce Wayne can't go making crazy decisions that seem strange or people will suspect him of being Batman. Tony announced it, Bruce hides it to protect people he knows.

Plus, Batman could still win regardless. His martial arts skills, ability to hide and his overall intelligence could win him a fight. I don't know, it's kind of an impossible thing to tell.

What exactly would Batman do even if he did sneak up on Iron Man? His punches can't actually hurt Iron Man, he can't choke Iron Man out, etc. Batman could use explosive Batarangs, but I doubt those are more effective than a blast from Loki.

How should we know? He's batman, he was trained as a fucking NINJA. He can probably find a vulnerable part of the suit, break that shit or just go for the heart thing.

He is faster and more agile than Iron Man because his suit was designed to be like that. Iron Mans is mostly just force.

If one doesn't know how a superhero x would hurt another superhero y, then one either doesn't know enough about the given superheroes, or superhero x simply cannot harm superhero y. I think this is a case of the latter.

I haven't the slightest fucking idea what you just said.

Look at it this way:
Batman could beat Superman with kryptonite. Therefore, Batman could beat Superman.
Wolverine's claws can pierce the Iron Man armor. Therefore, Wolverine could beat Iron Man.
Superman is strong enough that his punches could hurt Iron Man. Therefore, Superman could beat Iron-Man.
Batman could beat Iron Man with...??? Therefore, Batman could not beat Iron Man.

The big glowing thing is a pretty obvious weakpoint, I imagine a batarang or something hitting that would fuck it up somewhat. Plus, he has what is practically a fucking tank. And I imagine, with smoke bombs, a grappling hook and explosive gel, he would have some sort of EMP bomb.

1. The "big glowing thing" isn't a weakpoint. It's part of the armor, and just as fortified as the rest.
2. A tank that Iron Man is perfectly safe from while in the air.
3. If Iron Man were not shielded against EMPs, then Hydra, AIM, or other tech-based organization or supervillain would have easily killed him by now.

Okay, dude, this is an impossible argument. Both have strength and weaknesses. We are talking about an agile, martial art genius incredibly adept at hiding with weird gadgets and shit against a brute force guy in a suit of impenetrable armour. Iron man can take several bullets from any gun, batman can't. Iron man can't hide, Batman can.

Both have the ability to beat the other depending on the circumstances. As another guy said, without their suits, Batman wins. With them, Iron man probably wins. It's impossible to tell because the shit Batman has on that belt of his is mostly a mystery. And if he IS beaten, he can go to Lucius Fox and get something to beat Iron Man. Iron Man has to make his shit, Batman already has his.

Well, first of all, two billionaires having a fist fight would be stupid and boring. Obviously, if you're talking "who would win" you give them access to all their toys. Second, what exactly would Lucius give him that wouldn't either be A, totally stupid ("well, Bruce, I don't know what you need it for, but I've got this here gizmo that will short out any device with the words 'Iron,' 'Man,' 'Mark,' or a Roman numeral in its name"), or B, way too dangerous and lethal for Batman to consider using?

Wow, why are all your comments thumbed down while the other guy's are thumbed up?
Iron Man would destroy Batman.
You won this argument hard.

How the fuck should we know, Lucius Fox probably has explosive dildos or dick eating blow up dolls.

Intense logical debate going on here

It actually looks like it got one-sided really quick.

Oh, i only read the three replies, i look back at it now and im like, oh LOL

I'm not entirely sure about this but I think Batman's suit can take a few shots.
But of course, after a few shots from Iron Man he would probably be defeated.
I think the hardest part would be actually hitting him.

Batman has bullet-resistant mesh and other materials in his costume in more recent iterations like the Arkham games and the movies, yes, but it's not 100% coverage.

Yeah.
I could see a fight between them go either way.