Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#36 - mattdoggy (05/11/2012) [-]
If a girl doesn't want a baby it's pro choice
if a guy doesn't want a baby he's a deadbeat loser

I believe if you want to get an abortion that has no medical reason (like the baby is going to kill you or something) then you should have to birth the child then murder it with your own hands. Essentially you are committing murder, so that is an effective response. If you can't raise the kid then set it up for adoption. Being an orphan is better than being dead.

and OP, keep the political crap off Funnyjunk. I came here for lulz, no Sh*tstorms.

User avatar #44 to #36 - thetattooedone (05/11/2012) [-]
I believe that it is my body and no one should be allowed to tell me what to do with it. Plain and simple. Don't like abortion, don't have one.
User avatar #52 to #44 - therealpokemon (05/11/2012) [-]
Ok, let me give you a scenario. As a man, I have no idea how to go about this situation, since I have no uterus:
You and a man fall in love. You have sex. You get pregnant. You want to lose it, he wants to keep it. You consider it a hindrance, he consider it his child. You break up over the difference in opinion. He wants it, you don't. So, would you still get the abortion, even though the father wants to keep it?
This is for my own reference.
User avatar #646 to #52 - thetattooedone (05/12/2012) [-]
I don't know. I just don't know. I have written 4 different answers now and deleted them. To simply answer your question without ANY explanation, if we broke up, no, I would not keep the baby if I didn't feel it was the right time in my life to be having babies.
User avatar #647 to #646 - therealpokemon (05/12/2012) [-]
That's all I need to hear. So, I take it that it's your belief that the father gets no say in the matter, even if it's his child too and you wouldn't have to take care of it at all?
User avatar #649 to #647 - thetattooedone (05/12/2012) [-]
It was extremely hard for me to answer that. If I got pregnant tomorrow, and my husband though we should keep it and I saw it as a hindrance, I would keep it. I think we would be OK raising a child in our current state but if we had any less than we do now, it would be very hard to convince me to try and raise a child when we couldn't take care of ourselves.
User avatar #650 to #649 - therealpokemon (05/12/2012) [-]
Ok then let me rephrase it, since I've already made you answer a tough question once:
If a woman doesn't want the baby, but the father wants it and would do all the work himself, should the woman be allowed to abort it?
User avatar #651 to #650 - thetattooedone (05/12/2012) [-]
The father should have rights but then couldn't a woman, if she really didn't want it, just say "It isn't yours" and the whole conversation would be done with? There really isn't anyway to prove, quickly, otherwise.
User avatar #652 to #651 - therealpokemon (05/12/2012) [-]
Well yes but now you're just salvaging the argument with an irrelevant possibility of what could happen if the woman in question was a total bitch.
#47 to #44 - John Cena (05/11/2012) [-]
Don't like rape, then don't rape.
Don't like Murder, then don't murder.
Don't like genocide, then don't commit genocide.
That concept is silly.
The problem with abortions is that its effectively become contraception, if you suddenly decide 20 weeks into the pregnancy you don't want a baby, you just kill it; no responsibility, no ethics, it's a burden to you so just remove it.
User avatar #648 to #47 - thetattooedone (05/12/2012) [-]
That is not the first time I have heard that argument on here. Those things are illegal, abortion, is not. It is legal for a reason. Could you imagine all the unwanted babies if it weren't illegal? People would find more babies in the gutter because 13yr olds aren't ready to raise them.
User avatar #308 to #47 - starvaggi (05/11/2012) [-]
That's different. You cannot rape, murder, or commit genocide against your own body. In the eyes of the law, while the baby is within the mother, it is a part of her body.
#43 to #36 - soldiernerd (05/11/2012) [-]
but if your dead you will never have the misfortune of being an orphan

mattdoggy - 0
soldiernerd - 1
#38 to #36 - epiccactus (05/11/2012) [-]
or save all that hassle get an abortion and donate the foetus to stem cell research, research that has potential to save many more lives
#37 to #36 - gtaant has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #54 to #37 - therealpokemon (05/11/2012) [-]
You're a dumbass. A sperm and an egg by themselves have no potential to amount to anything. Now, a child on the other hand has a **** TON of potential.
#57 to #54 - gtaant has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #60 to #57 - therealpokemon (05/11/2012) [-]
Wrong, it's one cell, called a zygote, and I believe life begins at conception, as that is the point when the fetus starts developing, and its potential manifests itself.
#42 to #37 - tanfapstick (05/11/2012) [-]
its not fertilized fagot
 Friends (0)