| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
#1691 - N. Korean citizen (05/06/2012) [-]
im chirstian ,and in our church we dont hate gay couples ,its wrong, yes but we arent going to kill ppl because they are gay. we dont steal money we ask for money to make temples not for other dumb reasons. we dont force ppl to do anything we tell them our belive and if you belive its then thx the lord. watever religios that do that arent correct and will be punished.
#1703 to #1691 - girtfible (05/06/2012) [-]
"its wrong, yes"

Please explain how being homosexual is wrong. I'm begging you for a good reason. Please, on behalf of your entire religion, educate me.
#1743 to #1703 - N. Korean citizen (05/06/2012) [-]
Because it stops a specie from reproducing.
User avatar #1790 to #1743 - jakehatt (05/06/2012) [-]
nuns vow not to have sex, your arguement is invalid
#1762 to #1743 - girtfible (05/06/2012) [-]
Because we totally need people like you reproducing.
Because we totally need people like you reproducing.


#1734 to #1703 - fraggle (05/06/2012) [-]
From a purely scientific standpoint, being gay is wrong because that means a portion of the species is not reproducing and continuing the species.
From a purely scientific standpoint, being gay is wrong because that means a portion of the species is not reproducing and continuing the species.
#1783 to #1734 - Ajracer ONLINE (05/06/2012) [-]
....Because overpopulation is totally not a problem in many parts of the world.
#1742 to #1734 - girtfible (05/06/2012) [-]
Coming from a scientific standpoint, the world is already viciously overpopulated, and perhaps a portion of us not reproducing is a good thing.

Next stupid argument?
#1768 to #1742 - N. Korean citizen (05/06/2012) [-]
That is not coming from a scientific standpoint, it comes from you own personal viewpoint because you want to find an excuse for homosexuality stopping a specie from reproducing.
There is no benefit for a specie from homosexuality, there is no point for them. They only take resources and give nothing back. I am not talking about humans, but species in general, there is no use for a homosexual deer in nature.

#1788 to #1768 - girtfible (05/06/2012) [-]
How is that a personal viewpoint? I'm 100% positive homosexuals cannot reproduce without legitimately TRYING to reproduce.

At the current population, even suggesting that we are having a problem reproducing and that homosexuality is killing us is ridiculous. You are just being bull-headed.
#1821 to #1788 - N. Korean citizen (05/06/2012) [-]
Where in my comment did i suggest that we are having a problem reproducing and that homosexuality is killing us. I said that there is no point for homosexuals because they take up resources and give nothing back, read my comment again.
Everyone who disagrees with you or thinks differently is not bull-headed, people like you who are so self richous and ignorant that they arent even able to read other peoples comments and pay attention are bull-headed.
Read my comment again and maybe you will get the point.
#1835 to #1821 - girtfible (05/06/2012) [-]
Stating that homosexuality slims population in an anti-homosexual argument infers that you have worries about the human population.

I believe my comment is pretty spot-on, given the amount of ignorance you have shown.
#1893 to #1835 - N. Korean citizen (05/06/2012) [-]
No, not the human population, population in general. Like I said, I am not talking about humans only, population in general.
Forget the way you feel about gays, become neutral. Now think about homosexuality in nature, animals. What use does a homosexual deer have? It consumes resources but does not reproduce. It is harmful to the species as it consumes the resourced that could have gone to a deer that reproduces. The homosexual deer mother wasted precious time and resourced on it hoping that it will help the species to survive, but no, it just harms the specie.
I am not one to decide if it is wrong or right, nature decides it, and as it shows it has no use for homosexuality.
Now tell me, how is homosexual a normal thing?
#1759 to #1742 - fraggle (05/06/2012) [-]
How's it stupid? That's what populations do. They burgeon. Things are great for a time. Then they collapse. Populations shrink. Things start over.

Next stupid refutation?
#1769 to #1759 - girtfible (05/06/2012) [-]
Read my actual comment, comprehend, and think about how you aren't making any valid reason why it ISNT stupid.
#1798 to #1769 - fraggle (05/06/2012) [-]
It's how everything works. It's an inevitable cycle. And anyways, how many gay animals do you ever see?
It's how everything works. It's an inevitable cycle. And anyways, how many gay animals do you ever see?
#1817 to #1798 - girtfible (05/06/2012) [-]
Funny you should ask.

You should probably look into it, because there are thousands of species that show capability and willingness of being homosexual, including dogs, cats, and dolphins.
 Friends (0)