| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
#505 - fagbagzag (05/03/2012) [-]
Not trying to sound like a Christian asshole, but when i was younger(In high school) I was having problems with my actually believing God and the purpose of the religion.

Someone told me just the opposite of this, they said

Instead of risking going to hell or whatever why not have faith in some religion(not just Christianity), because in the end if there turns out to be a God of your faith you'd go to heaven, but if you don't have faith in anything and there's a God then you're screwed, so why not take the risk of having faith instead of none at all, because in the end if there is no God or afterlife nothing happens.
User avatar #589 to #505 - hebs (05/03/2012) [-]
Its called pascal's wager and it fails on every single level. just because you believe in one god wont save you from the hell of another god. if this is your one and only life then every minute and every cent you spend on religion is a waste. plus if god was all knowing he would know your just trying to cover your ass so you would go to hell anyway.
#615 to #589 - fagbagzag (05/03/2012) [-]
That's not the point at all. What I'm getting at there is that it's better to have faith in something because you'd have a better chance of getting into heaven than having no chance at all. Also I didn't state that you should pretend to have a religion, that you should actually have full faith in one.
User avatar #648 to #615 - hebs (05/03/2012) [-]
i am saying if that is your only reason in believing its a bad one. plus faith is believing in something with out prof. witch is the dumbest thing i ever herd. i care if my beliefs are true and will not believe in anything because of fear. plus if in that 1 in a 100000000000000 chance there is a god then would he send we to hell for not believing even if i have been a good person all my life. because if he would i wouldn't want to go heaven anyways. not to mention that there is evidence everywhere saying the idea of god is just made up bullshit
#659 to #648 - fagbagzag (05/03/2012) [-]
Why am I arguing with you? I get what you're saying but it's just foolish what you're saying.
User avatar #670 to #659 - hebs (05/03/2012) [-]
how is it foolish.
#685 to #670 - fagbagzag (05/03/2012) [-]
1. You sound extremely butthurt
2. You sound like you're upset
3. Half of what you said is barely applicable tot he argument
#576 to #505 - katsovon (05/03/2012) [-]
Because what you're saying is that you can choose what you believe. If someone has decided that they do not believe in God then they cannot change that. They would simply be living a faux life of religion in order to hedge their bets that they will get into heaven if there is a God. Surely an omniscient being would know that there was no true devotion and that the following was against your beliefs and purely for personal gain which i can't imagine a God allowing a person into heaven for.

tl;dr can't choose to believe something that you don't because the outcome is better if it's true
User avatar #710 to #576 - hebs (05/03/2012) [-]
i never said that you can choose i said that pascal's wager states that you can just play it safe by saying you believe. i think it is retarded
#605 to #576 - fagbagzag (05/03/2012) [-]
I guess I didn't state it in the origional post that I am a Christian and that is what I fully believe in, but you get what I'm trying to say there? That it's better to have faith in something than nothing.
#636 to #605 - katsovon (05/03/2012) [-]
Sorry if i wasn't 100% clear, i understand that this is what you believe in, and I was simply putting an answer to your question about as you put it 'being better to have faith than not' from my point of view (without attempting to tell you that you are wrong for having faith, simply the reasons why I, and others do not). I understand your point but from mine, if deep down i don't believe, however much i'd like to hope there is a heaven, i can't have faith and i can't change what i don't believe in because i'd like it to be true
#654 to #636 - fagbagzag (05/03/2012) [-]
That's understandable. I don't see an issue there, all I see is that you have a valid reason not to believe in something. You put your faith into that. I respect you because you see it as impossible to happen. probably in the same way I don't believe in the big bang. It's all the same really, we just have different opinions.
User avatar #550 to #505 - biggrand (05/03/2012) [-]
if there was a god to begin with, do you think the point of Christianity was to believe in it, or to be a good person? if so, and god did exist, it shouldn't matter what you believed in if you are truly a good person
User avatar #546 to #505 - funnyfox (05/03/2012) [-]
That's called Pascals Wager and is not exactly the best reason to believe. There are millions of gods in thousands of religions and a single person bets on their particular god in a sea of "possible" gods. The odds are against you a billion to one. Same with everyone else.

Here is a very good video on the subject: http://www . youtube . com / watch?v=fZpJ7yUPwdU

It's quite interesting. And if you want your beliefs to support reality, then this is perfect.
#556 to #546 - fagbagzag (05/03/2012) [-]
All I'm saying is a billion to 1 is better than not having any chance at all. I just left a statement you can take it as you please. But it is nice to know someone else knows this.
User avatar #573 to #556 - funnyfox (05/03/2012) [-]
Don't you think that the almighty, all knowing god would know that you're just betting rather than being sincere? Wouldn't you rather use the short life you have searching for the real truth, rather than settling on a somewhat comforting illusion?

If you believe you are right, then you won't continue searching. And that is the saddest thing of all.
#585 to #573 - fagbagzag (05/03/2012) [-]
I have my faith and I stick to it. I know I was raised with that faith but if I already have faith why stop having faith now?
User avatar #623 to #585 - funnyfox (05/03/2012) [-]
Because faith, by nature, is believing something without evidence. That is foolish at best, dangerous at worst. If you just "take things on faith", then you are leaving yourself open to believe anything at all as long as it fits your preconceived narrative.

An open mind is good only when it is skeptical as well.
#634 to #623 - fagbagzag (05/03/2012) [-]
I see where you're going here and no. I don't just believe some fact that's thron out I look into it before I give any belief to it. I am close minded in my religion because that is my faith, but it doesn't mean I'm not open minded to literally everything else.
User avatar #644 to #634 - funnyfox (05/03/2012) [-]
So any information that would show your faith is flawed would be thrown out?

Is there anything in this universe that would make you put your faith away? Is there any evidence that would convince you that you were/are wrong?
User avatar #539 to #505 - eldeeko (05/03/2012) [-]
Because i'd like to live my life, dictated by me, not someone else who may or may not be real.
#549 to #539 - fagbagzag (05/03/2012) [-]
Coming in here condescending acting like I'm preaching to you... I was stating something that I apply to MY life. I did not say YOU had to believe any of it. I already said I wasn't trying to be a Christian asshole.
User avatar #557 to #549 - eldeeko (05/03/2012) [-]
I quote you "so why not take the risk of having faith" To me this is an open question, and i answered it.

Do we have a problem here?
#560 to #557 - fagbagzag (05/03/2012) [-]
I see your point but it came across very condescendingly. I don't want an issue but from that comment it looked like you were calling me out. My apologies for assuming.
User avatar #570 to #560 - eldeeko (05/03/2012) [-]
If i was calling you out bro, you'd know about it.
User avatar #531 to #505 - nichsell (05/03/2012) [-]
The way I see it is, live your life the best you can. If there is no god than at least you lived your life good. If there is a God that will judge you based on faith, and not the actions of your life, than that is a unjust God and doesn't deserved to be praised. But if there is a God that will just judge your actions, and not your faith than that is a just God, and deserves to be praised.
#567 to #531 - fagbagzag (05/03/2012) [-]
I see your logic here, but the point of a religion is to have faith, and what you're talking about is a whole different philosophy.
User avatar #600 to #567 - nichsell (05/03/2012) [-]
I see what you mean about faith, but what I trying to say is in my opinion I would rather believe in a deity that would accept everyone than just a exclusive bunch of people. I've read some of your comments and it just (seems to me) that you are believing in something out of fear of going to hell.
Of course this is my opinion, so please don't take offense.
Also if you want to believe in a religion to find the 'right' one, why not look up religions older than Christianity. There are loads of them out there that have either died off or still living.
#626 to #600 - fagbagzag (05/03/2012) [-]
I totally agree with you. In the original post I didn't completely get my full argument out there and it didn't represent me that well. What I meant is that you should have full faith in something that you want to believe, not just to take the fear out of going to hell, but to find something you can relate to and understand. You have valid points on places in my argument that I didn't specify, and I thank you for being polite about it.
User avatar #656 to #626 - nichsell (05/03/2012) [-]
No problem bro. Even though I'm a agnostic-atheist I respect all people that has some kind of faith as long as it isn't out of fear.
#666 to #656 - fagbagzag (05/03/2012) [-]
I wish more people were like you. You seem to be pretty intelligent, enough so to actually debate with someone instead of just flaming the shit out of them.
User avatar #681 to #666 - nichsell (05/03/2012) [-]
lol I've had my fair share of debates in my life, when I debate someone I want to know every angle of what that person believes in, before throwing a counter argument. I just make sure that both our views are opinionated and if we have any facts than you got to be able to back them up.
#691 to #681 - fagbagzag (05/03/2012) [-]
Totally agree. Laughed when I saw your comment was 666 on Atheism.
User avatar #697 to #691 - nichsell (05/03/2012) [-]
Lol that is funny.
User avatar #522 to #505 - kevinweeks (05/03/2012) [-]
But what if you're worshipping the wrong god? What if Zeus is the real almighty being, or Krishna, or Cthulu, or Xenu, or any of the thousands of other deities, or million possibilities for a deity is the actual true god?
#529 to #522 - fagbagzag (05/03/2012) [-]
Better to risk one than to not believe in any at all.
#562 to #529 - N. Korean citizen (05/03/2012) [-]
Because belief is merit alone to guarantee entrance into the afterlife. Pretty shitty reasoning to me. If you don't limit yourself to one and just live a good life then who you believed in would be irrelevant. Best to just dump all down the drain. They aren't necessary to life.
 Friends (0)