Logic. None here.

his idea is the best but his actions are kind of soft
butt well its a kids show

He's not evil to be evil.
He does what makes him laugh.
Unfortunately for everybody else, what makes him laugh makes them suffer.

True. I just find him hilarious. And his evil laughter is truly the best I have heard in a while.

Da fuc? I pressed reply button on the comment below my and suddenly I get my own comment -.- Discord has done it again!

here ya go

I already have it, but thanks anyway.

Also, that brasilian fart porn is weird.

sorry but I just couldn't resist after reading the I iwll destroy you!

>mfw someone uses an image that I edited

reminds me of the joker he just dont give a fuck

That's why the joker is awesome.

Yeah, he sort of just does whatever he wants to do to entertain himself, never really doing anything dubbed "villainous" like world domination or assaulting important figures.

So would he be Chaotic Neutral, Chaotic Evil or Chaotic Chaotic?

Chaotic Chaotic I would think. Assuming I remember the proper definitions for those alignments.

I wonder what would happen if Discord, Pinkie Pie and Sheogorath threw a party together.

Ever heard of the big bang?

Lets hope Sheogorath can put his world back together after that.

Who says it has to be destroyed? He is the god of madness he ain't gotta explain shit lol

I wonder if he'll have a molten cheese fountain.

I'm fairly certain "chaotic chaotic" isn't an alignment for D&D.

Wait, what?
That stuff comes from Dungeons and Dragons?

Near as I can tell, I'm pretty sure the alignment system started with D&D.

I have no idea if other systems of play use it or not.

I was told that it isn't an official alignment, but some DMs will allow it.

I'm not sure what it would entail. All I can think it would be is the equivalent of Chaotic Neutral.

Someone who isn't good or evil. Just chaotic.

Maybe I am thinking of chaotic neutral. They just do whatever the hell they want whether it benefits the party or not? I haven't played much and it's been about 6-7 months since I last played.

Pretty much. Here's the D&D SRD entry for it.

"A chaotic neutral character follows his whims. He is an individualist first and last. He values his own liberty but doesn’t strive to protect others’ freedom. He avoids authority, resents restrictions, and challenges traditions. A chaotic neutral character does not intentionally disrupt organizations as part of a campaign of anarchy. To do so, he would have to be motivated either by good (and a desire to liberate others) or evil (and a desire to make those different from himself suffer)"

That's what I was thinking of. That entry is a bit confusing since it says "He values his own liberty but doesn’t strive to protect others’ freedom." but then goes on to say "(and a desire to liberate others) ". I don't understand whether he does or doesn't liberate others.

Nevermind. I misunderstood this part "He values his own liberty but doesn’t strive to protect others’ freedom."

My knowledge about D&D isn't too great.

No Tom is

nuff said

again, old cliche

Wabbajack Wabbajack Wabbajack!

Except that he wouldn't kill people. There is nothing more boring than a corpse.