| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
#430 - mahooganboi (04/25/2012) [-]
you chose the most simple pokemon from the generations you support then chose the most complex legendaries from the generations you dont like...   
 FJ LOGIC
you chose the most simple pokemon from the generations you support then chose the most complex legendaries from the generations you dont like...
FJ LOGIC
#465 to #430 - DEW72 (04/25/2012) [-]
Try to find more than like 4-5 pokemon in the first 150 that you cant immediately relate to a real thing though?
#496 to #465 - mahooganboi (04/25/2012) [-]
mewtwo, snorlax, ditto, jigglypuff, digglett, abra, muk, drowzee, hitmonlee, lickitounge, koffing, chansey, and i didnt include evolutions for many of thoes. but i do somewhat agree but to be honest thats the last thing im worried about when i play pokemon. i play it for fun and a little competition with my friends. and there is such a thing as an open mind.
User avatar #483 to #465 - samsquanch (04/25/2012) [-]
electrode, grimer, mewtwo, porygon, weezling, lickitoung,jigglypuff. any of evolution related to those. plus others
User avatar #463 to #430 - RykenX (04/25/2012) [-]
Agree, how the fuck was he gonna explain mew, or snorlax for Gen 1.
or Sentret and Shuckle for Gen 2.
#453 to #430 - robertdylan (04/25/2012) [-]
must.have.chair!
 Friends (0)