Chuck and Diver. Deeds to Crackheadmike for posting the original newspaper article.. unloaded IN: crackheadmike previous DEAR? EL: Dun '-airity. ,' i and Eh! wi Chuck Norris diver Shark man
x
Click to expand

Chuck and Diver

(Enlarge)
Chuck and Diver. Deeds to Crackheadmike for posting the original newspaper article.. unloaded IN: crackheadmike previous DEAR? EL: Dun '-airity. ,' i and Eh! wi

Deeds to Crackheadmike for posting the original newspaper article.

unloaded IN: crackheadmike
previous
DEAR? EL: Dun '-airity. ,' i and Eh! wilt AII' Cait. , which in : I and mini.
A Worthy heir at last
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+11
Views: 1039
Favorited: 0
Submitted: 04/23/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to munchlord submit to reddit
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #1 - norwegianwaffles (04/23/2012) [-]
chuck norris is a giant faggot
>inb4 thumbs up when you all actually know it's true
User avatar #3 to #1 - munchlord (04/23/2012) [-]
Wether he is in fact a giant faggot, as you postulate, or not is irrelevant to the joke. We both know how he is regarded in the meme-verse, and that is what the joke refers to, regardless of its relevance to the facts of the matter, not to mention your oppinion which, quite frankly, will remain rather irrelevant untill backed up by something more solid than simple oppinion.
User avatar #4 to #3 - norwegianwaffles (04/23/2012) [-]
he supported SOPA and PIPA...
User avatar #5 to #4 - munchlord (04/23/2012) [-]
If that is indeed the case, then that would be said more solid thing to remove your oppinion from the domain of irrelevancy.
#7 to #5 - norwegianwaffles (04/23/2012) [-]
this should be you profile picture
User avatar #8 to #7 - munchlord (04/23/2012) [-]
Quite skillfully played good sir.
User avatar #14 - mads (04/23/2012) [-]
Tony Jaa bitch.
#6 - bringmethetea (04/23/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

User avatar #9 to #6 - munchlord (04/23/2012) [-]
My memory does indeed contain recollections of learning of that, but since Mr. Norris is more frequently seen in the role of an extraordinarily masculine male as far as memes are concerned than Mr. Lee. Thus, I regarded Mr. Norris as the more preferable choice in this matter.
#10 to #9 - bringmethetea (04/23/2012) [-]
But thus saying that Lee is a better choice in people you don't wanna 			****		 with.
But thus saying that Lee is a better choice in people you don't wanna **** with.
#11 to #10 - munchlord (04/23/2012) [-]
Indeed, but as the crimson-colored encirclement at the top of the imagery file indicates, the matter at hand was regarding percieved masculinity rather than factual competence in the field of forcibly inducing physical contact between a person's buttocks and the pavement.
#12 to #11 - bringmethetea (04/23/2012) [-]
Ah, i see well jolly good then with identifying masculinity, now i would not want to hinder you but what do you think is the perfect example of masculinity; beard, muscles, short hair?
Feel free not to answer this question as we are all assiduous, and would not want to bother.
#13 to #12 - munchlord (04/23/2012) [-]
I am of the conviction that while certain physical characteristics of appearance, as well as articles of wear, are capable of accentuating masculinity, or even capable of inducing an incorrect appearance of masculinity to a certain limitation, the true source of masculinity is in fact to be found within the processes unfolding in the cerebral matter of a person. Courage, honor and confidence are all considerable indicators of such. This, naturally, have a measure of impact upon the visual representation of a person in the form of posture and composure, but it is considerably more prevailant for show in actions and communication.

Similarly, the measure of a Gentleman is taken not in the color of his top hat, nor in the length of his monocle chain or the size of his pocket watch, but in the integrity of his conduct.
#15 to #13 - bringmethetea (04/24/2012) [-]
Sorry for my slowpokeness, and agreed i do think it confides in the person rather than what the garments a person wears or hair.. etc, but rather on the gentlemen inside to show dominance and intimidation.
Sorry for my slowpokeness, and agreed i do think it confides in the person rather than what the garments a person wears or hair.. etc, but rather on the gentlemen inside to show dominance and intimidation.
#2 - turretbuddy (04/23/2012) [-]
Wat.
 Friends (0)