747. lol. IF A 747 CAN CARRY THE SPACE SHUTTLE THEN I CALL an " ON ALL we was. overweight fees don't really have to do with the planes weight, rather the fact that any particular person working there has to lift the bag over their head and
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

747

lol

Tags: nope
IF A 747 CAN CARRY THE SPACE SHUTTLE
THEN I CALL an " ON ALL we was
...
+693
Views: 11698
Favorited: 29
Submitted: 04/21/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to uncontrollablelol E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
-48
#1 - magicmace has deleted their comment [+] (8 replies)
User avatar #2 to #1 - heartlessrobot ONLINE (04/22/2012) [-]
I think you accidentally your grammar.
#11 - anonymous (04/22/2012) [-]
**anonymous rolled a random image posted in comment #117 at I miss my cat **

you have to pay extra for heavy luggage because the heavier the plane is the more fuel it consumes. so you pay for fuel.
#10 - rollinquads (04/22/2012) [-]
overweight fees don't really have to do with the planes weight, rather the fact that any particular person working there has to lift the bag over their head and into the plane, 60 times a flight, the idea being that if everyone has 100 pound bags the worker could get injured
#4 - faithtwister (04/22/2012) [-]
The spaceshuttle is contributing aerodynamicly and thereby resulting in more lift - your fat ass and your bag is not
User avatar #9 - xinsai (04/22/2012) [-]
Does anybody else think they need to put a smaller plane on top of the shuttle, and then a car on top of the plane and then a bike on top of the car?
User avatar #6 - Fifee Boy (04/22/2012) [-]
except that 747 has no passengers or luggage, only fuel
#19 - lemonhed (04/22/2012) [-]
the 747 was originally built to carry the space shuttle because it would be much faster to fly the ****** than to slowly drive it on the few roads strong enough to not break open under the weight.
#16 - quotetype (04/22/2012) [-]
they cancelled the shuttle program. NASA i am dissapoint
0
#15 - arhinoinyourcar **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#18 - dasbaum (04/22/2012) [-]
The more weight the more Kerosine ist wasted the more cost the flight... duuuhhh
#5 - anonymous (04/22/2012) [-]
That 747 basically only has a cockpit, fuel tanks, etc. Everything that is essential for a commercial flight that isn't needed is removed.
 Friends (0)