So true.... .
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

So true...

+4402
Views: 65867
Favorited: 262
Submitted: 04/21/2012
Add to favorites Subscribe to vampyric Edit Image E-mail to friend
Share on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend
Show:   Top Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
Show All Replies
#35 - fukluvmakesammichs (04/21/2012) [+] (34 replies)
1) the nature of art is suppose to ether express emotion or create thought. just because you dont understand it doesnt mean that its shit, not saying i understand it.. i would like to have a look at the artists notes before i would make a comment. yes this is low skill art, and i dont like it but the premise still stands.
2) thats graffiti, yes theres skill in it, yes it looks cool. but what does it represent?? what does it make you feel?? not saying that no graffiti is art, just not literal tags. as long as the artists doesnt have a right to paint there it will be vandalism. doesnt matter if its banksy, space invader, monet. doesnt matter who.


#44 - trinitex (04/21/2012) [+] (16 replies)
and they think this shit is "abstract"


pretentious cunts
#53 to #51 - trinitex (04/21/2012) [-]
i just did

what now mother fucker
#229 - trollmetoday (04/21/2012) [+] (3 replies)
That's because the second one defaces public property. Grow up, and realize that.
#213 - ragingbrony (04/21/2012) [-]
This image has expired
But neither of them have Happy Trees!
#286 - moneybag (04/21/2012) [+] (1 reply)
#234 - professionalbadass (04/21/2012) [+] (20 replies)
The first one is crappy art, and the second one IS vandalism. Ladies and gentlemen, THIS is art.
#141 - fannybanny (04/21/2012) [+] (9 replies)
**fannybanny rolled a random image posted in comment #134 at Zeddie Little delivers **

What I call art
User avatar #355 - fxremastered (04/22/2012) [-]
They call it vandalism because they put their art somewhere where it shouldn't be. It is still art, they were just put it on the wrong place.
#158 - yoper (04/21/2012) [-]
Modern art.
#40 - arziben (04/21/2012) [-]
both are shit

< THIS is art
#13 - carebearlove (04/21/2012) [-]
Because one of them wasn't put on someone elses property.
#199 - spidahridah (04/21/2012) [-]
It's all about people's personal tastes. Besides, if you spray shit on other people's property, whether its the world's most beautiful piece of art or not, its still vandalism. Derp.
#309 - ronnywillkillyou (04/21/2012) [+] (2 replies)
You call THAT art? THIS is art.
#212 - N. Korean citizen (04/21/2012) [-]
Because it is vandalism, you stupid 12 year olds
#389 - culcro (04/22/2012) [-]
But it is vandalism...
#79 - wovow (04/21/2012) [-]
Well ya, bottom picture is vandalism. If the top picture was painted/drawn/sprayed on a wall/building that doesn't belong to artist, then that is also vandalism.
Well ya, bottom picture is vandalism. If the top picture was painted/drawn/sprayed on a wall/building that doesn't belong to artist, then that is also vandalism.
#329 - rockstarwolf (04/22/2012) [+] (6 replies)
Awesome art thread?

Fuck, this shit should be in a museum!
User avatar #291 - icantusecaps **User deleted account** (04/21/2012) [+] (1 reply)
DUR HUR ABSTRACT ART REQUIRS SO MUCH TALNT HURP
I HAZ ART DEGREE TO PROV IT
#272 - rhox (04/21/2012) [+] (4 replies)
Mfw... Wait. Wrong art.
#243 - N. Korean citizen (04/21/2012) [-]
**anonymous rolled a random image posted in comment #207 at Classy ** THIS is art
 Friends (0)