nope.

It's healthier. Being cut reduces chance of penile cancers. Plus it's cleaner. Less bladder infections when you're cut. Reduces risk of catching HIV. But even all those things are ifish. No side, pro or anti circumcision, has any definitive proof on much at all. It's mostly a cultural thing, and the possible benefits really do outweigh the risks.
If I told you there was an out-patient procedure with a less than 0.5% health risk, that might offer all the advantages I just listed, would you take it?
And to be honest, as a guy who IS cut (and has been since infancy), the loss of sensitivity can't be all that bad, seeing as I can get off perfectly fine. If anything, years of free-balling in blue jeans has done more damage than circumcision ever did.