Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#290 - deltadeltadelta
Reply +208
(04/17/2012) [-]
I can't tolerate feminists. They're fine with the father staying at home and raising the children, but if it's the mother, she's ostracized for not being independent.

I feel bad for the Scandinavians that have to tolerate ridiculous feminist laws. Such as Sweden's sexual misconduct laws (which punish men for things like a condom break during consensual sex), and Iceland's gender quotas, where every business and service (private and public) must have a certain percentage of women. I imagine this is problematic for fields such as construction and policing.

Recently feminists attacked wikipedia because most contributors/editors are men. The internet is dominated by men because men aren't as social as women. Men in general are more introverted than women.

Feminists would have us stick women on the front lines, despite this already being tried by Israel and failing miserably. It failed because the men would go out of their way to protect the women, jeopardizing their objective. A woman's scream was also severely demoralizing for the men. This is why women are only allowed in supporting roles.

Feminists think they can override human biology with social engineering.
#1009 to #290 - kneesocks
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
Theres 8 countries who stick their women out on the front lines, and they're doing great.
Not all women are pussies, deltadeltadelta and scream like little girls.
#1041 to #1009 - deltadeltadelta
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
No, there are not. There are countries that allow women in the army in supportive roles, but not in direct combat.
#1062 to #1041 - kneesocks
Reply 0
(04/18/2012) [-]
Yes, there are.
#1064 to #1062 - deltadeltadelta
Reply 0
(04/18/2012) [-]
Where are these mythical countries?
#1065 to #1064 - kneesocks
Reply 0
(04/18/2012) [-]
Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Italy, Germany
#1066 to #1065 - deltadeltadelta
Reply 0
(04/18/2012) [-]
None of these countries permit women in the front lines. Only men are allowed in direct combat operations.

FYI, I'm Canadian.

If you want to continue this conversation, you could source me where you got your information.
#1067 to #1066 - kneesocks
Reply 0
(04/18/2012) [-]
Are you an idiot? I'm a Canadian too.
Women ARE permitted in the front lines, they all have the exact same jobs.
My source of information is my dad who's an Officer in the Canadian Forces.
#1068 to #1067 - deltadeltadelta
Reply 0
(04/18/2012) [-]
What do you not understand that women in the army are not permitted in direct combat roles?

If your dad told you that, then he's a liar.
#1069 to #1068 - kneesocks
Reply 0
(04/18/2012) [-]
I know what I'm talking and you don't. Women have the same roles as males in the CF.
You obviously have no idea what you're talking about so I bid you adieu, I don't have time for you.
#1070 to #1069 - deltadeltadelta
Reply 0
(04/18/2012) [-]
No, you don't know what you're talking about, nor did you even ask your father (who likely isn't in the Canadian Army). Your feminist nonsense is clouding the reality of things.

Women aren't permitted to serve in direct combat roles because of the effect they have on men. Every army segregates their soldiers by gender as well. The military isn't subject to the peoples' whims when its counterproductive to military doctrine. The military is realistic, not idealistic.
#1071 to #1070 - kneesocks
Reply 0
(04/18/2012) [-]
Yes, Yes I do know what I'm talking about.
I'm a cadet, and my dad IS in the Canadian Forces and is an Officer.
You know NOTHING.
You are an imbecile.
#1072 to #1071 - deltadeltadelta
Reply 0
(04/18/2012) [-]
Which branch, which rank?

No, you haven't a clue what you're talking about. Everything you're saying is nonsense and disconnected from reality.
#777 to #290 - givehimthemulk
Reply +1
(04/17/2012) [-]
Really Sweden? You've changed....
#770 to #290 - bloodyspy
Reply +1
(04/17/2012) [-]
That was an awesome post, and you are awesome

...but...
*ahem*
Iceland isn't a scandinavian country.

That's all.
#958 to #770 - geraldbostock
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
Culturally it is though.
#960 to #958 - bloodyspy
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
Still only nordic. Scandinavia consists only of Norway, Denmark and Sweden.
#966 to #960 - geraldbostock
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
Yeah, I know. You're right, of course, but I mean that since it was part of Denmark until relatively recently it shares quite a bit with them, so it's not that unreasonable to include it when talking about Scandinavia.
#969 to #966 - bloodyspy
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
Mmmh, theoretically. I usually prefer to stick to clean, pure facts. It is the closest non-scandinavian country to scandinavia for many reasons of course. Still should not be put under "scandinavia".

Let's not argue about this, though. We're on the same side really.
#971 to #969 - geraldbostock
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
Yeah, it was a kind of pointless argument. Just out of interest, are you a reader of SATW comics?
#1045 to #971 - bloodyspy
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
Indeed I am!
(Sorry for saying this after 3 hours, I was doing something else.)
#577 to #290 - anon
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
It's okay when a woman can actually DO the work

i've met women on the internet who are perfectly fine people, I hate when FJ says that "all women do this" and say it seriously. No. That's like saying all christians are nutjobs, and not as a joke.

I also know a woman who is more of a beast than a woman, who is in one of my school's mechanics classes and is definitely going to make a great mechanic one day. And women who can man the **** up in battle, whether on the front lines or at home.

The thing is, not ALL women are meant to be construction workers, mechanics, cops, soldiers, or other places in which men tend to prevail.

So while equality for all means women should be allowed in those fields and a business should not refuse to hire because it's a female applying, it does NOT mean that feminists should go around and throw women who are clearly not suitable for a job into that job.

/rant
#466 to #290 - finni
Reply +19
(04/17/2012) [-]
You forgot to mention that Sweden also has a new term. "Hen". It's supposed to make it all gender neutral. There aren't going to be any more boy names or girl names. A boy can be named Hanna and a girl can be named Sven. They also try to gender neutralize toys so that there are no girl toys or boy toys, which fails of course because you can't control a child's mind.
Boys will turn anything into a gun, and girls will turn things into softer toys and not be as wild as boys are.

I'm half Swedish and I say, just as this Finnish guy says : SWEDEN SUCKS!
#867 to #466 - swedz
Reply -5
(04/17/2012) [-]
**** off you fag
#876 to #867 - finni
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
You might tell me to **** off. You may call me anything you like, but that won't change anything. Sweden is a **** hole no matter how much you don't like it.

I am just telling what's happening, if you tell me to **** off because of that is like getting angry at the messenger for telling you that your army has been crushed. No matter how much you don't like what I have to say, this is true and you should rather think about changing that and think about what kind of reputation your country is getting.
#931 to #876 - swedz
Reply -2
(04/17/2012) [-]
Faggot gotta be racist. You dont know **** and can´t make judgements :) Queer
#1034 to #931 - finni
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
I know ****, I can tell you. I don't know why you're attacking me. It's not like I want these things to happen, but ignoring them won't make them go away.

And if I'm a racist then you're homophobic with your comment.

Sweden is getting a really bad reputation throughout Europe. It is first place in Europe with the country with most rapes, second place in the world, Jews are driven out of cities like Malmö because of extreme leftist and Extreme-Muslims, trying to neutralize genders and force women to work when they want to stay home with their children, people who criticize Sweden's policy is shouted down by the Media, disturbed while trying to demonstrate against racism towards swedes or even killed.

And you have this **** going on: www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=rCK6zvWEN_Q

Don't kill the messenger. All I'm doing is telling the truth. But of course if you want your country to be a ******, anti-democratic, extreme femenistic country then fine, but don't expect me to like it.
#1037 to #1034 - swedz
Reply -1
(04/17/2012) [-]
See, now you´re upset as well. damn faggot stop be so butthurt and dont make judgement about a country you´re not from.
#1038 to #1037 - finni
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
I'm half Swedish, I would have loved being it, if I were allowed to.
All you're being here is a troll, or perhaps you think I'm lying.
I can see that you don't like what I have to say then fine, but I wouldn't say it if it wasn't true.
#1039 to #1038 - swedz
Reply -1
(04/17/2012) [-]
LOL! Suddenly I´m a troll for giving my point of view of assholes like you? You´re speaking in the language of racism as a fact for sure. Faggots like you are less welcome than any other. You got some invalid points there, faggot.
#1040 to #1039 - finni
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
Well it seems like you are troll. Calling me a faggot all the time and not answering to any of my statements. Not sure what it was I said that was directed to any race though.

The only thing you come up with is things like calling me a faggot and a racist and not responding to my arguments, how is that not a troll?
#1043 to #1040 - swedz
Reply -2
(04/17/2012) [-]
I skipped all that racist rambling about false **** and so on. The fact is though that you´re a faggot for hating your own part-country. Just a faggot are what you are, and a pathetic one.
#1044 to #1043 - finni
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
1. You say I am incorrect at my statements, yet you don't read them or prove them wrong .
2. Criticizing your own part-country's policy does not make you a faggot or racist. That's called freedom of speech.
3. You call me pathetic, yet you're the one shouting words that doesn't mean anything. It's like a creationist in the Middle Ages calling you a blasphemer and anti-theist for claiming that the world is round, yet in the end the world is round, no matter how many words the creationist throws at him.
4. You're probably not even going to read this and just continue calling me a faggot and racist. I can play that game as well, but yet I don't. In my opinion and I think everyone else who reads your comments, you're the pathetic one.

Come on! Call me a racist! Call me a faggot! I don't give a flying **** about it!
#1059 to #1044 - swedz
Reply -1
(04/18/2012) [-]
Now you´re just being silly. Faggots like you dont deserve this imagination speech of *******. You´re being pathetic in many different ways and also a faggot. And that is todays fact.
#746 to #466 - yoper
Reply +2
(04/17/2012) [-]
That **** made me mad. Why is it called Hen? Should be called "Hey let's **** with youth's minds!"
Let's give guns and cars to little girls that want barbies to make them lesbians!
Let's give barbies to little boys that want cars and guns to make them gay!
#769 to #746 - finni
Reply +3
(04/17/2012) [-]
I don't know what to tell you. Sweden is not the country it once was.
I find it hard to be proud of being Swedish. I love Sweden's culture. I like the old stuff, but now it's a political correct, Islamic, feministic **** hole that is to be left to rotten.

Swedes don't have a say in Sweden any more. If you vote for the wrong parties then you can lose your job or perhaps risk getting killed, if people find out.

I live in Norway and I often criticize Sweden and when they ask why hate Sweden so much I answer "Oh I don't hate Sweden. I love Sweden, I just don't like the Swedes"
Of course I am pretty categoric when I say this, but it's true. It's mostly the Swedish Media and politicians I don't like. Sweden is a really ****** up country in so many ways.

Here for example is a video of something called "SCUM" showing a video: www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tQSOlF9ZZM

Scum stands for Society for cutting up men.
#1005 to #769 - Galante
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
This might sound like I'm an idiot since I'm not good a discerning true from fake. But is that video ******* real? Holy **** thats crazy.
#1023 to #1005 - WhiteyMcCrakrHonky
Reply +1
(04/17/2012) [-]
Naw it's fake, read the description
#461 to #290 - anon
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
Feminists only want women to have what they have been denied throughout human history: equality with males. The sane, intelligent ones aren't aiming for men to be second-class citizens, they just want the two genders to be treated with complete equality. Those who want more than that aren't feminists, they're just insane and shouldn't be listened to.
#474 to #461 - deltadeltadelta
Reply +6
(04/17/2012) [-]
Third wave feminism isn't about equality.

Feminism was originally about challenging traditional gender roles. Throughout history is was men which brought home the bread, and the women which raised the next generation.

The first wave feminists were about the vote, and second wave feminists were about equal opportunity. Men didn't fight the changes, there was little commotion. Now come third wave feminists, who have no real goal.

Third wave feminism shames women for their femininity, and demeans men. It isn't just a philosophy either, it's a political ideology entrenched in Marxism. Take a Gender/Women's Studies course and you'll learn all about the evils of Capitalism and the "Patriarchy". It's all steeped in misandry and women that don't subscribe to it are labeled as anti-women, self-hating women, traitors, slaves, etc.

Today, nearly all feminist leaders are lesbians. It's such a stereotype, but it's a very true one. Just look at Sweden's Feminist Initiative party. It's Sweden's resident lesbian party.
#451 to #290 - lebanonymous
Reply +4
(04/17/2012) [-]
Anons = u don't know their face, their reactions, their color, their race , their gender which is why they are perfect

bringing facts and objectivity to arguments
#484 to #451 - nimdajf
Reply +3
(04/17/2012) [-]
isnt that the same for ppl with accounts?
#436 to #290 - preshmilk
Reply +1
(04/17/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

#349 to #290 - skorpius
Reply +1
(04/17/2012) [-]
To the front page!
#338 to #290 - mmajunkie
Reply +40
(04/17/2012) [-]
so... do I like... give you my body now, or what?
#332 to #290 - camerel ONLINE
Reply +6
(04/17/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

#312 to #290 - conorpadraic
Reply +33
(04/17/2012) [-]
#302 to #290 - lukedempsey **User deleted account**
+50
has deleted their comment [-]