Holocaust is one mistake. :3

See what gggeeee said in this same reply chain.

I guess if you want to see it as one mistake.
But I see it as six million.
And Hitler wouldn't see it as any.

6 million Jews is/was debatable but I don't feel like getting into that, the holocaust as a whole was an idea itself, now if Hitler had said "Hey let's make each Jew, Gypsy and Nigger ever die in a different way for each person separately" then yes that would be x(unknown estimate) mistakes. But seeing as Hitler decided to single out the groups and have them gassed as the most effective way it would be more commonly seen as 1 (albeit large) mistake.

Word up, yo. Plus one.

Well, I guess I'm glad I could be an example of your knowledge, but I must point out that the objective that you have achieved through this vastly inadequate "debate" is rather trivial in comparison to the one I was seeking.

See, I was simply making a comment on why the original comedy was incorrect, in a short, to-the-point manner, in a way that some might find humorous. I was doing so, of course, to enhance the original comedy. I was adding on to the joke, if you will.

You, however, are severing the ties to the advanced level of comedy that is being extended for just so people can see you are smart.

Seems sort of parasitic to me.

No, I just woke up and figured I'd do some lazy trolling. I hate people who talk about the Holocaust or Hitler in general.

And now you begin to say this crude argument that was actualized by you, is really in the responsibility of someone you hate who is indeed the same person as yourself. Your very argument is a paradox. You say the conversation was generated through laziness which goes further to support the concept that everything you are saying is sloppy and lazy, and generally without coordination. You also take time to mention that this is all trolling which proves that there is no real motivation, intention or even an acceptably eligible purpose to your opposition.

So with all of that said and understood I must ask, why do you insist on approaching me on the contrary? Why do you head your reply with the word "No" when you just proved my very point?

I won't reply No simply because I only read the last sentence of your post. Instead:

TL;DR I have no time for pseudo-intellectual faggots like you. <3 Come back when you have something else but unstructured word-poop to come up with.

And now the seemingly unlimited vocabulary that was devised by my tired mind has agitated you into and enraged silence. You try your best to leave on a note that emphasizes on the meaningless concept that you are on a strict time schedule and the insincerity of my intellect, but everyone knows that you are browsing this website because you have time to kill and replies you gave to anyone on this thread just highlighted that fact. Your agitation didn't come from nowhere, it came from the fact that I bested you with what you say is "homosexual pseudo-intellect." If what I have is indeed "homosexual pseudo-intellect" and it has triumphed over you, then where does that leave you?

You then proceed to tell me to "Come back when..." as if I am going somewhere, when really you are the one running away.

But the very best part is that you dare say my comments are comprised of "unstructured word-poop" when you wouldn't be able to know that unless you actually did read my comments which goes against your down-the-nose "TL;DR" statement. Along with this I leave you with the idea that you started this thread trolling, but left mad.

Who is the real troll?

Didn't say anything about you being a homosexual. I just called you a bundle of sticks. Learn to read.

In the current cultural slang, after a couple of hundred years of literal erosion "faggot" no longer means a "bundle of sticks" especially not in this context.

And don't tell me to learn how to read when you are complaining about the length of my comments.

I'm just saying, you completely misread my comment and failed to understand the meaning behind it. I'm not even complaining about the length of your comments, I simply said it was too long for me to bother reading.

Which is complaining about length. And misreading your comment is a lot better than not reading it at all.

I'd rather have you not read what I say rather than misinterpreting my words, and I think you'd agree to that.

Pointing something out != complaining. If you think so, I hope you don't reproduce.

Well, it's good to know your opinions on things, but I assure you I will pay no mind to them and reproduce as freely as I please. And this isn't about whether misinterpreting is better than actually reading, it's about which displays more of an ability to read.
And we both know that the misinterpretation was probably the result of some other stimuli than illiteracy, judging by everything that I'm saying.
And just for the record
Complain: To express dissatisfaction or annoyance about a state of affairs or an event.
"...it was too long for me to bother reading. "
You are expressing the dissatisfaction and annoyance that my comment is too long for you to read.

And also, you are right that identifying isn't equal to complaining, but they are more related than you seem to know. The act of complaining is a more specific version of the act of identifying, as you are identifying something as unsatisfactory or annoying. So, yeah you were pointing something out, but you were pointing out that you didn't like it.

TL;DR

Yeah, that's what I thought.

Whatever.

You seem a little upset.

Counting each individual death in a mass murder can't be counted as one "mistake". The decision was a mistake, the execution was deliberate.