NO!. . Howabout ' c' lari' a' i' ii' i' iii' isit my macs. The plural of lego is lego. That is all.
x
Click to expand

Comments(310):

[ 310 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #5 - RobsonT (04/03/2012) [+] (12 replies)
The plural of lego is lego.
That is all.
#24 - twatter (04/03/2012) [+] (1 reply)
Those are not Legos.
#103 - RykenX (04/03/2012) [-]
mfw my mom bought me megabloks
mfw my mom bought me megabloks
#83 - omahgawd (04/03/2012) [+] (2 replies)
That's duplo, not lego.
That's duplo, not lego.
#333 - anttihh (04/03/2012) [+] (1 reply)
#46 - certifiedidiot ONLINE (04/03/2012) [+] (13 replies)
#234 - neoncookie (04/03/2012) [-]
may need to enlarge
#200 - Cainamogel (04/03/2012) [+] (5 replies)
Those are Duplos. Legos started in 1949 with the first plastic interlocking bricks that are still produced today. Although Duplo is owned by Lego, the two have different marketing departments that operate independently of each other.
#62 - anonymous (04/03/2012) [+] (3 replies)
Oh god
#18 - nordicmike (04/03/2012) [+] (2 replies)
That isn't lego
#145 - melolsoohard (04/03/2012) [+] (2 replies)
**melolsoohard rolled a random image posted in comment #14 at LAD ** mfw sex
+16
#121 - goran **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#89 - justderpin (04/03/2012) [+] (6 replies)
go
+15
#104 to #89 - icanhazlolz **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#72 - breakfastlunch (04/03/2012) [-]
That's not Lego
That's not Lego
#292 - thegoodandevil (04/03/2012) [-]
THOSE ARE ******* MEGA BLOKS
#188 - rollmania (04/03/2012) [-]
**rollmania rolled a random image posted in comment #48 at Twin Babies Groove to the Music ** hfw
#139 - grimmwaters ONLINE (04/03/2012) [-]
Nope.
Nope.
[ 310 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)