Math Pun. First post... sub if you decide im worth it.. math pun
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (88)
[ 88 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#29 - smithmurraygers
Reply +46 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
#4 - PurpleAtrocity
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
You're implying you can take the square root of a negative buddy. No.
#5 to #4 - anon id: 8cde3a01
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
-1*-1=1 bro
User avatar #6 to #5 - madobnoxious
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
yes but what two numbers multiplied give a negative number?
#31 to #6 - scantoz
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
its (-x)^1/2
#14 to #6 - anon id: 8cde3a01
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
-1 * 1 = -1
User avatar #28 to #14 - smithmurraygers
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
It must be the same number, and both numbers must be either negative or positive. So no, you can't.
1*1=1
-1*-1=1
User avatar #9 to #6 - PurpleAtrocity
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
thank you for being intelligent.
#8 to #4 - scantoz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
1/-x I believe.
#10 to #8 - scantoz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
I mean -x^1/2
User avatar #11 to #4 - onlyanonymous
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
its is +/- radical 1 bro
User avatar #12 to #11 - onlyanonymous
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
*radical x
User avatar #13 to #12 - PurpleAtrocity
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
there are no two negative numbers that multiply to be a negative. You can not take the square root of a negative without it resulting in an imaginary number.
#19 to #13 - anon id: 8cde3a01
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
may i ask what might transpire if x happened to be negative?
User avatar #22 to #19 - PurpleAtrocity
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
imaginary numbers. you can only graph in an imaginary system, and then since everything is imaginary, you have nothing.
User avatar #43 to #22 - robtheninja
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
No if x happened to be negative 4 for example, then y would be 2. (- -4)^(1/2) is the same thing as (4)^1/2
#24 to #22 - coldasdryice
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
u can graph any real number on an "imaginary system" (argand diagram) it just has an imaginary component of 0, but this is unecessary. If x were -1, then the equation y = sqrt(-x) would be sqrt(1) = 1, which is quite real
#16 to #13 - adamks
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
Which are a part of numbers nowadays, its categorizes itself under complex numbers.
User avatar #17 to #16 - PurpleAtrocity
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
They are IMAGINARY. you NEVER USE THEM IN REAL LIFE. You give me one real life situation where I will use these numbers.
#21 to #17 - coldasdryice
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
physics and engineering, specifically electrical engineering
User avatar #23 to #21 - PurpleAtrocity
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
maybe in theoretical physics, but in applied physics, you'll probably never have an imaginary anything. because you're APPLYING it
#25 to #23 - coldasdryice
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
complex numbers are used with currents in electricity
#18 to #17 - adamks
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
I can't, and yes they are imaginary, but they are a part of our number system, like it or not.
User avatar #15 to #13 - onlyanonymous
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
forgot the i
User avatar #53 to #4 - partnerintroll
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(03/20/2012) [-]
domain: x</=0
User avatar #32 to #4 - jefglv
Reply +17 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
It's called i! i! It's ******* awesome! You can like do loads of **** with i!!! You can totally work out complex trigonometric function with ******* i! i's the **** bra! Some dude named Euler was totally fantasising about i and then he was like, "Dudes! I should, like, totally do something with i!" And he made an equation and BOOM! We now know the equation for oscillators with viscous damping....and, well most other things too since Euler's equation helped trig generally....But **** yeah oscillations!

Yours, A very drunk 2nd year Uni student
User avatar #33 to #32 - PurpleAtrocity
Reply -9 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
You're speaking to me as if I don't know what i is, even though I've mentioned it below. Keep your shirt on. and yes, I know about eulers identity, I'm a mechanical engineering student at Michigan Tech.
User avatar #36 to #33 - jefglv
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(03/19/2012) [-]
I'm not saying you don't know what it is but I am saying you are not thinking about how awesome it is! I mean...whoa! It's got like it's own letter and everything! Not just any letter....but i! as in, "i own dis ****!" It's magical!
User avatar #54 to #36 - PurpleAtrocity
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(03/20/2012) [-]
You do realize that they use any letter for the square root of negative 1 right? In electrical they use k.
#47 - Danzig
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(03/20/2012) [-]
cot(x)
#59 - yetanotheruser
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(03/20/2012) [-]
I fixed it.
#67 to #59 - Nikzilla
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/20/2012) [-]
Overlooking your terribad syntax, its infinity (im not asian)
User avatar #93 to #67 - yetanotheruser
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/24/2012) [-]
True, I should have said as x approaches zero, not limit as x approaches zero.
User avatar #75 - tonyspinners
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(03/20/2012) [-]
For all you mathee's who are orgasm'ing with laughter right now, please explain what this is about
User avatar #77 to #75 - caluchi
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(03/20/2012) [-]
The ways in which the person's arms are bent is how the graph of the functions below it look. The one with "crap" just means you ****** up.



...





I'm so asian...
User avatar #78 to #77 - tonyspinners
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/20/2012) [-]
I appreciate the explanation, but I'm going to go sit in a corner now.... and just ponder
#64 - NAPOM
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(03/20/2012) [-]
#48 - cancerousiguana
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(03/20/2012) [-]
fixed (with beastly drawing skills)
#57 - pluginbaby
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(03/20/2012) [-]
Lets test it out, as you can see here i am perfectly capable of doing all the moves
Lets test it out, as you can see here i am perfectly capable of doing all the moves
User avatar #49 - ChronoBoost
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(03/20/2012) [-]
You can't take an even root of a negative number, so SQRoot(-x) is like not having any arms
User avatar #51 to #49 - partnerintroll
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(03/20/2012) [-]
domain= x</=0
User avatar #56 to #51 - ChronoBoost
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/20/2012) [-]
Actually, that does make sense. Was thinking of SQRoot(-1), not -x.
#58 - crashxjr
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(03/20/2012) [-]
Comment Picture