Resurrection level: Kenny

#8 - freemason

Reply+133

(03/09/2012)[-]

fixed. that was bothering me

#102 to #8 - skjalg

Reply+53

(03/10/2012)[-]

the head-to-body ratio is too damn high!

#40 to #8 - thesilverpanther**User deleted account**

-4

has deleted their comment [-]

#214 - lolzordz

Reply+41

(03/10/2012)[-]

about 30 times in ten minutes

#240 to #214 - pleasewelcomejc

-8

has deleted their comment [-]

#257 to #240 - hazardousfool

has deleted their comment [-]

#260 to #257 - huskycreeper

Reply0

(03/10/2012)[-]

B...B...But he wasnt anon...

#263 to #260 - hazardousfool

Reply+1

(03/10/2012)[-]

Am i blind??!!

#264 to #263 - huskycreeper

Reply+1

(03/10/2012)[-]

IDK! whats my username?!?!?!

#266 to #264 - hazardousfool

Reply0

(03/10/2012)[-]

huskycreeper!

#267 to #266 - huskycreeper

Reply+2

(03/10/2012)[-]

CONGRATURATIONS!! YOU ARE MOST CERTAINLY NOT BLIND :D

#268 to #267 - hazardousfool

Reply0

(03/10/2012)[-]

Thanks,mister!

#271 to #268 - huskycreeper

Reply0

(03/10/2012)[-]

NO PROBLEM! GLAD TO HELP!

#204 - misterbonzo

Reply+31

(03/10/2012)[-]

Fixed

#77 - xxvengancexx

Reply+27

(03/09/2012)[-]

Fixed?

#74 - whoovesthedoctor

Reply+26

(03/09/2012)[-]

#78 to #74 - amythestoneohone

Reply+9

(03/09/2012)[-]

#82 to #78 - yyetaxa**User deleted account**

has deleted their comment [-]

#128 to #82 - Endofzeeworld

Reply0

(03/10/2012)[-]

No! I love Tom Baker!

#129 to #128 - Endofzeeworld

Reply0

(03/10/2012)[-]

I know this isnt him, btw.

#79 to #78 - whoovesthedoctor

Reply+3

(03/09/2012)[-]

#80 to #79 - amythestoneohone

Reply+3

(03/09/2012)[-]

#76 to #74 - Endofzeeworld

Reply+7

(03/09/2012)[-]

**** YEAH DOCTOR WHO.

#120 to #76 - EdwardNigma

Reply0

(03/10/2012)[-]

He is more commonly in torchwood though.

#127 to #120 - Endofzeeworld

Reply-1

(03/10/2012)[-]

He got his start in DW, and I don't watch Torchwood, so Idgaf.

#91 to #74 - eembee

Reply+6

(03/09/2012)[-]

#236 - ohwhoafosho

Reply+25

(03/10/2012)[-]

fix'd*

(inb4 my ms paint skills are off the charts)

#25 - Juigiknows

Reply+21

(03/09/2012)[-]

Resurrection level: Happy Tree Friends

Bitch please, get on their level.

#208 - superclamsquared

Reply+15

(03/10/2012)[-]

#298 - alexanderdouble

Reply0

(03/10/2012)[-]

**alexanderdouble rolls 84**

#307 to #298 - lonwol

Reply+11

(03/10/2012)[-]

**lonwol rolls 22**

#310 to #307 - alexanderdouble

Reply+2

(03/10/2012)[-]

#308 to #307 - lonwol

Reply+1

(03/10/2012)[-]

#312 to #308 - alexanderdouble

Reply0

(03/10/2012)[-]

Oh .. the torture xD

#11 - redwolfradolf

Reply-20

(03/09/2012)[-]

............ the last two aren't real....

#12 to #11 - icecreamconelol

Reply+10

(03/09/2012)[-]

And Jesus is? I hope you're just trolling

#14 to #12 - redwolfradolf

Reply-6

(03/09/2012)[-]

Roman records from the time of Jesus' life, as specified in the book of Luke.
Verify that a man named known as "Jesus of Nazereth" was executed.
Wether you beileive that he really resurected, well the oc seems to take for granted that he did.

#18 to #14 - houseofbrick

Reply+9

(03/09/2012)[-]

There were several people named "Jesus of Nazareth" executed.

Yeshua was a pretty damn common name >.>

It's like seeing "Michael Johnson from [insert redneck town here] executed".

#30 to #18 - redwolfradolf

Reply-4

(03/09/2012)[-]

But not everyone named Yeshua was like the jesus we worship. The roman records were pretty specific, as is usual for Romans, not to mention, there are other instances of archeological proof.
There is a carving by a roman soldier, which mockingly depicts the Peter mourning the crucifixion of "His God"
Sound Familiar?

#32 to #30 - houseofbrick

Reply0

(03/09/2012)[-]

There were a lot of crackpot religions that started up. Jerusalem had plenty of people starting various cults and off-shoots of religions and I'm sure there was more than one guy named Peter in Jerusalem who mourned.

I always thought the point of faith was that it didn't matter if there was physical, historical evidence...

#33 to #32 - redwolfradolf

Reply-3

(03/09/2012)[-]

Doesn't hurt that there is proof.
Besides, any person who has actually looked into it, knows that a man named Jesus who had, at one time, thousands of disciples really existed 2000 years ago. that much is fact.

To be honest I don't know where you're getting your facts. Here's the picture I was talking about.

#34 to #33 - houseofbrick

Reply0

(03/09/2012)[-]

I'm a bit skeptical about that kind of thing because throughout history (especially the 16th-19th centuries) some people made fake evidence for a lot of things, like the Shroud of Turin which was proven to be made FAR past the time of Jesus.

I'd just rather not worry about it and let people believe if they believe or don't believe if they don't.

#39 to #34 - ryanfitzy

Reply+1

(03/09/2012)[-]

#50 to #39 - redwolfradolf

Reply0

(03/09/2012)[-]

This isn't a fight, this a logical debate

#41 to #39 - houseofbrick

Reply0

(03/09/2012)[-]

This would have to be the most laid-back fight I've ever witnessed on the internet. Nobody's invoked Godwin's Law, no mothers have been insulted, etc.

#42 to #41 - ryanfitzy

Reply0

(03/09/2012)[-]

You've been here for month & a half. Obv. you are new here, also good job getting trolled by an atheist.

#43 to #42 - houseofbrick

Reply0

(03/09/2012)[-]

Correction: I've had an account for a month and a half. I've lurked Funnyjunk for something like 2-3 years. Also, he's a bad troll if he's trying to incite anger. All he incited was discussion.

#52 to #34 - redwolfradolf

Reply0

(03/09/2012)[-]

You have to ask yourself though, why would someone fake this?

It's clearly mocking Jesus.

#57 to #52 - houseofbrick

Reply0

(03/09/2012)[-]

Fake it so there's "proof" for people to find that he was real?

It doesn't matter if it shows a negative portrayal or a positive one, it would be considered evidence. I like to keep an open mind for that kind of thing, but there have been way too many fakes for me to take most of that stuff seriously.

#59 to #57 - redwolfradolf

Reply0

(03/09/2012)[-]

So why would Peter have willingly gone to his death, when just a few months before, he denied Jesus with a curse?
To be honest though, I can't beleive you don't know that Jesus is real, that isn't up for debate, anyone can tell you that the man himself was indeed real.

#64 to #59 - houseofbrick

Reply0

(03/09/2012)[-]

There's been debate about it for ages and debate will continue for ages to come. The fact is that there is not enough evidence to support the theory on evidence alone, objectively. However, if you feel that there is enough evidence to support the facts, then that is your business, because whether he existed or not does not really matter, at least in this life.

I do not believe that there is enough evidence to support the claims that there is either was a figure named Jesus, that there is even a God, or that there is an afterlife at all. However, I'm not going to outright deny that they exist and worry over the matter forever because I don't think it really matters. It's important that we make this life worth something because, from what it seems, this is probably all we have.

#73 to #64 - redwolfradolf

Reply0

(03/09/2012)[-]

Well your last statement the both of us agree on, at least when it comes to making your life worth something.
As for the rest of it, I still think you're wrong, but i'll respect your opinion.

#45 to #14 - keniley

Reply0

(03/09/2012)[-]

Incorrect. Jesus' names was not truly "Jesus", it was Yeshua.
so where ever you read Jesus of Nazareth was complete ********.

#54 to #45 - redwolfradolf

Reply0

(03/09/2012)[-]

ok, so the roman records didn't precicely say "Jesus of nazereth"
But then they were in Latin, so they didn't use the exact word "Execution" either.
It's called translating.

#22 to #11 - anon id: 4bbe51a4

Reply0

(03/09/2012)[-]