Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - BLACKFRAMEPERSON
Reply 0
(03/04/2012) [-]
**BLACKFRAMEPERSON rolled a random image posted in comment #344 at Another day at Apple ** I hate to get scientific here, but if that were the case the population would stay the same. However, the population increases everyday. So no matter how incredibly ******* awesome that would be, it is, in fact, impossible.
#2 to #1 - beastpwnrlol [OP]
Reply +1
(03/04/2012) [-]
very smart thinking but isn't it also possible that while going into "the light" the walk to the light takes days or weeks all depending on the person and how fast it is?
#3 to #2 - BLACKFRAMEPERSON
Reply 0
(03/04/2012) [-]
I suppose, but if that were the case the population would still stay the same. The amount of time makes no difference but, rather, the amount of people. Either way the population wouldn't change.
#4 to #3 - beastpwnrlol [OP]
Reply +1
(03/04/2012) [-]
true, but during the time it takes for the person to walk to the light others may die and others may be born
#5 to #4 - BLACKFRAMEPERSON
Reply 0
(03/04/2012) [-]
But, if the picture was correct the only way others could be born is if others die. So if that is how things work the person who was taking longer to walk in to the light would be a child who did not come out of the mother's womb on the set date. Just as those who die before they are meant to would be premature babies, and miscarriages would be people who were diagnosed dead for a few minutes and came back to life, right? So the amount of time it takes for someone to reach the light after they die would only affect the amount of time the new baby would take to come out of it's mother. In which case the population would not vary at all. The timing of when the baby is born and the person dies would change but the amount of human beings would not. Just as those who have not found the light (poltergeists) have not been reborn yet.
#6 to #5 - beastpwnrlol [OP]
Reply +1
(03/04/2012) [-]
ok you win sir :)
#7 to #6 - BLACKFRAMEPERSON
Reply +1
(03/04/2012) [-]
ma'am* and thank you kind gentleman.
#8 to #7 - beastpwnrlol [OP]
Reply 0
(03/04/2012) [-]
sorry ma'am would you be interested in a cup of tea?
#9 to #8 - BLACKFRAMEPERSON
Reply 0
(03/04/2012) [-]
Indeed. And here is some not butter for the crumpets.
#10 to #9 - beastpwnrlol [OP]
Reply 0
(03/04/2012) [-]
OH! HOW DELIGHTFUL! we can dine on my fine china
#12 to #10 - BLACKFRAMEPERSON
Reply 0
(03/04/2012) [-]
LOVELY! and here are the crumpets!
#14 to #12 - beastpwnrlol [OP]
Reply 0
(03/04/2012) [-]
OH NO! my dishes arent clean let me put them in the dishwasher :D
#15 to #14 - beastpwnrlol [OP]
Reply 0
(03/04/2012) [-]
*give them to
#11 to #10 - beastpwnrlol [OP]
Reply +1
(03/04/2012) [-]
btw
#13 to #11 - BLACKFRAMEPERSON
Reply 0
(03/04/2012) [-]
nice xD