Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #8 - ravarshi (03/01/2012) [-]
not xxx unless she's naked, gimmie a nsfw version. Also, dakota fanning. goddamn she grew up... i remember seeing her when she was like 4. now she's like 22 and hot.
User avatar #94 to #8 - retardedboss ONLINE (03/02/2012) [-]
You know what's not right? her sister. she's like 12 or something, but if you watch super 8. she looks a lot older, and worryingly attractive.
#99 to #94 - ravarshi (03/02/2012) [-]
that's not her fault, that's the fault of the american public and the fact that parents dress their children (or dont dress them and allow them to look like whores) at the tender age of 12. More disturbing than anything i know.

these people whould not be parents, children should not be sexualized at all until they are of legal age to consent....

Also, age on consent should be a straight up number for all nations to agree upon, they should not be verying like on this image. 13 is too young IMO, and i'm appalled at myself when i look at the 15-16 year olds who look 18+ and say they're attractive.

The parents of the children in this example should have never procreated. If (and when) i ever have children, (and it's a daughter) I'll be the dad who says, you touch my daughter, you lose body parts. I guess that makes me a hyprocrite, but i'll deal with such a title, because parents need to reign in their children and make them dress appropriate. It's common sense people, there ARE pedophiles who WANT to fuck your kids. regardless of their age. and that shits fucked up.
User avatar #44 to #8 - andrewjla (03/01/2012) [-]
she just turned 18 dude...
User avatar #52 to #44 - ravarshi (03/01/2012) [-]
i dont keep tabs on actors or actress age, so i wasn't aware she just turned 18. but she is hot now.
 Friends (0)