Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#27 - nukanukanuka (02/24/2012) [-]
**nukanukanuka rolled a random image posted in comment #62 at Poke >:D ** The russian beated the nazi why did you show an american soldier victorious vs german?

******* american think always they are the best enjoy your vegetable pizza fatty.
#90 to #27 - nukanukanuka has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #73 to #27 - DrBobsPatient (02/25/2012) [-]
Well, it seems more like the western allies they did:
1. DDay, which created the second front, and the success of that and events from it destroyed majority of the war factories in german occupied territory
2. they never supported germany
3. we fought, most of the time the russians hid and let the environment do work. 65-70% of casualties on the eastern front were from the winters
4. russia would've used rock because they go things with strength over tactics.
#32 to #27 - pinesolpowers (02/24/2012) [-]
This image has expired
It was a joint effort. Without Americans the Russians might be German, without Russians Americans might be German.
#91 to #32 - nukanukanuka (02/25/2012) [-]
Also america have started 70% of war in the world after 1900 , they legalize weapon , ****** food, Bestiality in 90% of their states, they have esclavaged black and chinese people for building their countrie, american want to make ****** law in other countrie, they spend billion of dollard in war but nothing in medical sector, more people in america die by heart attack and **** due to their ****** food, and they claims OMG OMG TERRORISM IS A MENACE LETS WASTE BILLION OF DOLLARD FOR THAT, you governement should not exist.
Also you have steal america from pacific native indian they lived for protect the land you destroy it. you killed them and you called them savage.
User avatar #92 to #91 - pinesolpowers (02/25/2012) [-]
You are one retarded ************ aren't you. The right to bear arms is in our constitution, all people should have the ability to defend themselves. Our food is not ****** , it is possible for anyone to become fat when you don't make smart choices when eating. People die idiot, not all Americans die from heart attacks because of "their ****** food." Terrorists are menaces, and those billions of dollars were "wasted" for oil, which if we hadn't have wasted that money, we would've been further in debt than we are now.
#93 to #92 - nukanukanuka (02/25/2012) [-]
You have 3 mcdonald each 100 meter, you have no culture, yes most people die from heart disease but your country as the most case of that, defend themselve? whit legalise weapons? are you ******* kidding me moron? you are just bag of money for you governement idiot american are not like other people, they are just stupid bag of meat wasting theyr life and theyr money for **** .
User avatar #94 to #93 - pinesolpowers (02/26/2012) [-]
The reason we have firearms is for defense retard, if our country is ever invaded we should have the right to fight back. If someone enters our home uninvited we should have the right to force them to leave, or kill them if they threaten us. Anyone can make a weapon out of almost everything, so to criticize America for making firearms legal is stupid, weapons are everywhere. Yeah, McDonalds is everywhere, so ******* what? We have no culture, you are a moron, America is called a big melting pot for a reason (we are culturally diverse, because I don't think you can comprehend what a melting pot is). I'm not a bag of money for my government, America controls their government, we pay taxes so that we can have the luxuries that we have today. There's a reason why Greece is in such a bad position today. Oh and please tell me where you are from, so I can find flaws with your country.
#95 to #94 - nukanukanuka (02/26/2012) [-]
This is the role of the army to fight back invader not the role of the civilian , the only thing happen whit legalized weapons are slaughter and robbery ( virginia tech?).

You say mcdonald everywhere so ******* what? juste obese people everywhere, your governement make pizza a vegetable not a proof you have no culture in food?

and you not responded to the 3/4 of what i say

Everybody hate your country..

Your troop in irak kill more innocent than terrorist all the people in irak want the american soldier leave
User avatar #96 to #95 - pinesolpowers (02/26/2012) [-]
You're stupid, weapons are everywhere (make-shift prison weapons for example), and in case of invasion, the military can't be everywhere, civilians need to be able to defend themselves. Obese people aren't everywhere idiot, if you've ever been to America you would know that it's just a stereotype put on us by other countries to make us look bad. We don't kill more innocent people than terrorists, we strengthen the Iraqi military so that one day when we do leave, the Iraqi military will be able to defend against terrorism. Without America, you have no idea how bad your live would be. (the same can be said for many countries.) You still never said where you were from, but I understand why, you live in a ******** .
#97 to #96 - nukanukanuka (02/26/2012) [-]
Stop ******* kidding me who could invade america? if that happen you will drop bomb everywhere like usual, yeah you can make a weapon whit a sharp object, but you think you can do equal damage than whit a gun???

you know stereotype are not very true but they are not false your country have the more obese people in % to your global population and the more death by heart disease, you can't avoid the evidence.

a couple of day your soldier have burned hundred of coran in front of iraki people to provoke them, iraki people claim in the street they want american leave.

Did you know the armeni slaughter ? turkish have killer thousand of armeni people and america knowed it they can stop it but they didn't say nothing because america haved financial accord with turkish.
User avatar #98 to #97 - pinesolpowers (02/26/2012) [-]
Do you have any idea what the cold war was? That's a good example of fear of invasion. Who really gives a **** if people here are fat? They made themselves that way, not our government. You have one case of soldiers burning the Koran, protesters retaliate by throwing grenades at soldiers, I'm sure Allah wasn't pleased with either party. The armeni slaughters had nothing to do with us (if America stepped into every battle, our country would never last), nor does it have anything to do with this debate. **** , half of the things you say have nothing to do with this debate. You're one of the more idiotic people I've spoken with on the internet, yet you continue to speak, that's tenacity, which I commend you for. However, I'm sick of talking to you; so I'll leave you with this, no matter what you say, no matter what you do, America will pull through.
#99 to #98 - nukanukanuka (02/26/2012) [-]
And once again the american abandonned cowardly like in vietnam...
User avatar #100 to #99 - pinesolpowers (02/26/2012) [-]
Ok, I was gonna stop, but you brought up Vietnam. We left Vietnam, because we didn't want to lose any more soldiers, not out of cowardice, but out of respect for soldiers families. We could have dropped nukes all over Vietnam, but we didn't for the well-being of the world. I have a great appreciation for what all soldiers do, and when you make a remark like that, it irks me the **** on. I'd greatly appreciate it if you would stop being stupid, sit down, and shut the **** up.
#101 to #100 - nukanukanuka (02/26/2012) [-]
Yeah no nuke, just napalm for killing people in terrible pain and ruining land and vegetation.

And you say you are great people who respect soldier.. what the **** america..
User avatar #102 to #101 - pinesolpowers (02/26/2012) [-]
People die in wars man. :)
#103 to #102 - nukanukanuka (02/26/2012) [-]
So go in a war bitch
User avatar #104 to #103 - pinesolpowers (02/26/2012) [-]
lol, if you only knew.
#36 to #32 - nukanukanuka (02/24/2012) [-]
Also they killed million of civilian and innocent people whit their nuke, and they crie every years for 2000 fatty who die in 11 september , WTF america?
User avatar #76 to #36 - DrBobsPatient (02/25/2012) [-]
if the atomic bombs weren't used, the war would continue and make things worse off anyways. If the war ended up on the island of japan, everyone was going to fight or commit suicide. women, children, everyone. So instead of killing them that way, two atomic bombs were dropped instead, which probably saved a lot more. The whole island of japan/all the citizens were at war because they believed and did everything for the emporer, whereas 9/11 was a terrorist attack on unaware people just because.
#34 to #32 - nukanukanuka (02/24/2012) [-]
No only the russian and maybe the english beaten nazi, these fatass american do nothing and they join the war just because pearl arbor.

american can't win vs poorly equiped vietniam, how can they beat nazi?
#37 to #34 - pinesolpowers (02/24/2012) [-]
This image has expired
You know absolutely nothing about warfare. The single reason we lost to Vietnam is because we were fighting in their territory, we lost soldiers because we didn't know the land. Pearl Harbor isn't the sole reason why we joined WW2, Nazi Germany was sinking many American transport and trade ships, hurting our economy and killing civilians.
#38 to #37 - nukanukanuka (02/24/2012) [-]
What about killing million innocent civilian japanese
User avatar #45 to #38 - samxdaxman (02/24/2012) [-]
well considering we weren't going to just let them kill us (much to your disappointment ), it was either we nuke them (more american and japanese lives spared) or invade and take over (more american and japanese lives lost).
User avatar #40 to #38 - pinesolpowers (02/24/2012) [-]
The estimated casualties of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined are 240,000. Most Japanese at the time were involved in the war effort somehow, and not innocent civilians.
#41 to #40 - nukanukanuka (02/24/2012) [-]
Yeah "estimated" victims "most" japanese are involved, sure

where those number come? from american who killed them?
User avatar #47 to #41 - pinesolpowers (02/24/2012) [-]
The numbers come from body counts and total population at the time of the bombing. Yes, Americans killed the Japanese. The Japanese also killed the Americans. There is no innocence in warfare.
#53 to #47 - nukanukanuka (02/25/2012) [-]
Japanese soldier killed american soldier.

American soldier killed japanese civilian, and ruined an island for years whit radioactivity

How can you count the bodies? whit nuclear weapon, million of corpse should have dissapears.

Your country starts war everywhere and blame their victims, you call people you have killed for petrol "terrorist" , you call people you kill for testing your nuclear wepons "dangerous communist"
#72 to #53 - heyjudewatsup **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #64 to #53 - lordcthulhu (02/25/2012) [-]
Well it was either that or we would had to put Operation Downfall into action, the invasion of Japan. If we took the Battle of Okinawa as to how the Japanese would react to the invasion, there would be somewhere between 105,000 to 268,000 American casualties and 1.7 million to 4 million Japanese casualties with 400,000 to 800,000 deaths. Remember, the Japanese were not ones to surrender, most would probably kill themselves or die fighting rather than being taken prisoner.

Long story short, there would of been many more casualties if we went to Plan B.
#63 to #53 - darthblam (02/25/2012) [-]
You ******* know NOTHING about history or how war works! ******* learn what you are talking about before you spew ******** that is WRONG.
User avatar #59 to #53 - pinesolpowers (02/25/2012) [-]
Like I said, we have knowledge of the total population before the bombing. Millions did not die, I have no idea how many times I have to say that. The Japanese killed civilians. Before you assume things about me, I am not American, I'm from Spain, and I happen to live in America. Al Qaeda is a terrorist group organization, we have strengthened Iraqi military to protect themselves from Al Qaeda. However, our primary purpose in Iraq was oil, which would have made a huge impact on the world, the trillions of dollars we have in debt now, could have been much more. There is a reason why people become weary whenever someone begins to test WMD's. The reason you test WMD's is because you plan to use them, which will lead to war.
User avatar #58 to #53 - diniwdezer (02/25/2012) [-]

American casualties: 416,800
Soviet casualties: 8,800,000 to 10,700,000 (basically over 20 times the amount of military deaths that America had).

Objectively speaking, the war effort had MUCH greater impact on the Soviet Union than the USA.

That said, the bombing of Japan is justifiable. Japanese propaganda and imperialism was very strong, so an absolutely demoralising blow was required to make the fanatical Japanese population even consider surrender. That said, the loss of life and suffering caused is incomprehensibly large. Even so, it could have been worse were it not for the bombings because the war would probably have lasted from several months to several years longer without it.
#71 to #58 - anonymous (02/25/2012) [-]
in regards to the number of casualties
**** yeah, allies kick ass
 Friends (0)