Failed No Fap Nov(Retest Here)

I'm gay. Impossible to fail this exam :)

so whatcha doin this week?

I'm with you on that one, bro. :)

cool that you are talking about it in public i'm proud of you too^^

Hehe, thank you. ^^

Well... this isn't really all that 'public', now is it? I mean, I don't even have any friends on here.

I'm gay too... So I failed the test? Or... did I pas? I'm confused as shit... If I dont fap... I win? But... wut...

Open your mouth

Would love to.

me too. op failed

your gif was more arousing than the post

Even this gif is more arousing than the post

Well, since I reached the end of the post...

try emogasm.com

Hell even this one is hotter then the bloody post it self

You may have just helped me settle an argument i have with a mate cheers :)

But woman (A) DOES exist, and I'm almost certain if I tried hard enough I COULD meet that person, where as woman (B) is merely a drawing/ creation of someone's imagination. I disagree with your argument.

It's just rubbing your dick to something that looks nice.

I'm sure that through all the effort you'd put in finding and convincing a porn star to have sex with you, you could create a virtual reality simulation allowing you to meet woman (b), or create a 3D printout, or genetically engineer another woman to match her exactly.
See where I'm going with this?

Getting a porn star to have sex with you is not hard. A) have money B) lie and tell them youre a porn star.

With that money you could create a virtual reality simulation etc etc, it's a big circle.

It's ambiguous when someone says money. I could easily pay the porn star 1000 bucks to have sex with me ( assuming she's new on the scene). So how exactly would $1000 develop a VRS? It'd be a shitty one at that neglecting all the obvious flaws in that argument.

At the end of the day, A) is real B) is just a drawing..... I will never meet B or touch B, but I DO have the possibility of meeting A and touching A. Thus fapping to women A is different from fapping to a drawing simply because somewhere that person DOES exist.

With $1000 you could hire an actor you pretend to be said character, if you were really that desperate or way inclined, again, it's a big circle; by your logic, it would then be acceptable since sex is within the realms of possibility.
Besides, if you had the finances to waste on $1000 for sex, what are you doing masturbating to porn on the internet?

My point that comparing the two is illogical. One's a drawing and one's real. The whole argument that they aren't different is wrong. That's my argument; I think I've proved that.

Nah, never once did I say they weren't different, I only said that from a point of sexual gratification, they may as well be equal, as the chances of ever meeting either is effectively zero unless you're willing to spend stupid amounts of money.
So from that point of view, masturbating to either is no different.

Again, "stupid amounts of money is ambiguous" all the people in california could spend dick all to meet a porn star and have sex with them

The fact is that porn stars are out of reach for most people, and I doubt anyone could ever meet every single girl in their fap folder, thus, like I said, the chances of meeting either is next to zero.

They could if they wanted it enough... The chances of meeting one is possible. the chance of meeting a real life drawing is next to 0.

Okay then, say you have 50 separate girls in your fap folder, you fap one then say
"right, now that's done, I better go have sex with her". You pay an ambiguous amount of money for the aforementioned sex, then sit down and fap to the next girl before saying
"right, now that's done, I better go have sex with her"; rinse and repeat.
How realistic is this scenario?
Sure, it is possible, but like I've said before, the chances are next to zero, you'd be just as well masturbating to what ever you want, because the chances are so slim.

That's all fine and dandy but I think you're making a hyperbole out of the notion that neither exist....my point is that it is POSSIBLE.

To be fair that is fairly mutual, I always tend to do that, but let me put it like this:
Back at the start with the simple chart (which I didn't make) it said that "fapping to women A is no different to fapping to women B", which is true, since it never mentions sex in any way shape or form, the whole argument that it is possible to have sex with women A is irrelevant considering nothing to the contrary was ever claimed.
All it ever claimed is from the point of view that both 2D images that you can in no way touch or interact with, fapping to either is no different.
One is a photograph of a woman, the other is a drawing of a woman.

Agree with you

Yeah...that wasn't really hard.
Not even a pants twitch.