My whole life was a lie. He had a nose! /user/tannershanaynay. VOLDEMORT tallis Had a nose in the first movie.. no one understands the lack of nose and it pisses me the off. his appearances reflects the fact hes becoming less and less human. hence the snakeish appearance. nose Not right on voldemort
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (78)
[ 78 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#2 - herpderppppp
Reply +50 123456789123345869
(12/06/2011) [-]
no one understands the lack of nose and it pisses me the **** off. his appearances reflects the fact hes becoming less and less human. hence the snakeish appearance. but people like you ARE TOO ******* RETARDED TO GET THAT. HURR I WATCH MOVIES AND LAUGH AT THINGS I DONT GET BECAUSE IM 12 AND I DONT KNOW WHATS GOING ON. **** YOU. **** you. go back to your ******* twilight.
#3 to #2 - markyoz
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(12/06/2011) [-]
You are way to angry for that one single thing. His appearance changing was not talked much about in the books and movies, then only real thing we have to go on is what JK has stated in Q&A's and random theories.
#4 to #3 - herpderppppp
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/06/2011) [-]
well im mostly mad about teenage girls on tumblr making jokes about that. and is that how you learn about story elements? by being told flat out? didnt you pay attention in 8th grade? its a pretty basic reading skill to put together pieces.
#5 to #4 - markyoz
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(12/06/2011) [-]
If you're saying that the books/movies told exactly how he changed his appearance and why you're mistaken.
#6 to #5 - herpderppppp
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(12/06/2011) [-]
im not. they dont mention it once and youre right. im saying use some ******* intelligence that is required to understand art.
User avatar #7 to #6 - Sharu
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/06/2011) [-]
the vast majority of the public are stupid, best not to get so angry. Its a fact that will never change
#8 to #7 - herpderppppp
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(12/06/2011) [-]
i know and youre right. which is why im angry all the time.
#10 to #8 - markyoz
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#9 to #8 - markyoz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/06/2011) [-]
Most people don't read between the lines nor think about stuff outside of what its told to them in the book, personally I love to "geek" out on harry potter stuff.
User avatar #25 to #6 - aldheim
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
'understand art?' Has anybody considered the fact that they made this hea first movie *before JK wrote the fourth book? All the movie people knew at this point was Voldemort was on the back of Quirrel's head. Hell, JK probably didn't even know what would happen in the fourth at this point, not exactly anyway. So they put Voldemort on the back of Quirrel. It makes sense that they would give him a nose, lacking any other information. This is a continuity error, not a message about Voldemort's plunge into inhumanity.
#29 to #25 - herpderppppp
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
im not talking about the movie. im talking about girls on twitter in 2011 who make jokes about him having no nose in the majority of the movies.
User avatar #30 to #29 - aldheim
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
why you follow little girls on twitter?
#31 to #30 - herpderppppp
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
i didnt say little girls. i said girls.
User avatar #32 to #31 - aldheim
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
Alright whatever. Why do you follow people on twitter if all you're going to do is get pissed about their intellegence level? Besides, it is funny that he doesn't have a nose.
#33 to #32 - herpderppppp
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
if your argument was true and i ignored everyone who was stupid, i wouldnt be able to talk to anyone ever again. and no its ******* not.
User avatar #35 to #33 - aldheim
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
So...... you add people, actually literally go out of your way to make sure that you can look at their tweets, and then all you do is bitch and whine about what they have to say? Yeah, an they're the dumb ones..... You're not some genius that nobody can comprehend, you're just an over pretentious asshole with more holes in his logic than Abraham Linchon and Master chief having a tea party on Mt. Vesuvious. And yeah, it is.
User avatar #19 to #2 - funnyjunktitan
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
actually his appearances reflect the fact that up until the point where he almost died from harry when he tried to kill him he looked like tome riddle did in the flashbacks but when he almost died something happened and he shrunk and got creepy weird and when he went back to normal size and such the rest never changed back (now that i think about i guess that is becoming less human)
User avatar #11 to #2 - fumanchux
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(12/06/2011) [-]
i feel you
do you feel me?
User avatar #83 to #11 - fumanchux
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2012) [-]
nobody watched crank yankers apparently
so many red pinkies in this here thread

User avatar #12 to #2 - xivideus
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(12/06/2011) [-]
Actually it was a mistake they made giving him a nose in the first movie, he wasn't meant to have one... But I get what you mean.
Not the same thing but: It took me years to convince me friends they got a new Dumbledore.
User avatar #15 to #2 - xplosevdiarrhea
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(12/06/2011) [-]
I thought he became less human as he split his soul, which occured before he even scars Harry. Not an expert, how I remember.
#13 to #2 - gzng
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/06/2011) [-]
what's a 12 year old doing here?
#16 to #2 - anon id: c564718e
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/06/2011) [-]
thank you i didnt want to describe how it worked
User avatar #36 to #2 - loliownyou
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
No actually, in Goblet of Fire when Voldemort was reborn, one of the things in the pot was Nagini's venom. Voldemort even told Petter Pettigrew to "milk" Nagini earlier in the book, meaning get Nagini's venom.
#37 to #36 - herpderppppp
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
thats actually a cool little fact. but if you look at the shriveled up little baby thing as he dumps it in the pot, it still has no nose.
User avatar #40 to #37 - loliownyou
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
Oh, I never realized he didn't have a nose before the pot, I had just been told the Nagini venom story for a long time. I also noticed the milking part after hearing about it. Just trying to share some HP facts.
#42 to #40 - herpderppppp
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
the more you know :D
#50 - theepiccunttainter
Reply +23 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
in the 4th movie he gets reborn into a new body, thats when he loses it.

just to prove how stupid your argument is: When he was Tom Riddle, he had a nose.
User avatar #52 to #50 - jackraban
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
You forgot to add that he didn't have a nose because J.K Rowling wanted him to look more snake-like.
User avatar #55 to #52 - jjamesgordon
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
Actually, he loses his nose in his original body as well because of his experimentation with the Dark Arts. Says so in the sixth book.
User avatar #56 to #55 - jackraban
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
Nope, when the 4th book came out, Rowling stated in an interview that (while on the subject if Voldemort) that he doesn't have a nose, to make him look more snake-like. Also, Voldermort has a silent T.
User avatar #58 to #56 - jjamesgordon
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
That may be so, but it still says in the Sixth book that he was losing his nose when he applied for the position. Re-read Half-Blood Prince.
User avatar #77 to #58 - jackraban
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
I am not saying it doesn't, I am fully aware that it does. I think she was smoking the good stuff when writing Half Blood prince
User avatar #81 to #77 - jjamesgordon
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
Well, you'll notice things like that in ANY long saga. Take Stephen King's Dark Tower series, for instance. There are plenty of plot holes and contradictions in the series, just because it was written over the span of almost forty years.
User avatar #14 - meggiepoo
Reply +19 123456789123345869
(12/06/2011) [-]
He looses his nose and Crabbe looses 400 lbs and turns black.
User avatar #23 to #14 - wertologist
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
loses* and hahaha. He did turn black. he pulled a reverse Micheal Jackson!
User avatar #78 to #23 - meggiepoo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
Thank you for fixing my failed spelling. :D
User avatar #57 to #23 - justkimi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
Actually, the Black kid is Blaise Zabini.
User avatar #79 to #57 - meggiepoo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
Really? What happened to Crabbe?
#80 to #79 - justkimi
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
Comment Picture
#49 - OrionPax
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
#53 - anon id: 730aa03f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
After he is "evicted" from Quirrle's body, he has to live inside a snake. After spending three years living through a snake, he develops snake like features, hence the flat nose.
User avatar #54 to #53 - jjamesgordon
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
Actually, no. Because in Half-Blood Prince when Harry is inside Dumbledore's memories, Voldemort returns to Hogwarts to apply for the Defense Against the Dark Arts job. It says then that his features were already beginning to melt and become waxy, and take on a serpentine appearance.
User avatar #71 to #54 - darkknightrises
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
strangely though, when we see the flashback of Voldemort killing Lily in the Potter house, Voldemort has his newer, serpentine appearance. (movie 8)
#62 to #54 - anon id: 730aa03f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
Ok, fine, you're right, it's a combination of Voldemort's connection with snakes and the horcruxes.
Why the hell would Rowling make such a stupid connection?
The snake is the animal of Slytherin because Salazar like the look of it.
Nagini is one of just 7 horcruxes, he should also look like an amulet, a goblet, and a book.
Speaking parseltounge isn't quite explained, but it's coincidental and a learned ability.

Living in a snake's body for three years makes hundreds of times more sense.
User avatar #63 to #62 - jjamesgordon
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
Never said anything about Horcruxes, mate.
Read the book.
#82 to #63 - anon id: 730aa03f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/10/2011) [-]
I did read all the books, other people said Horcruxes.
#59 to #54 - anon id: 730aa03f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
In the book or the movie?

Perhaps both are contributors, but I'm pretty sure the first book said something about the curse of unicorn blood sustaining his life was that he 1) had to share a body, and 2) sharing the body could permanently alter his physical form.
User avatar #61 to #59 - jjamesgordon
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
You'll find that Rowling kinda contradicts herself a lot. Most of the replies on here are true.
#17 - natnoo
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(12/06/2011) [-]
It's because it's his soul attached to somebody else's body. when professor quirrell dies his soul disappears. Then when he comes back and peter pettigrew puts him in the cauldron he forms a larger more human body which is slightly deformed because his soul has been split... thats why he had a nose :)
#64 - runawayfromsharks **User deleted account**
+6 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#43 - thenewtroll **User deleted account**
+6 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #48 to #43 - poppingpins
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
Then why, when there are flashbacks of him killing Harry's parents, does he not have a nose if that was before his resurrection. I suppose it could be Harry's visions of it and he pictures Voldemort as he knows him, but I prefer to think the movie makers ****** up.
User avatar #47 to #43 - mogossien
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
No. It was Harry's blood, not the snake. He just looks snake-like because he's becoming less human, because of his soul being split so many times. Doesn't anyone read the books?
#65 - rellergert
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
User avatar #21 - xxMAJISTYxx
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
No the real reason for this is because when Voldemort creates Horcruxes his body turns more snakelike. During the first movie Voldemort still hadn't created his final Horcrux, Nagini. So we can assume after splitting his soul and sealing it into the snake no more nose.
User avatar #22 to #21 - robopuppy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
Plus when Voldemort was finally brought back to life they used a reptilian creature in the process.
User avatar #28 to #21 - aldheim
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
Harry was his final, and accidental, horocrux. Not Nagani.
User avatar #34 to #21 - loliownyou
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/07/2011) [-]
No, one of the ingredients in the potion he was reborn in during Goblet of fire was Nagini's venom, earlier in the book you can hear Voldemort asking Peter Pettigrew to "milk" Nagini, meaning get hit poisen from him. Thats why he has a snake nose.