| Home | Social Board |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Subscribe |
| Channels Scratchpad & Games | |
| NSFW Content Random Board | |
| Brony Board | Games Board |
Report Abuse/Harassment
Report Bugs
Suggestions
Statistics
Contact Us
Unsubscribe from newsletter
RSS Feeds What? Lickitung is evolving!
| |
Links are not allowed.
You are allowed to post every 2 minutes and 10 seconds on the same page.
You are allowed to post every 2 minutes and 10 seconds on the same page.
Remaining character count: 2000
comments(8)
#6 -
banette (12/22/2011) [-] Are you kidding me?
Lickitung looks no better than Lickilicky.
They both look like giant pink blobs of fat with oversized tongues and an unusually dumb disposition, yet they are both official Pokemon who are awesome in their own ways and come from generations with both good and bad qualities.
Besides, pretty much all of the main games have the same story: A young hero starts out in their hometown with a fire, grass or water starter given to them by their professor and they work their way up to become the Pokemon master, so not only do Pokemon: Red, Yellow and Blue have pretty much the same plot as Pokemon DIamond, Platinum and Pearl, but the graphics are unusually bad, even for their time.
And as for the "where the Pokemon aren't Richard Simmonsgy as shit" (assuming you're talking about nothing but looks, as Lickitung's stats are worse than Lickilicky's), have you forgotten about Pokemon such as Mr. Mime, Jynx, Gloom, Weepinbell, Magmar, Slowpoke, Slowbro, Diglett, Dugtrio, etc.?
But anyways, my point is, first generation Pokemon are no better than the newer ones.
They have their faults and their good qualities---and nostalgia doesn't make something necessarily better than something you didn't grow up with.
Lickitung looks no better than Lickilicky.
They both look like giant pink blobs of fat with oversized tongues and an unusually dumb disposition, yet they are both official Pokemon who are awesome in their own ways and come from generations with both good and bad qualities.
Besides, pretty much all of the main games have the same story: A young hero starts out in their hometown with a fire, grass or water starter given to them by their professor and they work their way up to become the Pokemon master, so not only do Pokemon: Red, Yellow and Blue have pretty much the same plot as Pokemon DIamond, Platinum and Pearl, but the graphics are unusually bad, even for their time.
And as for the "where the Pokemon aren't Richard Simmonsgy as shit" (assuming you're talking about nothing but looks, as Lickitung's stats are worse than Lickilicky's), have you forgotten about Pokemon such as Mr. Mime, Jynx, Gloom, Weepinbell, Magmar, Slowpoke, Slowbro, Diglett, Dugtrio, etc.?
But anyways, my point is, first generation Pokemon are no better than the newer ones.
They have their faults and their good qualities---and nostalgia doesn't make something necessarily better than something you didn't grow up with.