This is a hilarious page, congrats on finding it.
99% if this is taken out of context, the other 1% is Judaism and not Christianity.
The main difference between the Old and New testaments are atonement: In the Old Testament, there had to be atonement for every sin, in blood. That's the way it was. The reason Christians say we have a loving God is because Jesus volunteered to be the ultimate atonement. No more punishments on the nation because of sins, no more animal sacrifices. (Speaking of which, the only human sacrifice in the Bible is Jesus. This stupid website says "The Bible promotes human sacrifice. Well actually it doesn't but it kinda almost does. Well God is still a butt head." Or something like that.) This site is completely laughable.

I'm an atheist, but i'm still skeptical that a lot of those weren't taken out of context.

Also, you can't have it both ways. You can't say "Jesus promoted this" and then say that Jesus didn't exist.

the old testament is the base for Judaism btw, also known as the torah. christianity wasnt created until after jesus died. also, jesus wasn't FROM the old testament, so how could you say jesus promoted all those terrible things?

and that last sentence turned pretty nonsensical, so im unsure as how to reply to that.

lastly, do you really think a website with a controversial name like evilbible is ever going to make christians want to change?

you do know that the christian bible has both old and new testament right? and the fact that the god that jesus mentions is the from the old testament. So if the god from the old testament promoted all those things shouldn't jesus believe in those things also? or did god change his mind? but isnt god supposed to be eternal, and never changing? he is god after all, which means he should be perfect. So why should a perfect being ever have a need to change his mind? or maybe he is not perfect. whats the point in worshiping an imperfect being?

look. I already know he doesn't exist. you don't have to bombard me. secondly, of fucking course i know that the bible consists of the old and new testament. the thing you left out was that in the new testament jesus was supposed to be the same as god. he was part of the trinity of son father and holy spirit, so he could change his earlier teachings. again, i dont believe in it, im just trying to see both sides.


getting away from that dreary subject, here's my favorite question to ask a christian.
"If Adam and Eve were innocent (without a concept of right and wrong) when they were instructed not to eat from the tree of knowledge, then how is it they're fault when they didn't know that it was wrong?"

They knew not to disobey God. They knew God was right but they still disobeyed Him.

It's kinda like not knowing WHY a rule is there, but knowing it is there for a good reason. Does that make any sense, at all? I'm having trouble putting this into words.

they didnt understand that disobeying god was bad. they had no semblance of right and wrong.

Because jesus was a jew?

and all jews promote the same ideals? that's like saying all muslims are terrorists.