| Home | Social Board |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Subscribe |
| Channels Scratchpad & Games | |
| NSFW Content Random Board | |
| Brony Board | Games Board |
Report Abuse/Harassment
Report Bugs
Suggestions
Statistics
Contact Us
Unsubscribe from newsletter
RSS Feeds charity
| |
Links are not allowed.
You are allowed to post every 2 minutes and 10 seconds on the same page.
You are allowed to post every 2 minutes and 10 seconds on the same page.
Remaining character count: 2000
comments(266)
#244 -
anonymoose (08/08/2011) [-] 
This isn't an anti-Christian post. It's saying people don't need to be religious to be good people and that Christians CAN STILL be heartless total douchbags.
#233 -
heroofwinter **User deleted account** (08/08/2011) [-] Carlos Slim Helu is the richest man in the world actually
#229 -
kneesocks (08/08/2011) [-] I'm an Atheist, and in no way a Christian supporter.
But, its his fucking hard earned money. He doesn't have to donate it to charity if he doesn't want to.
But, its his fucking hard earned money. He doesn't have to donate it to charity if he doesn't want to.
#232 to #229 -
omganinja (08/08/2011) [-]
i would agree if it actually was hard earned money. like it says in the post he gets his money from his salve labor run mines in Africa. He has someone else hard earned money. and if being a evangelist is considered hard work i have lost all faith in humanity.
#230 to #229 -
anonymous (08/08/2011) [-]
He's a "christian" preacher though. Not donating to charity is one thing, however, utilizing slave labor in diamond mines? That makes him one of the biggest hypocrites ever, and a huge reason as to why, although the Bible and Jesus are at the very center of my life, I flinch at being called a "christian." Jackwagons like this give that word a knife's edge.
#221 -
winstonotsniw (08/08/2011) [-] i feel all religions have there good points and there bad points, one of the bad points of just about all of them is the fact that they make you feel that everyone elses religion is wrong and to push your religion on others... this being one of the reason for almost every war in history.
my personal feelings on god is that there isnt one man out there conllorting everything in the world. i think everyone is in control of their own life and world around them. BUT i feel as long as a do good and try to progress myself mentally and physically every day and always try to do the right thing everyday of my life that if there is a god of one religion that he will not care what i believe in but the person i am.
my personal feelings on god is that there isnt one man out there conllorting everything in the world. i think everyone is in control of their own life and world around them. BUT i feel as long as a do good and try to progress myself mentally and physically every day and always try to do the right thing everyday of my life that if there is a god of one religion that he will not care what i believe in but the person i am.
#255 to #221 -
atrocitustheking (08/08/2011) [-] quote: "just about all of them is the fact that they make you feel that everyone elses religion is wrong and to push your religion on others"
> first, Ba'hai and Unitarianism
> second, that's called an evangelistic religion. Not all religions are evangelistic.
>examples of non-evangelistic religions: Judaism, Hinduism, Jainism etc.
quote:" this being one of the reason for almost every war in history"
> only one I can think of immediately is the Crusades, and really, that had less to do with forcing others to convert (as is sometimes believed) and more to do with 'lol, do whatever the hell i want, claim it's god's will, u mad?'.
> religious propaganda and religious justifications certainly play a role in the wars of the world
>(see: ww2 japan, roman empire, cold war, english civil war, american civil war)
> that said: religious propaganda =/= religious war
> religious justification =/= religious war
> most wars have more to do with greed and/or fear (eg. we've gotta get them before they get us)
> first, Ba'hai and Unitarianism
> second, that's called an evangelistic religion. Not all religions are evangelistic.
>examples of non-evangelistic religions: Judaism, Hinduism, Jainism etc.
quote:" this being one of the reason for almost every war in history"
> only one I can think of immediately is the Crusades, and really, that had less to do with forcing others to convert (as is sometimes believed) and more to do with 'lol, do whatever the hell i want, claim it's god's will, u mad?'.
> religious propaganda and religious justifications certainly play a role in the wars of the world
>(see: ww2 japan, roman empire, cold war, english civil war, american civil war)
> that said: religious propaganda =/= religious war
> religious justification =/= religious war
> most wars have more to do with greed and/or fear (eg. we've gotta get them before they get us)
#215 -
anonymous (08/08/2011) [-] HOLD THE FUCK UP. If Warren Buffett pledged to give 99% of his money to charity, he only keeps $1 out of every $100 he gets. And he still maintains his third richest person in the world title? HOW MUCH DOES THIS GUY MAKE. TELL ME YOUR SECRETS.
#200 -
rigariga ONLINE (08/08/2011) [-]
I think people should be good without god as well.
But I'm still a Christin and when I was an Atheist I still did good things.
Goes to show you that its not that religion someone follows, it's their character.
But I'm still a Christin and when I was an Atheist I still did good things.
Goes to show you that its not that religion someone follows, it's their character.
#199 -
anonymous (08/08/2011) [-]
Slave labour aside, is it really incorrect for Mr Robertson to hoard all his money. I mean, he earned it. It's his. Why would he donate to some wimp ass charity which just sits around waiting from donations from God instead of actually doing something to raise funds legitimately, or to some lazy homeless fucks who'd squander the money as soon as they received it anyway. Just sayin, there are other ways of solving a problem other than just throwing money at it.
But yeah, the slave labour is kind of a dick move on his part.
But yeah, the slave labour is kind of a dick move on his part.
#210 to #199 -
nicecontentbro (08/08/2011) [-] I see what you're saying, and I'm going to go out on a limb here and say you're wrong. Throwing money at a problem certainly isn't the best way to fix a problem, but when money is all you have that you can give, it's a good move. Rich people are busy people, and cannot donate their time to charities. So they donate their money instead. Does that make them worse people? No. It means they are giving what they can to help out the less fortunate.
And yes, that is a legitimate way for charities to raise money. How else would they earn it? If they got money from something besides donations, they would not be a charity, they would be a business. A business that would donate to a charity. >.>
And yes, that is a legitimate way for charities to raise money. How else would they earn it? If they got money from something besides donations, they would not be a charity, they would be a business. A business that would donate to a charity. >.>
