| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
#1245
-
N. Korean citizen (07/11/2011) [-]
ok so which sounds like more of a fairy tail christians believing in a higher power that created the universe or atheists believing that a bunch of star dust (and if the big bang made the universe where did the star dust come from?) coming together and exploding out time space and matter and a bunch of life somehow.
#1330 to #1283
-
N. Korean citizen (07/11/2011) [-]
Essentially, atheism is believing in the creation of the universe...
If you are a religious person, you would believe that Earth and everything on it was made for us by a Creator, which negates the natural order of how things really happened.
It would be ignorant to say you were Atheist but not believe that everything in that comment was true, because there's scientific proof that it is.
If you're atheist and don't believe in that, how do you think we got here? Aliens?
If you are a religious person, you would believe that Earth and everything on it was made for us by a Creator, which negates the natural order of how things really happened.
It would be ignorant to say you were Atheist but not believe that everything in that comment was true, because there's scientific proof that it is.
If you're atheist and don't believe in that, how do you think we got here? Aliens?
#1291 to #1283
-
N. Korean citizen (07/11/2011) [-]
i agree with you atheism and the big bang aren't together and are 2 different things.
though the pic works as again as there is no mention of god at all on how he could have formed life, planets...etc making it obviously an atheistic viewpoint
and there are few atheists who disagree with the big bang.
though the pic works as again as there is no mention of god at all on how he could have formed life, planets...etc making it obviously an atheistic viewpoint
and there are few atheists who disagree with the big bang.
#1285 to #1269
-
N. Korean citizen (07/11/2011) [-]
god didnt come from any thing and we cant understand that because we live in time and understand time and everything that lives in time. anything in time has to have a begining. but god doesnt because he is outside of time and we are inside of time. in other words god is somthing we cant understand because we live in time and he exsists out side of time so he can be infinate
ps. something cant come out of nothing your breaking your own rule there
ps. something cant come out of nothing your breaking your own rule there
#1296 to #1285
-
N. Korean citizen (07/11/2011) [-]
so cute.
you make up an imaginary creature and even tell me where it's placed.
but you can't understand him?!
you understand enough to know it's location and whether or not it exists?
hypocritical? i think so
anyways what makes you jump to the conclusion it exists? you're are simply making up an imaginary dude and giving him super powers i can do that as well simply replace god with fairies and give them the same powers or hell the invicible pink elephant that created all and is impossible to see.
ps: i never broke any rule the rule that is LOL EVERYTHING NEEDS A CREATOR BUT GOD is your rule.
i have never stated that everything needs a creator which makes you guys hypocritical does everything need a creator or not?! if you say YES then god needs a creator if you say NO then why can't space time always be there?
we know spacetime exists but god is simply imaginary unless proof is brought forward
you make up an imaginary creature and even tell me where it's placed.
but you can't understand him?!
you understand enough to know it's location and whether or not it exists?
hypocritical? i think so
anyways what makes you jump to the conclusion it exists? you're are simply making up an imaginary dude and giving him super powers i can do that as well simply replace god with fairies and give them the same powers or hell the invicible pink elephant that created all and is impossible to see.
ps: i never broke any rule the rule that is LOL EVERYTHING NEEDS A CREATOR BUT GOD is your rule.
i have never stated that everything needs a creator which makes you guys hypocritical does everything need a creator or not?! if you say YES then god needs a creator if you say NO then why can't space time always be there?
we know spacetime exists but god is simply imaginary unless proof is brought forward
u said god Iives outside the past present and future?
cuz u said he Iives outside of time and therefore your definition, so he doesnt exist then?
and aIso time isnt something i can expIain to u right now ,maybe u wiII see why when u grow some baIIs go to middIe schooI then to high schooI and to coIIege
cuz u said he Iives outside of time and therefore your definition, so he doesnt exist then?
and aIso time isnt something i can expIain to u right now ,maybe u wiII see why when u grow some baIIs go to middIe schooI then to high schooI and to coIIege
#1400 to #1315
-
codtenthprestige (08/11/2011) [-]
Harold camping was a numerologist, he took a bunch of random number values and did random math equations and came up with a bunch of ridiculous number values, so that's not really a valid example of an "idiot christian" or so your saying. you cant take a few bad examples and generalize all Christians that way
ya i believe jesus existed.
but how can u teII for sure that he came back to Iife?
that was 2000 years ago, as u say
they didnt have the investigative techniques they have then, that we do now
any magicians show they wiII die and come back to Iife
ever heard the quote "cant fooI aII the peopIe aII the time"?
but how can u teII for sure that he came back to Iife?
that was 2000 years ago, as u say
they didnt have the investigative techniques they have then, that we do now
any magicians show they wiII die and come back to Iife
ever heard the quote "cant fooI aII the peopIe aII the time"?
#1341 to #1267
-
N. Korean citizen (07/12/2011) [-]
Now, consider THIS option. My own little thought on the matter. As mankind progresses so does our technology and we discover more. Perhaps in the future we discover a time machine of sorts. Go back in time, tamper with things, thus creating ourselves. Sounds more probable than some man in the sky (or "out of time" ) making us.
There's a plausible answer. Where did we come from? Ourselves. How is that possible? Paradox.
I honestly believe that everything is a big collection of mathematical equations.
Suck it christfag. At least my little idea makes more sense than yours.
There's a plausible answer. Where did we come from? Ourselves. How is that possible? Paradox.
I honestly believe that everything is a big collection of mathematical equations.
Suck it christfag. At least my little idea makes more sense than yours.