FATASS.. ADD ME ON FACEBOOK! www.facebook.com/pages/Obscurity/156218607756186. Mt your. 1. post picture from comedy series 2. insert exact subtitles 3. post on funnyjunk 4. ??????? 5. profit! obscurity
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (258)
[ 258 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#55 - SuperAnimeFreak
Reply +54 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Comment Picture
#93 to #55 - willdabeast
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
#108 to #55 - VisibleNinja
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
#89 to #55 - waffleofdoom
Reply +18 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
#87 - GordenFreeman **User deleted account**
+48 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#102 to #87 - popcornadams
Reply -12 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
you were more dumb on the internet
#186 to #87 - gloogy
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
you mispelled gordon...
#107 to #87 - VisibleNinja
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
funnier*
#117 to #107 - Mahazama
-5 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #144 to #117 - zoovigger
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Please turn off your computer and read a book.
#127 to #117 - anon id: 965f009d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Idiot.
#123 to #117 - anon id: d6776af7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
It was funnier on the tv. >.>
#125 to #87 - holmesymcgee
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
"Funnier", not "more funny"
"Funnier", not "more funny"
#133 - nippleshit
Reply +46 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
1. post picture from comedy series
2. insert exact subtitles
3. post on funnyjunk
4. ???????
5. profit!
User avatar #138 to #133 - woodshark
Reply -37 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
I find this funny because it makes you a hypocrite.

1. Post list and end with profit.
2. Second from last have '????'
3. ??????
4. Profit

(Ha, it's funny because I also look like one! ....Just wanted to 'illustrate' my point).
User avatar #162 to #138 - genericaccount
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
How is that hypocritical? He didn't use screen shots from a tv show with subtitles. Instead he used a popular format to illustrate his point.
User avatar #168 to #162 - woodshark
Reply -8 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
No, he didn't.
He's making fun of the simplicity of getting thumbs, and the fact there seems to be a 'formula' of it because it is so overdone.
When he himself is also showing how simple it is to get thumbs, by doing something completely overdone.
User avatar #169 to #168 - genericaccount
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Well, with -25 thumbs, he must be right...
#223 to #169 - Parrot **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #170 to #169 - woodshark
Reply -9 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Oh ho ho, and now I introduce you to: Fact =/= Opinion.
User avatar #171 to #170 - genericaccount
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Fact : hypocrisy is the contradiction of your own rules and/or morals. He didn't contradict his point, therefore he is not a hypocrite. While he may have used a rather simplistic 'formula' to explain his point of view, he was in no way hypocritical.
User avatar #172 to #171 - woodshark
Reply -8 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Oh, but he did, by simply PUTTING his point across in the way he did. It would be fair enough if he had put 'This is overdone etc.' But he didn't, he used something which I have seen at least thirty times.
User avatar #173 to #172 - genericaccount
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
But did he use shots from a tv show with subtitles? No, he did not. If he had done so then yes, he would have contradicted himself, but he did not. Also, arguments are very common, by your logic since you are involved in one, you are a raging hypocrite.
User avatar #175 to #173 - woodshark
Reply -8 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Lol, I think you've got the wrong end of the stick. What I am saying is:
He used the list with the ??? and the profit!
This has been very much overdone. This makes what he has written very overdone.
He used this to point out something else very much overdone.
So by simply using something overdone to tell someone what they are doing is overdone, he is being a hypocrite.
User avatar #176 to #175 - genericaccount
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
And I'm saying although it is a very commonly used template, it does not render him a hypocrite as his point was that quoting a tv show gets you an unjust amount of thumbs.
User avatar #178 to #176 - woodshark
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Ah. xD My point was simply that he was using something overdone to point out something overdone. Not the whole unjust thing haha. Totally see where you are coming from now. Apologies that you thought I was going on about that, I really wasn't.
#190 to #178 - lulzoutloud **User deleted account**
+3 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#211 to #190 - bluejupiter
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
No YOU!
#269 to #211 - lulzoutloud **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#214 to #175 - yourewrong
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
In his comment he never said that the picture was overdone though. He said that it's stupid to take a scene from T.V., add subtitles and try to post it on here. Not once did he say it was overdone. So from any prospective you're wrong.
#136 to #133 - kingofish
-31 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#137 to #136 - nippleshit
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
#189 to #136 - lulzoutloud **User deleted account**
+2 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #183 to #136 - ThatTFguy
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Maybe not 0.001% but I agree with you nonetheless
User avatar #134 to #133 - syafizzaq
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
problem "funnyjunk"er??
#135 to #133 - bassforbreakfast **User deleted account**
+8 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #215 to #135 - larkable
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
1. ****** picture from comedy series?

Doesn't make much sense, sir.
#63 - bsomazzi
Reply +35 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
another family guy post with the exact words. Really? wtf!
#122 to #63 - unicornsaresexy
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
It's funny. Why does it matter?
It's funny. Why does it matter?
#139 to #122 - silverskittles
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Because you can just watch it on tv and they're taking good spots for actual funny junk
User avatar #147 to #63 - vynnle
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
I believe this is the Cleveland Brown show, but i could be wrong
#76 to #63 - theroboticpikachu
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
#83 to #76 - supahdonkeh **User deleted account**
+18 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#92 to #83 - willdabeast
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
#94 to #92 - supahdonkeh **User deleted account**
-3 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#95 to #94 - willdabeast
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Comment Picture
#101 to #95 - howlingstar
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Comment Picture
#104 to #101 - willdabeast
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
#268 to #104 - howlingstar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
haha
#81 - muff **User deleted account**
+34 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#270 to #81 - bsomazzi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
It is... but this would be family guy:P
User avatar #118 to #81 - Mahazama
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
When I saw it on the tv....
#195 - fooberdoober
Reply +33 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Actually jesus was not black, he was a raptor.
Actually jesus was not black, he was a raptor.
User avatar #205 to #195 - AdmiralDonuts
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
This is possibly the best gif i have ever seen.
#149 - fozzybearo
Reply +29 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
#7 - waffleofdoom
Reply +27 123456789123345869
(02/09/2011) [-]
Comment Picture
#61 to #7 - Xedan
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Feels good, man
#187 - swimteampie
Reply +25 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Actually, Jesus wasn't white, either. He was from the Middle East 2,000 years ago, the LAST place you'd find white people.
#192 to #187 - trunsako
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Very true, he probably had a very dark complexion but he wasn't Black. Not even the Egytians at the time were Black, and they were in Africa.
#194 to #192 - swimteampie
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Bully! Nubian archers and slaves to the Egyptians had very dark skin, and they were from Africa, but Jesus was never in Egypt, and was most certainly not a Nubian.
#196 to #194 - trunsako
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
My apologies, but I do not understand which side of the arguement you seem to be arriving from. What I was implying was the Egyptians resided in Africa but they did not have the physical appearance of an African. Jesus of Nazareth was Jewish, and if my History is correct the Jewish people Orginated from the civilization of Mesopotamia, and geographically is about in the middle of Iraq, which they were not African or had the Physical appearence of an African.
#197 to #196 - swimteampie
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
You would be correct in saying so, I was simply pointing out the fact that "black" people did exist in Jesus's time period, and the misconception may originate there.

Also, "bully" is common English slang for "great" or "fantastic". I apologize for leading you to believe that i was addressing you as a thug.
#207 to #197 - trunsako
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
I understood what 'bully' meant, but I was confused if we were at a disagreement or agreement. Thank you for clarifying that old bean.
#210 to #207 - swimteampie
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Actually, I was a bit boggled myself, old chap!
#216 to #210 - trunsako
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Well it seems we have come to an agreement, so I bid you adieu.
#219 to #216 - swimteampie
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Au revoir.
User avatar #274 to #219 - Charden
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/11/2011) [-]
That was awesome.
#221 to #207 - Parrot **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #200 to #197 - dayumshame
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
To add to this intellectual conversation, I would add that he was also a carpenter, therefore, would have most likely been very well built. So not only was he not white, he did not look like the Norwegian hippie we see today
#208 to #200 - swimteampie
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
I'd like to add something to your comment by saying that the origin of Jesus's "white" appearance dates back to Renaissance paintings, where artists like da Vinci and Michelangelo painted him as a white, Italian man.
User avatar #275 to #208 - dayumshame
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/11/2011) [-]
you are indeed correct. I applaud your intelligence with a thumb
#201 to #200 - swimteampie
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Exactly!
Exactly!
#188 to #187 - geezues
Reply +20 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
#203 to #188 - bluejupiter
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]
Knowledge is power!
#80 - bleepbloop
Reply +23 123456789123345869
(02/10/2011) [-]