SUPER DUPER TRICK!. OMG THIS TRICK WORKS, haha...
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

SUPER DUPER TRICK!

OMG THIS TRICK WORKS, haha..

+902
Views: 40035
Favorited: 166
Submitted: 01/28/2011
Add to favorites Subscribe to OldGregg Edit Image E-mail to friend
Share on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(451):

1 2 3 4 5 > >> [ 451 comments ]
Show:   Top Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
Show All Replies
User avatar #43 - illmakethatsammich (01/28/2011) [+] (3 replies)
...think of any number between 1 and 1,000,000,000,000
me: 88
1. square it
me: fuck dis shit i aint doing that
#52 - imaweshume (01/28/2011) [-]
oke choose any numbar between 1 and liek 503 and then times it by 0 and add 23.. ur number is 23!!!!
oke choose any numbar between 1 and liek 503 and then times it by 0 and add 23.. ur number is 23!!!!
#291 - MrFunkJunk (01/28/2011) [+] (3 replies)
A choice between 1 to 1,000,000,000,000.. and you all chose a 1 digit number xD
#190 - slaya (01/28/2011) [+] (1 reply)
its Friday and i just got home from school, no math please.
User avatar #98 - JNS (01/28/2011) [+] (21 replies)
wrong, i am now thinking of -34055
steps 1-6 have you do 23/6 which roughly equals 3.83
3.83 = k
step 8 does not change the value of k
the integral solves to [.5 log(x^2+x+2) - (arctan((2x+1)/sqrt(7))] from 0 to k
which reduces to -19.27
(-19.27)^Pi / k = -2838
-2838 can be pulled out of the sum, which equals 12
12 * -2838 = -34055
-34055 is not equal to 3
User avatar #89 - astronautcock (01/28/2011) [+] (2 replies)
ok.... think of a number between one and 100

now think of three

the number you're thinking of is three!!!!
#202 - bbdiehardinva ONLINE (01/28/2011) [-]
Why you gotta make me do math, bro?
#61 - AceOfShovels **User deleted account** (01/28/2011) [+] (6 replies)
This uses a simple multiplication/division trick. Square a number, so obviously if you divide by the number you'll get the same number again, but instead add the same number onto the square BEFORE dividing by it, resulting in your original number going into the square + x exactly 1 more time. So you have your initial number +1. That said, if you swap the order of steps 4 and 5 and instead do 5 first, it doesn't alter the results of the math whatsoever. It makes it apparent that no matter what number you choose, you will always obtain a number one integer higher than that before subtracting your initial number from it, leaving you inescapably with 1. And then you add 23 so by step 6 you will have 24 no matter what. The rest is irrelevant.
#186 - SmellyPinkVeJayJay (01/28/2011) [+] (2 replies)
Ok...I think of 53092873
1. Square it
...
...
#239 - itsmetiririca (01/28/2011) [-]
wait  
wait  
WAIT!!  
MATH ON FUNNYJUNK????
wait
wait
WAIT!!
MATH ON FUNNYJUNK????
#214 - fuckingmakeme (01/28/2011) [+] (1 reply)
MATH!!!
MATH!!!
#311 - sierramistfourteen (01/28/2011) [+] (1 reply)
i was doing fine until the last step lol
i was doing fine until the last step lol
#151 - Munchkinpunter (01/28/2011) [-]
Didn't do it!
Didn't do it!
#390 - MeanJoe (01/29/2011) [-]
i thought i could get away from calculus here. NOOOOO!!
#305 - sirpancholot ONLINE (01/28/2011) [-]
i got fish.. thats normal?
i got fish.. thats normal?
User avatar #303 - furryflava (01/28/2011) [-]
i came to laugh.not to do math
#392 - smellmydiesel (01/29/2011) [+] (6 replies)
When i saw that and realized i could do it was my first clue that i am a nerd...
When i saw that and realized i could do it was my first clue that i am a nerd...
#327 - TonytheTroller (01/28/2011) [+] (1 reply)
I Got 4.
I Got 4.
1 2 3 4 5 > >> [ 451 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)