Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #8 - loomiss (09/28/2013) [-]
Look at the water on the floor, clearly this was set-up with many failed attempts.
#49 to #8 - anon (09/28/2013) [-]
Did you see how that ******* kid landed?
#32 to #8 - dangosevenonethree (09/28/2013) [-]
Here's how I imagine the situation:
>Two brothers having a fun day of waterballoon/squirtgun fight
>Not allowed to play in driveway or on street, just the back yard
>This explains the water only being in the one area
>Older brothers develops an evil plan
>Go inside and fills a standard balloon, thinking "omg, he's gonna get soaked"
>Go to topfloor and waits for little brother to come looking for him/refill
User avatar #96 to #32 - terrtlefer (09/29/2013) [-]
There's a dry spot on the floor, clearly shows they hit him multiple times with many failed attempts.
User avatar #34 to #32 - loomiss (09/28/2013) [-]
If I remember right in the video it was an older girl talking an she says "He will never see this coming" or something like that.
And if they could only be in the backyard..why is there water on the driveway.. you confused me there.
#35 to #34 - dangosevenonethree (09/28/2013) [-]
Of course. I should have just said older siblings. Also, their house might only have a spigot on the driveway side of the house. That's how my house is at least.
#36 to #35 - dangosevenonethree (09/28/2013) [-]
So we'd have to fill up our guns/balloons in the driveway, then go to the back yard to keep playing.
User avatar #20 to #8 - lirfy (09/28/2013) [-]
Wouldnt there be a more 'splat!' pattern on the ground if it were to be a setup? Much like how blood splatters.
User avatar #28 to #20 - loomiss (09/28/2013) [-]
It is a water balloon. If they failed multiple times there would be multiple "splat patterns" eventually taking up the entire area surrounding the kid. Make sense? And also you don't find it weird how that is the only place that is wet, where he is standing..just randomly..standing there.
#29 to #28 - anon (09/28/2013) [-]
You need to draw people into the spot you want them to be in when you're doing something like this. Whether by drawing an X on the ground, or making the spot look different from the surrounding area. It doesn't matter if they stand directly on it, as long as they stop moving. The human mind is naturally inquisitive, and short of someone being in a rush or just not paying attention, most people will stop for a few seconds to investigate, or see what happens. Secondly, I highly doubt that they'd give the kid dry clothes every time it failed, and there's far too much water on the ground for him to have dried off before a successful non-exploding balloon knocked him to the ground. The water that's on the ground is probably from other successful attempts or failed attempts to hit people with a water balloon.
User avatar #30 to #29 - loomiss (09/28/2013) [-]
Or just hand with me, they missed at throwing the balloons and they exploded on the ground because let's face it water balloons aren't the easiest thing to throw, is was a considerable distance, and for the whole he was just checking it out.
No, nobody sees water on their driveway and stands there that long just to look at it, maybe if it was like something actually worth looking into going on it would make sense but water on the ground is so unimportant that I highly doubt he would stand there that long to just look at it as if that will solve something.
#12 to #8 - endospore ONLINE (09/28/2013) [-]
I also have it on reasonable authority that most comedy movies are, in fact, scripted and staged with many reshoots and that most people in them are actually actors.

doesn't make it less funny.
User avatar #13 to #12 - loomiss (09/28/2013) [-]
Yeah but those are movies, this was a vine video put out to make us think he was expecting it or that it was real when in fact it was just a dumb staged video.
Comparing the two is dumb, you're dumb.
User avatar #14 to #13 - loomiss (09/28/2013) [-]
 Friends (0)