Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#66 - tenmillionbears (09/19/2013) [-]
Deserved it.
Deserved it.
#126 to #66 - zebbyb (09/19/2013) [-]
What is this from? Sauce me betch!
User avatar #106 to #66 - ompalomper (09/19/2013) [-]
im not coming through?

well BEEP BEEP ************
User avatar #68 to #66 - willindor (09/19/2013) [-]
Why were they protesting?
#76 to #68 - orangerage (09/19/2013) [-]
All I could find - "This is in Sao Paulo, Brasil. Protesters angry about public services, perceived police brutality and government corruption are setting fire to cars, smashing up property and generally being a mob of crazy people." Sounds like they deserved it.
#90 to #76 - lordraine ONLINE (09/19/2013) [-]
If you know how bad it actually was in Brazil, no, they didn't.
User avatar #91 to #90 - orangerage (09/19/2013) [-]
I don't know about you, But I know that destroying (presumably) innocent people's property or getting in the way of a random person's car is not the right way to protest.
I wasn't saying every person involved in the protest deserved it. Only the assholes.
#141 to #91 - lordraine ONLINE (09/19/2013) [-]
In parts of Brazil the police are given bonus pay for killing orphans on the street.

If you actually knew. How bad it was. You would not say that.
User avatar #142 to #141 - orangerage (09/19/2013) [-]
Ugh, I'm done replying, I don't come here to argue. I'm not talking about the police or the rest of the protest, read damnit.
#143 to #142 - lordraine ONLINE (09/19/2013) [-]
No, you aren't talking about the police or the rest of the protest. You're just making sweeping assumptions about what the people who just got RUN THE HELL OVER did.

You have no idea what actually happened. You have no idea where they're standing. They could be protesting in the exit street of some government building. You're just assuming they did something to deserve it. And if you don't want to argue, then don't respond to people.
User avatar #144 to #143 - orangerage (09/19/2013) [-]
And neither do you -end it
#145 to #144 - lordraine ONLINE (09/19/2013) [-]
I know what's happening in the country, and thus, the context in which this picture exists, which is apparently quite a bit more than you do, and more than you can say. Stop replying to people and spraying your assumptions everywhere if you don't want an argument.
User avatar #146 to #145 - orangerage (09/19/2013) [-]
Holy **** , Look at the other video, doesn't look like they were blocking anything important, I saw a documentary on it last night, I know what they are protesting about. But you seem to think I'm against all of the protesters. Destroying random property is not the way to fix things and I'm not saying they all are doing that. Every protest has those types of people. I get it, you care, but damn stop acting like you have something to prove.
#147 to #146 - lordraine ONLINE (09/19/2013) [-]
Putting words in my mouth, missing the point. Getting upset. For someone who didn't want to argue, you sure love arguing.

I'm pretty sure you just want to have the last word.
User avatar #148 to #147 - orangerage (09/19/2013) [-]
Sigh... I'm not a bad person, I'm only replying to prove that. but you seem to keep acting like I was saying I knew everything I was merely talking about that one video and yet you were dragging politics and **** into it.
User avatar #150 to #149 - orangerage (09/19/2013) [-]
That just proves your the one acting like a child here.. Ill stop replying now.
#151 to #150 - lordraine ONLINE (09/19/2013) [-]
You should have stopped five comments ago. That's the last time you had anything to say besides "b-but I'm not a bad person" and "quit dragging politics into this."
#108 to #91 - seiga (09/19/2013) [-]
I have to reply to this...if you think vandalizing property is equivalent to physically injuring a human being or possibly killing them, you might have some serious moral issues to question.
User avatar #114 to #108 - watermelonkittie (09/19/2013) [-]
By doing that act of vandalism they are accepting the chance of retaliation. Always be prepared for the consequences
#136 to #114 - seiga (09/19/2013) [-]
Also you say they "deserved" the punishment. Yes, but that car had NOTHING to do with it, he was a RANDOM driver, he wasn't getting vandalized or hurt, he just f*cking ran over them. It's freaking obvious. Stop defending him.
#122 to #114 - seiga (09/19/2013) [-]
I just don't agree that retaliating with brutal force rather than equal consequences is right. It just makes you a prick, because you have a car and can potentially really hurt some civilians just cause they're protesting. It's rationalization like this that justifies police brutality and instances like this. I mean wow, some protesters getting in my way, but do you really have to frickin run them over..??
User avatar #123 to #122 - watermelonkittie (09/19/2013) [-]
But they are not protesting. The cars that drive by are usually from innocent people. They are just venting their anger on strangers passing by. How is that in any way justified? Protesting should be peaceful, build up pressure, but it should not consist of vandalism and violence. Those are crimes, and crime deserves punishment
#129 to #123 - seiga (09/19/2013) [-]
Look, I didn't say anywhere that what they are doing is justified. But what gives another civilian the right to punish them? How is running over another man justified?? They're not hurting anyone, unlike the guy in the car! Like, I don't see how this isn't obvious, or why this is an argument. And is he the police? It's against the law to injure someone. It is NOT against the law to protest.
User avatar #133 to #129 - watermelonkittie (09/19/2013) [-]
It still is not protesting. Again, those people are just criminals venting their anger. And how do you know that all the people who pass by won't get hurt. Hell, I can surely imagine that once the guy stops they open the door and drag the poor guy out and beat him with sticks. Or the rocks they throw breaks the windshield and the driver gets glass in his eye. The people passing by are being threatened, and that means you've got a right to defend yourself. It is a basic human instinct that kicks in. Those people are scared, they want to get out of there.
#135 to #133 - seiga (09/19/2013) [-]
I think it's fairly obvious that a man in a car is more safe than unarmed, unprotected civilians putting themselves out in risk of getting hit by a car or shot. I'm not defending these protestors, but I'm not ready to defend a guy who blatantly ran over people, protestors or not, he's just as equally guilty is all I'm saying, he's still doing something wrong, just like them. You seem to get the impression the man is completely innocent though while I'm saying both are guilty. I infer your stance when you say "the poor guy" and "people passing by are being threatened". Hell, we ALL know he isn't threatened, he just simply gives no f*cks, annoyed, arrogant, egotistical, and ran over some protesting men. Again, they are NOT innocent, but just because THEY are guilty doesn't mean the driver is innocent; get your facts straight, doin't be biased.
User avatar #137 to #135 - watermelonkittie (09/19/2013) [-]
Look at the gif again. Rocks are being thrown at the car, how is that not being threatened? The people running towards the car are not little children who just want to play. No, they want to damage the car and probably hurt the guy.
#138 to #137 - seiga (09/19/2013) [-]
Wait, I think you're arguing about the wrong thing here. You realize this thread is a reply to the gif above us right? Not OC? Because if you're talking about the kids with the turbans...I AGREE. But I'm talking about the gif by tenmillionbears where the men are just standing there, and get hit.
User avatar #139 to #138 - watermelonkittie (09/19/2013) [-]
Well. I dun goofed. Sorry about that mishap.
It was really interesting talking to you, though, Maybe again on some other content
#140 to #139 - seiga (09/19/2013) [-]
Haha thanks, it was an interesting argument, but I agree with you with the turban kids. I like debates as long as I can come to an agreement in the end, doesn't matter who's right. Yeah maybe, another content.
User avatar #77 to #76 - willindor (09/19/2013) [-]
Okay thank you for informing what those huehue-ers where up
User avatar #78 to #77 - orangerage (09/19/2013) [-]
No problem, found a video of someone in that crowd as well Car hits protesters during manifestation in Sao Paulo! [PATIENCE IS OVER]
User avatar #96 to #78 - dzaovnied (09/19/2013) [-]
Everybody thinking:
"That driver is trying to pass, he looks pissed but if we get in front of him he will surely stop"
 Friends (0)