Why didn't the sock make the cut?. .. I spent a really long time looking for a sock before I thought to check her actual foot. God damn it. Why didn't the sock make cut? I spent a really long time looking for before thought to check her actual foot God damn it
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (42)
[ 42 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#1 - hinedodmansmith **User deleted account**
+64 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#2 to #1 - jinkazama
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(07/28/2013) [-]
They're two different pictures, check the hand.
User avatar #6 to #2 - SuperSixONE
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
Tits don't get bigger in between pictures
User avatar #4 to #2 - AngusFTW
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2013) [-]
They fixed the hand to make it more photogenic.
User avatar #23 to #1 - anonymoose
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
Well, he tits were about 1cm too low for me to find her in any way sexual.
#18 - donglewotsit
Reply +52 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
I spent a really long time looking for a sock before I thought to check her actual ******* foot. God damn it.
#13 - freetoplay
Reply +20 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
They even shopped her boobs... They were fine to begin with...   
   
   
NOW THEY ARE FULL OF LIES!!!
They even shopped her boobs... They were fine to begin with...


NOW THEY ARE FULL OF LIES!!!
#5 - winternetz
Reply -20 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
lol why didn't the lazy ******* photographer take a better picture to start with? almost all of those changes could have been done for the picture.
#16 to #5 - anon id: 99f95896
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
Often times after the photoshoot, the company sends the pictures to be retouched and mark what they want redone.

The photographer just snaps the shots they are told to do.
#7 to #5 - lesmiserables
Reply +18 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
I work as an assistant photographer (I'm the low-paid guy who holds the mirrors for light reflection etc.) and I see about one thing or two he could have done better.
Dunno wat you are referring to.
#8 to #7 - winternetz
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
i mean, she could have worn a more supportive bra to make her breasts look more perky.

(i'm not a photographer obviously, i'm just guessing here) but wouldn't more light with the right kind of bulb make her skin look more colorful?

and the sock, why not get her to take it off before taking the picture?!?

sitting up a little more would have made her look more busty and also would have gotten rid of the wrinkles on her unshopped picture.

they could have taken **** out of that little nightstand bowl instead of digitally removing it as well.

it would have been quicker and cheaper to do those changes for the original photo i bet.
#10 to #8 - lesmiserables
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
I don't know about the bra and the sock, but I guess you are right.

About the light; I don't think they wanted to make her more colorful.

The photographer probably wanted a contrapposto, which creates a more dynamic photograph and makes the model look more relaxed.

Wrinkles are never a problem when doing professional photo shoots, because they are incredibly easy to photoshop away.

I think they actually ADDED more filling to the nightstand bowl, but I might just be retarded.
#9 to #8 - winternetz
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
i mean, the wrinkles on her stomach at least.
#12 to #7 - anon id: 057a135a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
r u also a lesbina? lol.
#20 - eclecticparadigm **User deleted account**
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
It looks like they are bouncing.
It looks like they are bouncing.
User avatar #32 - ooooooooooo
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
Her hand is completely different, it's weird
User avatar #15 - Hashenmier
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
Did they make her less skinny in the 'shopped version?
It seems that way
User avatar #17 to #15 - egosumproxi
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
Looks like they added more tit at least...
User avatar #14 - austone
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
The original looks better. Also when it changes to the bad (shopped) version, the high pitched ringing noise in my ear changes too, higher and lower and louder pitches and volume.
User avatar #19 to #14 - crowd
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
Same here, it's freaky.
User avatar #11 - luthervonappledorf
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
I prefer the original...
User avatar #24 to #11 - anonymoose
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
They're both pretty much exactly the same. How can you have a preference between the two?
User avatar #26 to #24 - luthervonappledorf
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
She looks more natural. There doesn't seem to be a lot of make up and she doesn't look like she's trying too much. Just looks more attractive to me.
#27 to #26 - anon id: ab0866eb
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
and then THIS phanact exists "oh I prefer natural women, I'm so sensitive, sit on my dick"
User avatar #29 to #27 - luthervonappledorf
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
Or, maybe, just maybe, I just like women who look nice naturally.
#31 to #29 - anon id: ab0866eb
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
nah shut the **** up, both those pictures look almost identical, the biggest change is the lighting, I know a ton of guys like you, really grinds my gears when you don't speak your mind, you speak what women want you to speak, thats ******
User avatar #36 to #31 - nowardspls
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
This noble anon speaks the truth. luthervonappledorf obviously is an idiot, however anon should have logged in.
#41 to #36 - anon id: ab0866eb
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
What if no account?
User avatar #39 to #31 - luthervonappledorf
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
So by actually speaking my mind, I'm not speaking my mind? How am I supposed to defeat that logic? What if I actually prefer it? What if I think that some women actually look better without make up?
User avatar #40 to #39 - luthervonappledorf
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
Oh silly me, what am I saying. Logic on the internet? Impossible.
#42 to #40 - anon id: ab0866eb
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
Logic? ***** please, you call that ******** logic? You must have a fetish for women in slightly dimmer rooms than normal rooms
User avatar #28 - bobthedilder
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
Now, would anyone happen to have a decent sized version of the first image without the bad shopping and whatnot, y'know...for science and stuff.
#34 to #28 - kuchikirukia
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
#38 to #34 - bobthedilder
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/29/2013) [-]
[ 42 comments ]
Leave a comment