Getting real tired of your shit. .. Look, I don't care what you're protesting, you can't just go around blocking traffic. Some people have to do, like go to work, or take someone to the hospital. Cars crashes funny fail owned pwned
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (221)
[ 221 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
User avatar #18 - Dakafal
Reply +380 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
Look, I don't care what you're protesting, you can't just ******* go around blocking traffic. Some people have **** to do, like go to work, or take someone to the hospital.
User avatar #169 to #18 - Zaxplab
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
Or get to their jobs at the hospital
User avatar #58 to #18 - baaltomekk
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
Yeah but this was a bit harsh. I would drive at a steady pace so they have time to get out of the way. If not, that's natural selection.
#74 to #58 - tarquinist
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
He didn't speed up while he was approaching them though, just maintained his speed.
User avatar #125 to #74 - EdwardNigma
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
And a bunch of them actually looked like they went in the way on purpose.
User avatar #134 to #125 - baaltomekk
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
Those are the most ****** up ones. Luckily in both ways, because there is a video of them jumping in front of the car.
#148 to #74 - anon id: cc5f5f8a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
you can see him speed up pretty clearly dude
User avatar #187 to #148 - shadsword
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
You are seeing his angle change. from the looks of it, he was stuck behind the other car in the gif and decided to go around him. i would guess he making somewhere between 5-10 mph from when he enters the frame to when he hits the line.
User avatar #36 to #18 - mmajunkie
Reply +20 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
Well he could've picked up a few of these guys and taken them to the hospital as well...
User avatar #25 to #18 - sinonyx
Reply +115 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
...or put someone in the hospital
User avatar #7 - Nightelfbane
Reply +67 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
if i could edit gifs, i would edit "TO THE FRONT PAGE" into this one and then post it in this content's comment section.
User avatar #10 to #7 - jimimij
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
hypnotoadtrance!!! we know you're unemployed and have nothing better to do.
#15 to #7 - aerr
Reply +307 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
The best I could do.
The best I could do.
#16 to #15 - Nightelfbane
Reply +20 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
awesome


like daffydills
#34 to #15 - skaffanl
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#91 to #15 - zorororonoa
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
awesome
#152 to #15 - punnybutsofunny
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
damn, why did your gif loaded faster than the post and looped more than once
#137 to #15 - mashedbacon
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
could you give it starpower as well?
#82 to #15 - rainbowrush
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
Yes
Yes
#56 to #15 - Nlulloff
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
you should of added OC to the stopped car and repost to the moving one
User avatar #4 - Sockopolis
Reply +118 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
You know what? Kudos to him. Those ******* deserve it.

Holding up traffic? What the hell. Some people have **** to do, you stupid hippies.
User avatar #20 to #4 - rhetoricalfunny
Reply -15 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
If people just sit silently on the sidelines like an obedient dog no one will listen, cause they have no reason to.

To be heard, you need to scream.
User avatar #23 to #20 - foelkera
Reply +34 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
Those people were probably screaming a lot after they got run over
User avatar #22 to #20 - RootBeerLover
Reply +21 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
then scream on the ******* sidewalk like a normal protester
User avatar #39 to #20 - ColorfulPenguin
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
Yes, because all protesters are supposed to keep the infrastructure from working, because they disagree with something?
User avatar #30 to #20 - organiclead
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
The best way to be heard is to get an innocent bystander fired and associate your cause with annoyance.
#57 to #4 - anon id: ab9439b6
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
It's all very well to give some flower-wanking douche a bitch slap or a broken nose, but im not sure about attempted murder... imo
#1 - LSone
Reply +105 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
Needs star power
Needs star power
#21 to #1 - lieutenantshitface **User deleted account**
+7 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#88 to #21 - sentryram
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#38 - johananas
Reply +90 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
I can't believe this ****!
User avatar #2 - doigboiger
Reply +82 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
that split-second glimpse of an angry old man just makes this better
#3 to #2 - ibishotel
Reply +22 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
#14 to #3 - nightdude
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
User avatar #19 to #14 - viscerys
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
A busload?
#26 to #14 - betesta
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
**betesta rolls 20** And this is where the dubs used to be.
#59 - darthblam
Reply +61 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
#52 - adu
Reply +47 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
Silly people, red rover is a game you play with humans, not cars!
Silly people, red rover is a game you play with humans, not cars!
#40 - lolfire
Reply +41 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
If that was me in the car I'd do the same thing.    
   
If you're going to stand on the road, you're going to get run down.
If that was me in the car I'd do the same thing.

If you're going to stand on the road, you're going to get run down.
#113 to #40 - areuserious
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
>MFW double bucket action
User avatar #80 to #40 - bullbrigade
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
Except you wouldn't have the balls, pathetic keyboard lion
User avatar #118 to #80 - lolfire
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
Well, it would involve learning how to drive. Which I should have started last year.

And yeah, I'm pretty confidant if when faced with that prospect that I'd do exactly the same as the guy in the content. You need to stop generalizing everybody on the internet as some autistic 12 year old.
User avatar #209 to #118 - bullbrigade
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/21/2013) [-]
Yeah ok, I'm looking forward to your murder trial.
User avatar #210 to #209 - lolfire
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2013) [-]
When it's my safety against the safety of others. I will always choose my safety.
User avatar #211 to #210 - vatra
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2013) [-]
The law will see it as choosing to hit people, as the safest action for you would be to sit there. I do think they deserved that though.
User avatar #212 to #211 - lolfire
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2013) [-]
The law only requires subjective recklessness.
If I saw my action as self defense due to my knowledge of people getting dragged out of cars and beaten half to death at protests then that would have to be taken into account.
I don't feel a jury would be sympathetic to the protesters if they understood that my reaction was proportionate to the level of threat I was feeling.
User avatar #213 to #212 - vatra
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2013) [-]
What you are talking about is called preemptive action, it is considered a baseless defense in court. The prosecutor would ream you in to next Tuesday mercilessly and you'd be found guilty of attempted murder, reckless endangerment and assault with a deadly weapon.
User avatar #214 to #213 - lolfire
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2013) [-]
What are you talking about ?
Pre-emptive striking is fully legal;

"There is no rule in law to say that a person must wait to be struck first before they may defend themselves, (see R v Deana, 2 Cr App R 75). "
User avatar #216 to #214 - vatra
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2013) [-]
No, but, there has to be probable cause for defense. "Some people get pulled out of cars" is not probable cause. It is a paranoid assumption and will be treated as such. Now If someone was heading towards your car in an aggressive manner, by all means, defend yourself. But without probable cause, you will be considered the aggressor.
User avatar #217 to #216 - lolfire
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2013) [-]
Palmer v R 1971 AC 814);

" It will be recognised that a person defending himself cannot weigh to a nicety the exact measure of his defensive action. If the jury thought that that in a moment of unexpected anguish a person attacked had only done what he honestly and instinctively thought necessary, that would be the most potent evidence that only reasonable defensive action had been taken ...
User avatar #218 to #217 - vatra
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2013) [-]
You just proved my point for me, thanks mate. "a person attacked" not a person assuming the could be attacked. Anyone can assume the can be attacked at anytime. I could assume the person walking past my house right now is planning to break in and steal my stuff at gun point, that doesn't give me the right to run out there and beat him ********. There has to be proof that you were actually under threat.
User avatar #219 to #218 - lolfire
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2013) [-]
That's where the subjective recklessness is concerned.
As long as I had knowledge of people being dragged from cars then that will be taken into account. That's a qualifying trigger for self defense.
User avatar #220 to #219 - vatra
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/21/2013) [-]
It really doesn't though, like I said, it is a paranoid assumption which will quickly get you convicted. Proof of that, The case about the murder of travon Martin, the man that killed him, assumed he was up to no good and when Travon tried to get away when contronted, he killed him because he assumed Travon would do something against him, that dude (I can't remember his name) is in prison now. Now back to the scenario we are talking about, the protestors are just walking back and forth in the way of traffic (annoying as ****, but not a danger), none of them are even paying attention to they guy that hit them until he pulls up to run his way through. The only anguish in that situation is coming from the two people being ran over.
User avatar #63 to #40 - mynameiskeanu
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
I lol'd so hard when he knocked the bucket off and there was another one under it
User avatar #78 to #63 - topperharly
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
me too, that was the funniest thing that happened to me today.
#92 - zorororonoa
Reply +23 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
everyone is saying how they would have done the same thing.  Yeah ******* right, none of us have the balls, admit it
everyone is saying how they would have done the same thing. Yeah ******* right, none of us have the balls, admit it
#121 to #92 - anon id: dd3f5388
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
I would do it again you mean..
I hit a few protestors with my four wheeler they were trying to protest infront of my house on the side walk.
My aunt grabbed her hunting rifle but my grandfather stopped her and ripped the gun out of her hands. She was gonna shoot someone, again..
#204 to #121 - anon id: 4f765437
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/20/2013) [-]
i never said this in my life because i think it's stupid and immature, but this time i'm dieing to say it...

'murricah