a² + b² = c². .. Pythagoras up in this a² + b² = c² Pythagoras up in this
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (78)
[ 78 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#2 - hypex
Reply +40 123456789123345869
(02/25/2013) [-]
******* Pythagoras up in this ****
#11 - thinginyrcloset
Reply +26 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#1 - sandynick
Reply -90 123456789123345869
(02/25/2013) [-]
If you think Michael`s story is surprising..., three weeks-ago father in-law basically also actually earnt $5143 working twenty hours a week at home and their best friend's mom`s neighbour did this for 6 months and made more than $5143 in their spare time at there computer. the advice here, WWW.Buzz75.ℂom
#53 to #1 - englman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
Just imagine... What if these people get paid per comment/red thumb received?..   
FunnyJunk would probably be where they're making their "$5,143+ a week.." And they're constantly coming back to brag about each others success to make themselves, and their friends, richer because they know we'll just keep giving them attention..
Just imagine... What if these people get paid per comment/red thumb received?..
FunnyJunk would probably be where they're making their "$5,143+ a week.." And they're constantly coming back to brag about each others success to make themselves, and their friends, richer because they know we'll just keep giving them attention..
#7 to #1 - darkspiribass
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
#8 to #1 - aetherpig
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
NOBODY CARES
#22 to #1 - xwindinthewires
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#4 to #1 - toastableduckling
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(02/25/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#3 to #1 - hypex
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(02/25/2013) [-]
no.
#5 to #1 - mothafuckingbatman
Reply +21 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#31 - onipure
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
aaaaah it took me a while to get that
#35 to #31 - anon id: 59d5b02e
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
maths
#45 - tonicwater
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
User avatar #54 - tigronn
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
Pythagorean theorem is possibly the easiest thing i've ever got in math class
#9 - pocoyothegreat
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
#28 to #9 - willindor
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
#18 - thalfak
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#19 to #18 - omgusogay
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
why the **** did you feel the need to write this?   
   
are you really that desperate for validation?
why the **** did you feel the need to write this?

are you really that desperate for validation?
#20 to #19 - thalfak
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#21 to #20 - omgusogay
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
No, you silly twat.    
   
Your comment was just a pointless attempt to seem smart of average intelligence.   
   
My comment was a utilitarian move to try and stop you posting asinine ****.
No, you silly twat.

Your comment was just a pointless attempt to seem smart of average intelligence.

My comment was a utilitarian move to try and stop you posting asinine ****.
User avatar #23 to #21 - TheEpicTroll
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
Could I bother you for what he said, in his comments, if you can remember, please?
#25 to #23 - omgusogay
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
... i'm tempted to keep it secret, to preserve the mystery. lol

but it actually isn't very interesting, he just decided to ascribe arbitrary values to the cubes in the gif and work them through the (basic) formula to 'prove it'.

Presumably to show off his mad, rad elementary-level skillz
#26 to #25 - omgusogay
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
...oh and then he wrote in the second comment
"I could say the same about you, couldn't I?"

(his mistake was posing it as a question)
User avatar #27 to #26 - TheEpicTroll
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
**** on, we got a mathematical prodigy on our hands. Next you'll tell me he knows his sine, cosine and tangent ratios.
#12 - IamSofaKingdom
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
I can appreciate the math behind it but when I look at them it just seems to me like it would obviously fit. I thought it was just a math demonstration until my friends told me it is supposed to look like the water will overflow.
I can appreciate the math behind it but when I look at them it just seems to me like it would obviously fit. I thought it was just a math demonstration until my friends told me it is supposed to look like the water will overflow.
User avatar #29 to #12 - jouten
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
No your friends are wrong and you are right. It's just a math demonstration, not an optic illusion
#80 to #29 - IamSofaKingdom
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/27/2013) [-]
Oh. Good then!
Oh. Good then!
User avatar #10 - tkfourtwoone
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
But if you don't get the same height for all 3 bodies, then you're ****** (you know, volume, cubic meters?...)
User avatar #13 to #10 - zaxzwim
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
but it's just squares isn't it?
User avatar #14 to #13 - tkfourtwoone
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
What you see in the gif are bodies, not 2D planes
User avatar #15 to #14 - zaxzwim
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
yes but say they are 3cm thick (i use centimeters and i'm not looking up conversions) all the rest look to be also 3cm thick
User avatar #16 to #15 - tkfourtwoone
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
Yes, that's what I said, that it's the ideal condition where all the bodies' height is the same, therefore it can be ignored.
But that little demonstration of Pythagora's Law goes down the drainer if you troll with the height, therefore increasing the volume.

What do you want? I just woke up when I saw the damn thing and it was the first thing that popped in my head
#32 to #16 - anon id: 5f8639e8
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
you would have to dive the square filled with water by 2.25
User avatar #17 to #16 - zaxzwim
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/26/2013) [-]
oh, sorry i mistook your first comment i had thought you meant length and i was so confused
[ 78 comments ]
Leave a comment