Underwater firearm. .. Shoot a tazer do it, faget.
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
Buy your amazon goods through FJ's link.
Just click this link and search for any product you want. FJ gets a commission on everything you buy.

Comments(175):

[ 175 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #31 - dragontamers ONLINE (01/31/2013) [+] (10 replies)
How could that thing fire underwater?
User avatar #38 to #31 - Temperance (01/31/2013) [-]
Instead of thumbing you down I shall explain. Ahem...

Modern cartridges are airtight and are already surrounded by enough air inside the casing to properly ignite the propellant inside. When the striker hits the priming charge on the back of the round the propellant combusts causing the bullet to leave its casing. Granted, discharging a firearm underwater is not ideal as the gif no doubt showed you, and can cause issues when reloading.
#6 - treborsivad (01/31/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Shoot a tazer

do it, faget.
#46 - generic (01/31/2013) [+] (16 replies)
The results...
#39 - glenbluez (01/31/2013) [+] (5 replies)
Watergun...... that is all
#37 - strooz (01/31/2013) [+] (9 replies)
Glock.
Glock.
#126 - pyra (01/31/2013) [+] (5 replies)
freezeframe
#131 to #130 - pyra (01/31/2013) [-]
I've seen enough horse penis to know that it does not, in fact, look like a horse penis
#29 - waffies ONLINE (01/31/2013) [+] (7 replies)
Mythbusters did a bunch of test-firings of guns into water to see if the bullets whiz around like in the movies. Turns out that the larger the caliber, the less distance it penetrates the water. Even the .50 Caliber round disintegrated milliseconds after hitting the water
Mythbusters did a bunch of test-firings of guns into water to see if the bullets whiz around like in the movies. Turns out that the larger the caliber, the less distance it penetrates the water. Even the .50 Caliber round disintegrated milliseconds after hitting the water
User avatar #4 - Maroon ONLINE (01/30/2013) [+] (10 replies)
it went like 3 feet
#19 - gatodelfuego (01/31/2013) [+] (28 replies)
A gun was designed to fire rockets instead of bullets, eventually speeding up to bullet velocity but useless within a few feet. It could be fired underwater and in space.
User avatar #137 - giveupnow (01/31/2013) [+] (18 replies)
Most weapons that fire cartridges can shoot in space and underwater because they have oxidizer in them.
User avatar #83 - Dap (01/31/2013) [-]
0 to ~825mph to 0 in 18 inches.

No wonder the bullet gets absolutely ruined haha

#177 - slashendrix (01/31/2013) [-]
Try it with a taser.
#127 - padrerebelscumole (01/31/2013) [-]
All mighty b12









glock
User avatar #10 - ribar (01/31/2013) [+] (2 replies)
i wonder if its still loud
User avatar #14 to #10 - bokkos (01/31/2013) [-]
Well sound propagates much farther and faster in water than in air... So it is a possibility.
User avatar #15 - xsap (01/31/2013) [+] (1 reply)
in one of the myth busters episodes they were testing a myth where they shot the water from the surface to see how deep it will go... the bullet just blew up as soon as it touched the water
#132 - classicvictory (01/31/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#119 - parman (01/31/2013) [-]
Yay effective range....1m
User avatar #18 - douevensax (01/31/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Could it still kill point-blank?
User avatar #26 to #18 - bionicsheep (01/31/2013) [-]
yup. The only reason it goes slowly in water is because it is so much more dense than the air. Humans are more dense than water, so it would slow down faster in us than it did in the pool. The only reason it slows to a stop is because there is water all along the path of the bullet, where as if it were fired at a person in regular (above water) conditions, it only needs to pass through a few inches or so.

There could be some initial energy loss due to gasses not being able to expand as rapidly underwater as they can in air, but i'm not certain, so i didn't want to use it in my justification
[ 175 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)