| All | Popular >
|
animemanga
|
pokemon
|
doctor-who
|
videogames
|
morbid-channel
|
lol-channel
|
nazi-time
|
ponytime
|
politics
|
4chan
|
feels
|
funny
|
adventure-time
|
1stworldproblems
|
lolstuffs
|
bendingtime
|
fucking-science
|
legend-of-zelda
|
gameofthrones
|
katawashoujo
|
tf2
|
ferretsnigga
|
oc-comic-makers
|
ededdneddy
|
darksoulstime
|
titan-time
|
startrek
|
haha-fatpeople
|
fordummies
|
funny-troll
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply +5
#1 - N. Korean citizen (01/25/2013) [-]
Did that count as a Touchdown? It's didn't touch or cross the line, but the player did while he was holding it.
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply -2
User avatar #4 to #1 - mdawgsome **User deleted account** (01/26/2013) [-]
Actually he had no control of the ball when he landed in the end-zone, had part of him hit the ground before the ball crossed the line it would have been a touchdown.
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply +1
User avatar #5 to #4 - LemonNADE (01/26/2013) [-]
That is not true.
If the ball doesn't cross the line, no touchdown.
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply 0
User avatar #8 to #5 - mdawgsome **User deleted account** (01/26/2013) [-]
Also sorry, I actually just looked up the rules NFL vs CFL I'm from Canada and grew up playing with CFL rules. The wording is different and actually in Canada what I said originally would be correct.
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply 0
User avatar #7 to #5 - mdawgsome **User deleted account** (01/26/2013) [-]
So now I ask...a QB throws a ball near the front corner of the end-zone, it goes out of bounds then goes into where the end-zone would be, but never crosses the goal line as it was out of bounds. The receiver makes a diving or outstretched catch, with both feet landing in bounds. However the ball at no time was in the end zone, what's the rule?
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Edit Image Reply +10
#2 to #1 - teranin ONLINE (01/25/2013) [-]
no, it didn't, because the ball didn't cross the endzone.
Back to the content 'One of the slickest plays ever made'
<
>
 Friends (0)